374
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Note

Understanding bias better: a qualitative exploration of bias in advisory councils of EU agencies

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2306279 | Received 29 Aug 2023, Accepted 11 Jan 2024, Published online: 25 Jan 2024

References

  • Arras, S., and C. Braun. 2017. “Stakeholders Wanted! Why and How European Union Agencies Involve Non-State Stakeholders.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (9): 1257–1275.
  • Ayres, I., and J. Braithwaite. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Baxter, L. G. 2011. “Capture in Financial Regulation: Can We Channel It Toward the Common Good.” Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 21: 175.
  • Beyers, J. 2008. “Policy Issues, Organisational Format and the Political Strategies of Interest Organisations.” West European Politics 31 (6): 1188–1211. doi:10.1080/01402380802372654.
  • Beyers, J., and S. Arras. 2019. “Who Feeds Information to Regulators? Stakeholder Diversity in European Union Regulatory Agency Consultations.” Journal of Public Policy 40 (4): 573–598.
  • Beyers, J., C. Braun, D. Marshall, and I. De Bruycker. 2014. “Let’s Talk! On the Practice and Method of Interviewing Policy Experts.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 3 (2): 174–187.
  • Binderkrantz, A. S. 2012. “Interest Groups in the Media: Bias and Diversity Over Time.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (1): 117–139.
  • Borrás, S., C. Koutalakis, and F. Wendler. 2007. “European Agencies and Input Legitimacy: EFSA, EMeA and EPO in the Post-Delegation Phase.” Journal of European Integration 29 (5): 583–600. doi:10.1080/07036330701694899.
  • Bouwen, P. 2002. “Corporate Lobbying in the European Union: The Logic of Access.” Journal of European Public Policy 9 (3): 365–390.
  • Braun, C. 2012. “The Captive or the Broker? Explaining Public Agency–Interest Group Interactions.” Governance 25 (2): 291–314.
  • Buess, M. 2015. “European Union Agencies and Their Management Boards: An Assessment of Accountability and Demoi-Cratic Legitimacy.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (1): 94–111.
  • Busuioc, M. 2013. “Rule-Making by the European Financial Supervisory Authorities: Walking a Tight Rope.” European Law Journal 19 (1): 111–125.
  • Busuioc, M., and T. Jevnaker. 2022. “EU Agencies’ Stakeholder Bodies: Vehicles of Enhanced Control, Legitimacy or Bias?” Journal of European Public Policy 29 (2): 155–175.
  • Busuioc, M., and M. Lodge. 2016. “The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability.” Governance 29 (2): 247–263.
  • Busuioc, M., and D. Rimkutė. 2020. “Meeting Expectations in the EU Regulatory State? Regulatory Communications Amid Conflicting Institutional Demands.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (4): 547–568.
  • Carpenter, D. P. 2010. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Carpenter, D. P., and D. A. Moss. 2013. Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chalmers, A. W. 2013. “Trading Information for Access: Informational Lobbying Strategies and Interest Group Access to the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (1): 39–58.
  • Chalmers, A. W. 2015. “Financial Industry Mobilisation and Securities Markets Regulation in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 54 (3): 482–501.
  • Checkel, J. T. 2005. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59 (4): 801–826.
  • Coglianese, C., R. Zeckhauser, and E. Parson. 2004. “Seeking Truth for Power: Informational Strategy and Regulatory Policymaking.” Minnesota Law Review 89: 277.
  • Elster, J. 1986. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Democratic Theory.” In Foundations of Social Choice Theory, edited by J. Elster, and A. Hylland, 103–132. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • European Commission. 2010. Communication from the President to the Commission: Framework for the Commission Expert Groups: Horizontal Rules and Public Register, C(2010) 7649 final, 10 November 2010, Brussels.
  • Fraussen, B., J. Beyers, and T. Donas. 2015. “The Expanding Core and Varying Degrees of Insiderness: Institutionalised Interest Group Access to Advisory Councils.” Political Studies 63 (3): 569–588.
  • Furlong, S. R., and C. M. Kerwin. 2004. “Interest Group Participation in Rule Making: A Decade of Change.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3): 353–370. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui022.
  • Gornitzka, Å, and U. Sverdrup. 2011. “Access of Experts: Information and EU Decision-Making.” West European Politics 34 (1): 48–70.
  • Gornitzka, Å, and U. Sverdrup. 2015. “Societal Inclusion in Expert Venues: Participation of Interest Groups and Business in the European Commission Expert Groups.” Politics and Governance 3 (1): 151–165.
  • Grabosky, P. 2013. “Beyond Responsive Regulation: The Expanding Role of non-State Actors in the Regulatory Process.” Regulation & Governance 7 (1): 114–123.
  • Holzinger, K. 2004. “Bargaining Through Arguing: An Empirical Analysis Based on Speech act Theory.” Political Communication 21 (2): 195–222.
  • Klüver, H. 2012. “Biasing Politics? Interest Group Participation in EU Policy-Making.” West European Politics 35 (5): 1114–1133. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.706413.
  • Lowery, D., F. R. Baumgartner, J. Berkhout, J. M. Berry, D. Halpin, M. Hojnacki, H. Klüver, B. Kohler-Koch, J. Richardson, and K. L. Schlozman. 2015. “Images of an Unbiased Interest System.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (8): 1212–1231.
  • Pagliari, S., and K. L. Young. 2015. “The Interest Ecology of Financial Regulation: Interest Group Plurality in the Design of Financial Regulatory Policies.” Socio-Economic Review 14 (2): 309–337.
  • Pérez-Durán, I. 2019. “Political and Stakeholder’s Ties in European Union Agencies.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (1): 1–22.
  • Pérez-Durán, I., and C. Bravo-Laguna. 2019. “Representative Bureaucracy in European Union Agencies.” Journal of European Integration 41 (8): 971–992.
  • Quaglia, L. 2008. “Financial Sector Committee Governance in the European Union.” European Integration 30 (4): 563–578.
  • Rasmussen, A., and V. Gross. 2015. “Biased Access? Exploring Selection to Advisory Committees.” European Political Science Review 7 (3): 343–372.
  • Risse, T. 2000. ““Let’s Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics.” International Organization 54 (1): 1–39.
  • Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
  • Schmidt, V. A. 2013. “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’.” Political Studies 61 (1): 2–22.
  • Stigler, G. J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1): 3–21.
  • Tsingou, E. 2010. “Regulatory Reactions to the Global Credit Crisis: Analyzing a Policy Community Under Stress.” In Global Finance in Crisis, edited by E. Helleiner, S. Pagliari, and H. Zimmermann, 35–50. London: Routledge.
  • Tsingou, E. 2015. “Club Governance and the Making of Global Financial Rules.” Review of International Political Economy 22 (2): 225–256.
  • Vikberg, C. 2020. “Explaining Interest Group Access to the European Commission’s Expert Groups.” European Union Politics 21 (2): 312–332.
  • Wood, M. 2018. “Mapping EU Agencies as Political Entrepreneurs.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (2): 404–426.