Robot-like dexterity without computers and motors: a review of hand-held laparoscopic instruments with wrist-like tip articulation

References

• Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WCJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, et al. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93(8):921–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2004;239:43–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency Market Research Reports. Minimally invasive surgery market - global industry analysis, size, share, growth, trends & forecast, 2013 – 2019. Albany (NY): Transparency Market Research; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher A, McClure N, McGuigan J, et al. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy. 1998;30:617–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, et al. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assister Surg. 2012;9:396–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, et al. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004;239:14–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intuitive Surgical Annual Report 2014. Sunnyvale (CA): Intuitive Surgical, Inc.; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Prewitt R, Bochkarev V, McBride CL, et al. The patterns and costs of the da Vinci robotic surgery system in a large academic institution. J Robot Surg. 2008;2(1):17–20.
   Google Scholar
• van Dam P, Hauspy J, Verkinderen L, et al. Do costs of robotic surgery matter? In: Advanced gynecologic endoscopy. InTechOpen; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(2):157–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelínek F, Arkenbout EA, Henselmans PWJ, et al. Classification of joints used in steerable instruments for minimally invasive surgery–a review of the state of the art. ASME J Med Devices. 2015;9.
   Google Scholar
• Fan C, Dodou D, Breedveld P. Review of manual control methods for handheld maneuverable instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013;22(3):127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklar Surgical Instruments. “Laparoscopic Systems: Double Curve Instruments” [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2015 Nov 20]. Available from: www.sklarcorp.com/pdf/LaparoscopicCatalog.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith & Nephew. SERPENT articulating instruments [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.smith-nephew.com/professional/products/all-products/serpent/
   Google Scholar
• EndoControl. JAiMY [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.endocontrol-medical.com/en/products/jaimy-yes/
   Google Scholar
• Amato F, Carbone M, Cosentino C, et al. A versatile mechatronic tool for minimally invasive surgery. In: The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006; 2006 Feb 20–22. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE. BioRob 2006; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dario P, Carrozza M, Marcacci M, et al. A novel mechatronic tool for computer-assisted arthroscopy. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2000 March;4(1):15–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piccigallo M, Focacci F, Tonet O, et al. Hand-held robotic instrument for dextrous laparoscopic interventions. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2008;4(4):331–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspers J, Grimbergen C. Mechanical manipulator for intuitive control of endoscopic instruments with seven degrees of freedom. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; 2004 Sep 28–Oct 2; New York (NY): ASME; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Diks J, Jaspers JEN, Wisselink W, et al. The mechanical master-slave manipulator: an instrument improving the performance in standardized tasks for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(6):1025–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsky TA. Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children: tools and techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(5):e1–e6.
   Google Scholar
• Autonomy Laparo-Angle articulating instrument technology: enabling visualization, access & control in single port laparoscopy [Internet]. 2012. [cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.cambridgeendo.com/technology
   Google Scholar
• Woojin Lee ACWL. Surgical instrument”. United States Patent US8029531 B2. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Euan EBIA, MacDonald R. New tools for a new job-single port laparoscopic surgery equipment. Medical Equipment Insights. 2009;2:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Medtronic. SILS™ hand instruments [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.medtronic.com/covidien/products/hand-instruments-ligation/sils-hand-instruments
   Google Scholar
• Tuebingen Scientific. Radius T surgical system [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.tuebingen-scientific.com/Standard/produktnavigation/radius-t/
   Google Scholar
• Zahraee A, Paik J, Szewczyk J, et al. Toward the development of a hand-held surgical robot for laparoscopy. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron. 2010 Dec;15(6):853–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frede T, Hammady A, Klein J, et al. The radius surgical system - a new device for complex minimally invasive procedures in urology? Eur Urol. 2007;51(4):1015–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano Y, Inaki N, Ishikawa N, et al. Laparoscopic treatment for esophageal achalasia and gastro-esophago-reflex disease using radius surgical system. Indian J Surg. 2013;75(1):160–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inaki N, Waseda M, Schurr M, et al. Experimental results of mesh fixation by a manual manipulator in a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair model. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(2):197–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo ND, Camperchioli I, Gaspari A. Radius surgical system and conventional laparoscopic instruments in abdominal surgery: application, learning curve and ergonomy. Surg Oncol. 2007;16 (Supplement):69–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen J, et al. Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc And Other Interv Tech. 2006;20(5):730–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa N, Kawaguchi M, Shimizu S, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic hernioplasty with the assistance of the Radius Surgical System. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(3):730–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibao K, Higure A, Yamaguchi K. Laparoendoscopic single-site common bile duct exploration using the manual manipulator. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(8):3009–3015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres Bermudez J, Buess G, Waseda M, et al. Laparoscopic intracorporal colorectal sutured anastomosis using the Radius Surgical System in a phantom model. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(7):1624–1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waseda M, Inaki N, Bermudez J, et al. Precision in stitches: Radius Surgical System. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(11):2056–2062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awtar S, Trutna TT, Nielsen JM, et al. FlexDex™: a minimally invasive surgical tool with enhanced dexterity and intuitive control. J Med Device. 2010;4.
   Google Scholar
• Awtar S, Trutna TT, Abani R, et al. FlexDex™: A minimally invasive surgical tool with enhanced dexterity and intuitive actuation. In: ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference; 2009 Aug 30–Sep 2. New York, NY: ASME; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• FLEXDEX SURGICAL: minimally invasive surgical tools. [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2015]. Available from: www.flexdexsurgical.com
   Google Scholar
• Awtar S, Nielsen J, Trutna T, et al. Minimal access tool. United States Patent US 8668702 B2. 2014 Mar 11.
   Google Scholar
• Accelerate Michigan innovation competition: 2015 semi-finalists [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2015]. 2015. Available from: http://acceleratemichigan.org/competition/2015-semi-finalists/
   Google Scholar
• Jelínek F, Pessers R, Breedveld P. DragonFlex smart steerable laparoscopic instrument. ASME J Med Devices. 2013;7.
   Google Scholar
• Jelínek F, Pessers R, Breedveld P. DragonFlex smart steerable laparoscopic instrument. ASME J Med Devices. 2014;8.
   Google Scholar
• Jelínek F, Breedveld P. Design for additive manufacture of fine medical instrumentation–DragonFlex case study. ASME J Mechanical Des. 2015;137.
   Google Scholar
• Jelínek F, Diepens T, Dobbenga S, et al. Method for minimising rolling joint play in the steerable laparoscopic instrument prototype DragonFlex. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24(3):181–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelínek F, Gerboni G, Henselmans PWJ, et al. Attaining high bending stiffness by full actuation in steerable minimally invasive surgical instruments. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24(2):77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEAM. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.deamcorporation.com/innovations/single_incision.php
   Google Scholar
• Indes. MiFlex – DEAM laparoscopic instrument [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.indes.eu/en/product/miflex/
   Google Scholar
• Hallbeck M, Oleynikov D, Done K, et al. Ergonomic handle and articulating laparoscopic tool. United States Patent US 8585734 B2. 2013 Nov 19.
   Google Scholar
• Riggl JD, Laveaga AED, Kaufman J, et al. Development of an ergonomic instrument for laparoscopic and less surgery. Los Angeles (CA): Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• UNeMed. Intuitool [Online]. [ cited 2015 Nov]. Available from: https://www.scrollkit.com/s/pwoFY4Q
   Google Scholar
• Trejo AE, Jung M-C, Oleynikov D, et al. Evaluation of a surgeon-centered laparoscopic design to conventional tools. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting; 2005 Sep; Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Trejo AE, Doné KN, DiMartino AA, et al. Articulating vs. conventional laparoscopic grasping tools—surgeons’ opinions. Int J Ind Ergon. 2006;36(1):25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trejo A, Jung M-C, Oleynikov D, et al. Effect of handle design and target location on insertion and aim with a laparoscopic surgical tool. Appl Ergon. 2007;38(6):745–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan C, Clogenson H, Breedveld P, et al. Comparison of two control methods for minimally invasive surgical instruments. J Med Device. 2012;9(1):75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wang S, Li J, et al. Conceptual design of a novel multi-DoF manual instrument for laparoscopic surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wang S, Li J, et al. Easy grasp: a novel hybrid-driven manual medical instrument for laparoscopic surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci. 2012;226:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intuitive Surgical. Image gallery [Internet]. 2010. [cited 2015]. Available from: http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/company/media/images/
   Google Scholar
• Vosse M. DuoFlex: development of a new multi-steerable laparoscopic instrument. Delft University of Technology; Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lathrop RA. Dexterity and guidance without automation: surgical robot-like capabilities at a fraction of the cost. Nashville (TN): Vanderbilt University; 2015.
   Google Scholar