10,013
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Authentic teachers: Student criteria perceiving authenticity of teachers

& | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1247609 | Received 04 Aug 2016, Accepted 10 Oct 2016, Published online: 21 Oct 2016

References

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 321–334.10.1080/07294360500284672
  • Brekelmans, J. M. G., Wubbels, T., & Creton, H. A. (1989). Een typologie van leerlingenpercepties van leraargedrag [A typology of student perceptions of teacher behaviour]. Pedagogische Studien, 66, 315–326.
  • Carbonneau, N., Vallerand, R. J., Fernet, C., & Guay, F. (2008). The role of passion for teaching in intrapersonal and interpersonal outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 977–987.10.1037/a0012545
  • Chiu, L. H., & Tulley, M. (1997). Student preferences of teacher discipline styles. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24, 168–175.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Cope, C. (2004). Ensuring validity and reliability in phenomenographic research using the analytical framework of a structure of awareness. Qualitative Research Journal, 4, 5–18.
  • Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113–143.10.3102/003465430298563
  • Cranton, P., & Carusetta, E. (2004). Developing authenticity as a transformative process. Journal of Transformative Education, 2, 276–293.10.1177/1541344604267898
  • Créton, H. A., & Wubbels, Th. (1984). Discipline problems with beginning teachers. Utrecht: W.C.C.
  • Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38, 207–234.10.1207/S15326985EP3804_2
  • Day, C. (2004). A passion for teaching. London: RoutledgeFalmer.10.4324/9780203464342
  • Day, C. (2007, April 30). A passion for teaching. Lecture presented at General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland. Retrieved December 28, 2011, from http://www.gtcni.org.uk/index.cfm/area/News/page/New/news_key/20/
  • De Bruyckere, P., Struyf, E., & Kavadias, D. (2015). Rousseau and Arendt in the iPad class, the old roots of present day discussions on technology in schools. Pedagogische Studien, 92, 202–209.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303–315.10.1086/jcr.1993.20.issue-2
  • Gallego, M. A. (2001). Is experience the best teacher?: The potential of coupling classroom and community-based field experiences. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 312–325.10.1177/0022487101052004005
  • Gennip, V. E., & Vrieze, G. (2008). Wat is de ideale leraar? Studie naar vakkennis, interventie en persoon [Who is the ideal teacher? Study on topical knowledge, intervention and personality]. Nijmegen: Raboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
  • Gilmore, J. H., & Pine, J. B. (2007). Authenticity: What consumers really want. New York, NY: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
  • Goldstone, R. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65, 231–262.10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00047-4
  • Gulikers, J. T., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 67–86.
  • Hancock, B. (1998). Trent focus for research and development in primary health care: An introduction to qualitative research. Nottingham: Trent Focus. Retrieved January 19, 2012, from http://faculty.cbu.ca/pmacintyre/course_pages/MBA603/MBA603_files/IntroQualitativeResearch.pdf
  • Harden, R. M., & Crosby, J. (2000). AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer-the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher, 22, 334–347.
  • Hattie, J. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building Teacher Quality, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hattie, J., & Clinton, J. (2008). Identifying accomplished teachers: A validation study. In L. Ingvarson & J. Hattie (Eds.), Assessing teachers for professional certification: the first decade of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (pp. 313–344). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.10.1016/S1474-7863(07)11011-5
  • Hattie, J., & Jaeger, R. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: A deductive approach. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 111–122.10.1080/0969595980050107
  • Korthagen, F. A. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 77–97.10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
  • Kreber, C., Klampfleitner, M., McCune, V., Bayne, S., & Knottenbelt, M. (2007). What do you mean by “authentic”? A comparative review of the literature on conceptions of authenticity in teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 58, 22–43.10.1177/0741713607305939
  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Larsson, J., & Holmström, I. (2007). Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: Does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2, 55–64.10.1080/17482620601068105
  • Leary, T. (1957). An interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York, NY: Ronald Press Company.
  • Lin, L. (2006). Cultural dimensions of authenticity in teaching. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2006, 63–72.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0717
  • Lambert, S. D., & Loiselle, C. G. (2008). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 228–237.
  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography - A research approach investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21, 28–49.
  • Moore, A. (2004). The good teacher. East Sussex: Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203420270
  • Peterson, R. A. (1997). Creating country music - fabricating authenticity. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Potter, A. (2010). The authenticity hoax: How we got lost finding ourselves. New York, NY: Harper/HarperCollins.
  • Pratt, D. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 42, 203–220.
  • Ragin, C. (1994). Constructing social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  • Rawlins, W. K. (2000). Teaching as a mode of friendship. Communication Theory, 10, 5–26.10.1111/comt.2000.10.issue-1
  • Rodgers, C. R., & Raider-Roth, M. B. (2006). Presence in teaching. Teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 12, 265–287.10.1080/13450600500467548
  • Rogers, C. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80s. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
  • Sandelowski, M. (1995). Triangles and crystals: On the geometry of qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 18, 569–574.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X
  • Steele, C. F. (2009). The inspired teacher: how to know one, grow one, or be one. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Trilling, L. (1974). Sincerity and authenticity. Cambrigde, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Turner, P., & Turner, S. (2009). Triangulation in practice. Virtual Reality, 13, 171–181.10.1007/s10055-009-0117-2
  • Uljens, M. (1996). On the philosophical foundations of phenomenography. In G. Dall’Alba & B. Hasselgren (Eds.), Reflections on phenomenography: Toward a methodology? (Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences No. 109, pp. 103–128). Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
  • Van Petegem, K. (2008). Relationship between student, teacher, classroom characteristics and students’ school wellbeing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation Ghent University). Ghent, Belgium: Ugent.
  • Williams, E. A., Pillai, R., Deptula, B., & Lowe, K. B. (2012). The effects of crisis, cynicism about change, and value congruence on perceptions of authentic leadership and attributed charisma in the 2008 presidential election. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 324–341.10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.003
  • Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6–24.10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003
  • Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1993). Comparison of teachers’ and students’ perceptions of interpersonal teacher behavior. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? (pp. 64–80). London: Falmer Press.
  • Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., & van Tartwijk, J. (2006). An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in the Netherlands. In C. Evertson & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1161–1192). Mahwaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.