Interprofessional care teams: the perils of fads and fashions

References

• Gratton L, Erickson TJ. Eight ways to build collaborative teams. In: Review HB, (ed.) On teams. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press; 2013. p. 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Poole MS, Real K. Groups and teams in health care: communication and effectiveness. In: Thompson TL, Dorsey AM, Miller KI, Parrott R, (eds.) Handbook of health communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 2003. p. 369–402.
   Google Scholar
• Baker DP, Day R, Salas E. Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations. Health Serv Res 2006;41(4):1576–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00566.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Helmreich RL. Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians. Crit Care Med 2003;31(3):956–9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000056183.89175.76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buljac-Samardzic M, Dekker-van Doorn CM, van Wijngaarden JDH, van Wijk KP. Interventions to improve team effectiveness: a systematic review. Health Policy 2010;94:183–95. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas E, Cooke NJ, Rosen MA. On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments. Hum Factors 2008;50(3):540–7. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas E, Sims DF, Burke CS. Is there a ‘big five’ in teamwork? Small Gr Res 2005;36(5):555–99. doi: 10.1177/1046496405277134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenbach JR, Smith DK. The discipline of teams. In: Review HB, (ed.) On teams. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press; 2013. p. 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Sheard AG, Kakabadse AP. A process perspective on leadership and team development. J Manage Dev 2004;23(1):7–106. doi: 10.1108/02621710410511027
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan E. The ‘actualities’ of knowledge work: an institutional ethnography of multi-disciplinary primary health care teams. Sociol Health Ill 2009;31(5):625–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01167.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP. Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin Sci Quart 2001;46:685–716. doi: 10.2307/3094828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair DM, Fitzpatrick JJ, McNulty R, Click ER, Glembocki MM. Frequency of nurse-physician collaborative behaviors in an acute care hospital. J Interprof Care 2012;26:115–20. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.637647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xyrichis A, Ream E. Teamwork: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008;61(2):232–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04496.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth-Cozens J. Why communication fails in the operating room. Qual Safety Health Care 2004;13:327. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010785
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Regehr G, Baker GR, Reznick R, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Safety Health Care 2004;13:330–4. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.008425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker KL, Stohl C. Communicating in a collaborating group: a longitudinal network analysis. Commun Monogr2012;79(4):448–74. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2012.723810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark PG. What would a theory of interprofessional education look like? Some suggestions for developing a theoretical framework for team work training. J Interprof Care 2006;20:577–89. doi: 10.1080/13561820600916717
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D'Amour D, Ferrada-Videla M, Rodriguez LSM, Beaulieu MD. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. J Interpr of Care 2005;19:116–31. doi: 10.1080/13561820500082529
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hew KF, Hara N. Knowledge sharing in online environments: a qualitative case study. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tech 2007;58:2310–24. doi: 10.1002/asi.20698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott A. The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lammers JC, Garcia MA. Exploring the concept of ‘profession’ for organizational communication research. Manage Commun Quart 2009;22(3):357–84. doi: 10.1177/0893318908327007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald KM. The sociology of the professions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Larson MS. The rise of professionalism: a sociological analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott A. Status and strain in the professions. Am J Sociol 1981;86:819–35. doi: 10.1086/227318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicotte C, D'Amour D, Moreault M. Interdisciplinary collaboration within Quebec community health care centres. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:991–1003. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00232-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalman ME, Monge PR, Fulk J, Heino R. Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Commun Res 2002;29(2):125–54. doi: 10.1177/0093650202029002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokols D. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. Am J Commun Psychol 2006;38:79–93. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9060-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Safety Health Care 2004;13(Suppl. 1):i85–90. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.010033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartunek JM. Intergroup relationships and quality improvement in healthcare. Brit Med J Qual Safety 2011;20(Suppl. 1):i62–6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046169
   Google Scholar
• Hughes B, Fitzpatrick JJ. Nurse-physician collaboration in an acute care community hospital. J Interprof Care 2010;24(6):625–32. doi: 10.3109/13561820903550804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JD. Dosage: a guiding principle for health communicators. New York: Rowman & Littlefield; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter RM. When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovations in organizations. Res Organ Behav 1988;10:169–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E. Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad Manage Rev 1991;16(3):586–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. The diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley P, Powell WW. From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: decoupling in the contemporary world. Acad Manage Ann 2012;6(1):483–530. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2012.684462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol 1977;83(2):340–63. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF. Communication of innovations. 2nd ed. New York: Free Press; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing JW, Kreuter MW. Designing for diffusion: how can we increase uptake of cancer communication innovations? Patient Edu Counsel 2010;81:S100–10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.013
   Google Scholar
• Bradley EH, Webster TR, Baker D, Schlesinger M, Inouye SK, Barth MC, et al. Translating research into practice: speeding the adoption of innovative health care programs; 2004. Available from: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=233248.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman E, Roman PM. Information diffusion in the implementation of innovation processes. Commun Res 1984;11:117–40. doi: 10.1177/009365084011001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijen F. Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Acad Manage Rev 2014;39(3):302–23. doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L. Institutional and competitive bandwagons: using mathematical modeling a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Acad Manage Rev 1993;18(3):487–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas EJ. Improving teamwork in healthcare: current approaches and the path forward. Brit Med J Qual Safety 2011;20(8):647–50. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter E, Goldman J, Martimianakis T, Chatalalsingh C, DeMatteo DJ, Reeves S. The use of systems and organizational theories in the interprofessional field: findings from a scoping review. J Interprof Care 2013;27:57–64. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2012.739670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas P, Payne D, Drumm B. Understanding the network structure of Irish primary care teams. Paper presented at the International Network of Social Network Analysis, Brighton, United Kingdom; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Brown AD. Politics, symbolic action and myth making in pursuit of legitimacy. Organ Stud 1994;15(6):861–78. doi: 10.1177/017084069401500605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 1983;48:147–60. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• March JG. A primer on decision making: how decisions happen. New York: Free Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ. Substance and symbolism in CEOs’ long term incentive plans. Admin Sci Quart 1994;39:367–90. doi: 10.2307/2393295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MT, Fiss PC. Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: the logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U.S. hospitals. Acad Manage J 2009;52(5):897–918. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.44633062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts? Acad Manage Rev 1997;22:853–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache A, Santos F. When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad Manage Rev 2010;35(3):455–76. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen MD, March JG. Leadership and ambiguity: the American college president. 2nd ed. Boston: Harvard Business School; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Bolman LG, Deal TE. Reframing organizations: artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Carson JB, Tesluk PE, Marrone JA. Shared leadership in teams: an investigation into antecedent conditions and performance. Acad Manage J 2007;50(5):1217–34. doi: 10.2307/20159921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronstein LR. A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Soc Work 2003;48(3):297–306. doi: 10.1093/sw/48.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R. Changing physicians’ competence and performance: finding the balance between the individual and the organization. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002;22:244–51. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340220409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirokawa RY, DeGooyer DH Jr, Valde KS. Characteristics of effective health care teams. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Co; 2003.
   Google Scholar