Phonological processing in written word learning: assessment for children who use augmentative and alternative communication

References

• Baron, J. (1977). Mechanism for pronouncing pseudowords: Use and acquisition. In D. Laberge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 175–216). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct val-idation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17, 10–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D., & Robson, J. (1989). Accurate non-word spelling despite congenital inability to speak: Phoneme-grapheme con-version does not require subvocal articulation. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blischak, D. M. (1994). Phonologic awareness: Implications for individuals with little or no functional speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 245–255.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, C. (1979). Approaching reading through invented spelling. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading, Vol. 2 (pp. 43–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Hjelmquist, E. (1996). Phonologic awareness and literacy abilities in nonspeaking preschool chil-dren with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, /2,138–153.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Hjelmquist, E. (1997). Language and lit-eracy in nonvocal children with cerebral palsy. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 107–133.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, B. E. (1993). The development of literacy in individuals with severe congenital speech and motor impairments. Topics in Language Disorders, /3,16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, B. E., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Phonological processing and reading abilities in adolescents and adults with severe congen-ital speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 15, 156–174.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, E. F., Rudman, H. C., Karlsen, B., & Merwin, J. C. (1982). Stanford Achievement Test. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psy-chology, 42, 73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (1988). Orthographic analogies and reading devel-opment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 239–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. (1990). A special link between rhyming skills and the use of orthographic analogies by beginning readers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32,301–311.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., & Mead, F. (1992). Onset and rime awareness and analogies in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4,103–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A., Evans, D. A., & Yoder, D. E. (1991). Child-hood reading and writing experiences of literate adults with severe speech and motor impairments. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 7,20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. C., & Hammill, D. (1994). Test of Written Spelling. Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, I. Y., Rubin, H., Duques, S., & Carlisle, J. (1985). Lin-guistic ability and spelling proficiency in kindergarteners and adult poor spellers. In D. B. Gray & J. F. Kavanagh (Eds.), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia (pp. 163–176). Parkton, MD: York.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the prob-lems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Special Edu-cation, 6,8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, V. A. (1986). Phonological awareness: The role of reading experience. Cognition, 24,65–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson Co. (1994). Boardmaker for the Macintosh [Com-puter software]. Solana Beach, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1988). The once and future issues of validity: Assess-ing the meaning and consequences of measurement. In H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test validity. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Morais, J. (1991). Metaphonological abilities and literacy. In M. Snowling & M. Thomson (Eds.), Dyslexia: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 93–107). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phonemes arise spon-taneously? Cognition, 7,323–332.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perin, D. (1983). Phonemic segmentation and spelling. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 129–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27,28–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, C. (1971). Preschool children's knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 4/, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Read, C., Zhang, Y. F., Nie, H. Y., Ding, B. Q. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24,31–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner, J. (1973). Perceptual skills curriculum: Auditory motor skills training. New York: Walker.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. S. (1985). Psycholinguistic aspects of reading disabili-ties. In L. S. Siegel & F. J. Morrison (Eds.), Cognitive develop-ment in atypical children (pp. 45–67). New York: Springer-Ver-lag.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. S. (1986). Phonological deficits in children with a read-ing disability. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 2,45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. S. (1993). Phonological processing deficits as the basis of a reading disability. Developmental Review, /3,246–257.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. S., & Faux, D. (1989). Acquisition of certain grapheme-phoneme correspondences in normally achieving and disabled readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1988). Development of grammatical sensitivity, phonological and short-term memory skills in nor-mally achieving and learning disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 24,28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Individual differences in the cognitive processes of reading: I. Word decoding. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 485–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned? Annals of Dyslexia, 35,67–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psy-chology, 38, 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rhymes as units of spoken sylla-bles: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., Herriman, M. L., & Nesdale, A. R. (1988). Meta-lin-guistic abilities and beginning reading. Reading Research Quar-terly, 23, 134–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandervelden M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (1995). Phonological recod-ing and phoneme awareness in early literacy: A developmental approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 854–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (1996). Phonological recod-ing deficits and dyslexia: A developmental perspective. In J. H. Beitchman, N. J. Cohen, M. M. Konstantareas, & R. Tannock (Eds.), Language, learning, and behavior disorders (pp. 224–247). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (1997a). The assessment of phonological processing in early literacy: A developmental approach. In S. H. Clancy & L. F. DiLalla (Eds.), Assessment and intervention issues across the life span (pp. 77–101). Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (1997b). Teaching phono-logical processing skills in early literacy: A developmental approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 63–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandervelden, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (1999). Phonological pro-cessing and literacy in AAC users and students with motor speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, /5,191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonolog-ical processes and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach, L., Wallach, M. A., Dozier, M. G., & Kaplan, N. E. (1977). Poor children learning to read do not have trouble with auditory discrimination but do have trouble with phoneme recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1984). Computerized assessment of intelligibility of dysarthric speech. Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.
   Google Scholar