References
- Cizek GJ, Bunch MB. Standard setting. A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2007
- Cleland J, Mackenzie RK, Ross S, Sinclair HK, Lee AJ. A remedial intervention linked to a formative assessment is effective in terms of improving student performance in subsequent degree examinations. Med Teach 2010; 32: e185–e190
- Cohen DS, Colliver JA, Robbs RS, Swartz MH. A large-scale study of the reliabilities of checklist scores and ratings of interpersonal and communication skills evaluated on a standardized-patient examination. Adv Health Sci Educ 1997; 1: 209–213
- Cusimano M. Standard setting in medical education. Acad Med 1996; 71(10)s112–s120
- Cusimano MD, Cohen R, Tucker W, Murnaghan J, Kodama R, Reznick R. A comparative analysis of the costs of administration of an OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination). Acad Med 1994; 69(7)571–576
- Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS3rd. Sage, London 2009; 55–56
- Hauer KE, Ciccone A, Henzel TR, Katsufrakis P, Miller SH, Norcross WA, Papdakis MA, Irby DM. Remediation of the deficiencies of physicians across the continuum from medical school to practice. A thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 2009; 84(12)1822–1832
- Hauer KE, Teherani A, Irby DM, Kerr KM, O'sullivan PS. Approaches to medical student remediation after a comprehensive skills examination. Med Educ 2008; 42: 104–112
- Hays R, Sen Gupta T, Veitch J. The practical value of the standard error of measurement in borderline pass/fail decisions. Medi Educ 2008; 42: 810–815
- Kramer A, Muijtjens A, Koos J, Dusman H, Tan L, van der Vleuten C. Comparison of a rational and an empirical standard setting procedure for an OSCE. Med Educ 2003; 37(2)132–139
- Martin IG, Jolly B. Predictive validity and estimated cut score of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) used as an assessment of clinical skills at the end of the first clinical year. Med Educ 2002; 36: 418–425
- Pell G, Boursicot K, Roberts T. The trouble with resits. Assess Eval High Educ 2009a; 34(2)243–251
- Pell G, Fuller R, Homer M, Roberts T. How to measure the quality of the OSCE: A review of metrics – AMEE guide no. 49. Med Teach 2010; 32(10)802–811
- Pell G, Fuller R, Roberts T, Homer M. Comments on within-station between-sites variation. Med Educ 2009b; 43(10)1021–1022
- Pell G, Roberts TE. Setting standards for student assessment. Int J Res Method Educ 2006; 29(1)91–103
- Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick RK, Szalay D. Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med 1998; 73(9)993–997
- Ricketts C. A new look at resits: Are they simply a second chance?. Assess Eval High Educ 2010; 35: 351–356
- Roberts C, Newble D, Jolly B, Reed M, Hampton K. Assuring the quality of high-stakes undergraduate assessments of clinical competence. Med Teach 2006; 28(6)535–543
- Sayer M, Chaput de Saintonge M, Evans D, Wood D. Support for students with academic difficulties. Med Educ 2002; 36: 643–650
- Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales, 4th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008
- White CB, Ross PT, Gruppen LD. Remediating students’ failed OSCE performances at one school: The effects of self-assessment, reflection and feedback. Acad Med 2009; 84(5)651–654