References
- Boursicot K, Etheridge L, Setna Z, Sturrock A, Ker J, Smee S, Sambandam E. Performance in assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa conference. Med Teach 2011; 33: 370–383
- Burke D, Pieterick J. Giving students effective written feedback. Mcgraw-hill education, England 2010
- Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. J Am Med Assoc 1983; 250: 777–781
- Fernando N, Cleland J, Mckenzie H, Cassar K. Identifying the factors that determine feedback given to undergraduate medical students following formative mini-cex assessments. Med Educ 2008; 42: 89–95
- Gee JP. An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge, London 2005
- Harvey P, Radomski N. Performance pressure: Simulated patients and high-stakes examinations in a regional clinical school. Aust J Rural Health 2011; 19: 284–289
- Hauer KE, O'brien BC, Hansen IA, Hirsh D, Ma IH, Ogur B, Poncelet AN, Alexander EK, Teherani A. More is better: Students describe successful and unsuccessful experiences with teachers differently in brief and longitudinal relationships. Acad Med 2012; 87: 1389–1396
- Hill F, Kendall K, Galbraith K, Crossley J. Implementing the undergraduate mini-cex: A tailored approach at Southampton University. Med Educ 2009; 43: 326–334
- Jolly B, Boud D. Written feedback. Feedback in higher and professional education, D Boud, E Molloy. Routledge, Oxon 2013; 104–124
- Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: A systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 2009; 302: 1316–1326
- Lye PS, Biernat KA, Bragg DS, Simpson DE. A pleasure to work with–An analysis of written comments on student evaluations. Ambul Pediatr 2001; 1: 128–131
- Lynch DC, Surdyk PM, Eiser AR. Assessing professionalism: A review of the literature. Med Teach 2004; 26: 366–373
- Norcini J. The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-cex). Clin Teach 2005; 2: 25–30
- Norcini JL, Blank IL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-cex: A method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 476–481
- Ogunbanjo GA. Adapting mini-cex scoring to improve inter-rater reliability. Med Educ 2009; 43: 484–485
- Park S, Griffin A, Gill D. Working with words: Exploring textual analysis in medical education research. Med Educ 2012; 46: 372–380
- Prystowsky JB, Darosa DA. A learning prescription permits feedback on feedback. Am J Surg 2003; 185: 264–267
- Qadan L, Al-ozairi E, Ayed A, Huang G. Avoiding honest feedback: Discordance between formal evaluations and candid assessments of kuwaiti pbl students. Med Teach 2013; 35: 459–464
- Riessman CK. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2008
- Salerno SM, Jackson JL, O'malley PG. Interactive faculty development seminars improve the quality of written feedback in ambulatory teaching. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 831–834
- Sinclair HK, Cleland JA. Undergraduate medical students: Who seeks formative feedback?. Med Educ 2007; 41: 580–582
- Solarsh G, Lindley J, Whyte G, Fahey M, Walker A. Governance and assessment in a widely distributed medical education program in Australia. Acad Med 2012; 87: 807–814