References
- Arnold L, Shue CK, Kalishman S, Prislin M, Pohl C, Pohl H, Stern DT. Can there be a single system for peer assessment of professionalism among medical students? A multi-institutional study. Acad Med 2007; 82(6)578–586
- Cushing A, Abbott S, Lothian D, Hall A, Westwood O. Peer feedback as an aid to learning – What do we want? Feedback. When do we want it?. Now! Med Teach 2011; 33: 105–112
- English R, Brookes ST, Avery K, Blazeby JM, Ben-Shlomo Y. The effectiveness and reliability of peer marking in first year medical students. Med Educ 2006; 40(10)965–972
- Finn G, Swandon M, Clipsham L, McLachlan J. Peer estimates of low professionalism correlate with low conscientiousness index scores. Med Educ 2009; 43(10)960–967
- Henning JM, Weidner TG, Marty MC. Peer assisted learning in clinical education: Literature review. Athl Train Educ J 2008; 3: 844–890
- Jones R, Higgs R, de Angelis C, Prideaux D. Changing face of medical curricula. Lancet 2001; 357: 699–703
- Keaten JA, Richardson ME, 1992. A field investigation of peer assessment as part of the student group grading process. Paper presented at Western Speech Communication Association Convention. Conference Proceedings Feb 12–16 1992 Albuquerque NM
- Kernan WN, Quagliarello V, Green ML. Student faculty rounds: A peer-mediated learning activity for internal medicine clerkships. Med Teach 2005; 27(2)140–144
- Sluijsman D, Dochy F, Moerkerke G. Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer-, and co-assessment. Learn Environ Res 1999; 1: 293–319
- Topping KJ. Trends in peer learning. Educ Psychol 2005; 25(6)631–645
- van den Berg I, Admiraal W, Pilot A. Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assess Eval High Educ 2006; 31(1)19–36