A qualitative study on trainees’ and supervisors’ perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education

References

• ACGME. 2010. Outcome project [Online]. [Accessed 14 March 2010] Available from http://www.acgme.org/outcome/
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum M. Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations. High Educ 1997; 33: 71–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black P, Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ Princ Pol Pract 1998; 5: 7–74
   Google Scholar
• Boud D, Falchikov N. Aligning assessment with long term learning. Assess Eval High Educ 2006; 31: 399–413
   Google Scholar
• Carless D. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Stud High Educ 2006; 31: 219–233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland JN, Lim AS, Murphy KR, editors. 2007. Feedback phobia? Why employees do not want to give or receive performance feedback. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cross V, Hicks C, Parle J, Field S. Perceptions of the learning environment in higher specialist training of doctors: Implications for recruitment and retention. Med Educ 2006; 40: 121–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom J, Dorai-Raj A, Mcgill D, Owen C, Tymms K, Watson DAR. What motivates senior clinicians to teach medical students?. BMC Med Educ 2005; 5: 27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296: 1094–1102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis M, Schuwirth L, Braat D, Scheele F. What's the problem with the mini-CEX?. Med Educ 2011; 45: 318–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek NL, Mark MB, Regehr G. Failure to fail: The perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med 2005; 80: S84–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durning SJ, Cation LJ, Markert RJ, Pangaro LN. Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise for internal medicine residency training. Acad Med 2002; 77: 900–904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983; 250: 777–781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle N, Tait H. Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. High Educ 1990; 19: 169–194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 79: S70–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen S, Dochy F, Dierick S, Segers M, Dochy F, Cascallar E. Evaluating the consequential validity of new modes of assessment: The influence of assessment on learning, including pre-, post-, and true assessment effects optimising new modes of assessment. Search of qualities and standards, WH Gijselaers, LA Wilkerson, HPA Boshuizen. Springer, The Netherlands 2003; 37–54
   Google Scholar
• Gijbels D, Dochy F. Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: Can formative assessment make a difference?. Educ Stud 2006; 32: 399–409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatem CJ, Searle NS, Gunderman R, Krane NK, Perkowski L, Schutze GE, Steiner TY. The educational attributes and responsibilities of effective medical educators. Acad Med 2011; 86: 474–480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES, Huot S, Chung J, Norcini J, Hawkins RE. Construct validity of the MiniClinical Evaluation Exercise (MiniCEX). Acad Med 2003; 78: 826–830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine DH. Everyone is entitled to a good doctor. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 256–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember D, Gow L. A model of student approaches to learning encompassing ways to influence and change approaches. Instr Sci 1989; 18: 263–288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy TJ, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard LA. Progressive independence in clinical training: A tradition worth defending?. Acad Med 2005; 80: S106–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: A systematic review. JAMA 2009; 302: 1316–1326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Psychology 2009; 1: 30–46
   Google Scholar
• Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, Vos CM, Westers P, Croiset G. How motivation affects academic performance: A structural equation modelling analysis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012; 1–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc VR, Tabak D, Kneebone R, Nestel D, Macrae H, Moulton CA. Psychometric properties of an integrated assessment of technical and communication skills. Am J Surg 2009; 197: 96–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Miller A, Archer J. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors’ education and performance: A systematic review. BMJ 2010; 341: c5064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2009. NHS, About modernising medical careers [Online]. [Accessed 14 March 2010] Available from http://www.mmc.nhs.uk/medical_education/about_modernising_medical_care.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Nothnagle M, Anandarajah G, Goldman RE, Reis S. Struggling to be self-directed: Residents’ paradoxical beliefs about learning. Acad Med 2011; 86: 1539–1544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price M, Handley K, Millar J, O’Donovan B. Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?. Assess Eval High Educ 2010; 35: 277–289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCPSC. 2009. The CANMEDS 2005 physician competency framework [Online]. [Accessed 14 March 2010] Available from http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/CanMEDS2005/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Sadler DR. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instr Sci 1989; 18: 119–144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satpathy A, Kneebone R. Workplace-based assessment in surgical training: A qualitative study. Bull R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93: 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach 2011; 33: 478–485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senko C, Hulleman CS, Harackiewicz JM. Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educ Psychol 2011; 46: 26–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard LA. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educ Res 2000; 29: 4–14
   Google Scholar
• Southgate L, Hays RB, Norcini J, Mulholland H, Ayers B, Woolliscroft J, Cusimano M, Mcavoy P, Ainsworth M, Haist S, et al. Setting performance standards for medical practice: A theoretical framework. Med Educ 2001; 35: 474–481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S, Segers M, Dochy F, Cascallar E. Students’ perceptions about new modes of assessment in higher education: A review. Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards, WH Gijselaers, LA Wilkerson, HPA Boshuizen. Springer, The Netherlands 2003; 331–347
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland K, Leatherman S. Does certification improve medical standards?. BMJ 2006; 333: 439–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson DB, Norman GR, Linn RL. Performance-based assessment: Lessons from the health professions. Educ Res 1995; 24: 5–11
   Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1996; 1: 41–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005; 39: 309–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandewalle D, Cron WL, Slocum JW. The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. J Appl Psychol 2001; 86: 629–640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach 2006; 28: 117–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Kenyon CF, Schulz V, Goldszmidt MA, Zibrowski E, Lingard L. An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents. Acad Med 2010; 85: 1157–1162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Kenyon CF, Zibrowski EM, Schulz V, Goldszmidt MA, Singh I, Maddocks HL, Lingard L. Rules of engagement: Residents’ perceptions of the in-training evaluation process. Acad Med 2008; 83: S97–S100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson JR, Crossley JG, Wragg A, Mills P, Cowan G, Wade W. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med Educ 2008; 42: 364–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters C. Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. J Educ Psychol 2004; 96: 236–250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke M. Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. High Educ 2003; 45: 477–501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar