Aligning physical learning spaces with the curriculum: AMEE Guide No. 107

References

• Barrett P, Zhang Y, Moffat J, Kobbacy K. 2013. A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils learning. Build Environ. 59:678–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker F, Steele F. 1995. Workplace by design: managing the high performance workscape. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Beichner R, Bernold E, Burniston P, Dail P, Felder R, Gastineau J, Gjersten M, Risley J. 1999. Case study of the physics component of an integrated curriculum. Phys Educ Res. 67:S16.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs J, Tang C. 2011. Teaching for quality learning at university. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth A, Worthington J. 2010. Managing the brief for better design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boddington A, Boys J. 2011. Re-shaping learning: a critical reader: the future of learning spaces in post-compulsory education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks C. 2011. Space matters: the impact of formal learning environments on student learning. Brit J Educ Technol. 42:719–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland B. 2012. Informal learning in hospital corridors: implications for design and technology – a pilot study. Melbourne: LEaRN, University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Dori Y, Belcher J. 2004. How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts. J Learn Sci. 14:243–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy F. 2008. Work and the city. London: Black Dog Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy F, Craig C, Gillen N. 2011. Purpose, process, place: design as a research tool. Facilities. 29:97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy F, Worthington J. 1972. Designing for changing needs. Built Environ. 1:458–463.
   Google Scholar
• Dugdale S. 2009. Space strategies for the new learning landscape. Educause Rev. 44:50–63.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser K. 2014. The future of learning and teaching in next generation learning spaces. Int Perspect High Educ Res. 12:xv–xxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison A, Hutton L. 2014. Design for the changing educational landscape: space, place and the future of learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmelman M. 2014. In redesigned room, hospital patients may feel better already. Art & Design in New York Times. August 21.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. 2006. Evaluating training programs. The four levels. San Francisco (CA): Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kitto S, Nordquist J, Peller J, Grant R, Reeves S. 2013. The disconnections between space, place and learning in interprofessional education: an overview of key issues. J Interprof Care. 27:5–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KvanT. 2013. Evaluating learning environments for interprofessional care. J Interprof Care. 27:31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordenström J, Kiessling A, Nordquist J. 2013. Building for change: university hospital design for future clinical learning. J Interprof Care. 27:72–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordquist J, Kitto S, Reeves S. 2013a. “Living museums”: is it time to reconsider the learning landscape for professional and interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 27:2–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordquist J, Sundberg K, Kitto S, Ygge J, Reeves S. 2013b. Future learning environments: the advent of a “spatial turn”? J Interprof Care. 27:77–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordquist J, Sundberg K. 2012. An educational leadership responsibility in primary care: ensuring the physical space for learning aligns with the educational mission. Educ Primary Care. 24:45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Nordquist, J, Laing A. 2015. Designing spaces for the networked learning landscape. Med Teach. 37:337–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordquist J. 2016. Alignment achieved? The learning landscape and curricula in health professions education. Med Educ. 50:61–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oblinger D. 2006. Learning spaces. Educause ebook; [cited 2015 Nov 23]. Available from: http://educause.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Preiser WFE, Rabinowitz HZ, White ET 1988. Post occupancy evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Prideaux D. 2003. Curriculum design. BMJ. 326:268–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringstedt C, Hodges B, Scherpbier A. 2011. ‘The research compass’: an introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 56. Med Teach. 33:695–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple P, editor. 2014. The physical university: contours of space and place in higher education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Temple P. 2007. Learning spaces for the 21st century: a review of the literature. London: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Temple P. 2008. Learning spaces in higher education: an under-researched topic. Lond Rev Educ. 6:229–241.
   Google Scholar
• Thody A. 2011. ‘Learning Landscapes’ as shared vocabulary for learning spaces. In: Boddington A, Boys J, editors. Re-shaping learning: a critical reader: the future of learning spaces in post-compulsory education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. p. 121–136.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Zhu X, DuBose J, Seo HB, Choi YS, Quan X, Joseph A, 2008. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Herd-Health Environ Res Des J. 1:61–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich R. 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science. 224:420–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside A, Brooks C, Walker J. 2010. Making the case for space: three years of empirical research on learning environments. Educ Q 33. Available from: http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/making-case-space-three-years-empirical-research-learning-environments
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside A, Frizgerald S. 2009a. Designing spaces for active learning. Implications. 7:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside A, Jom L, Duin A, Fritzgerald S. 2009b. Using the PAIR-up model to evaluate active learning spaces. Educause Q. 32. Available from: http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/using-pair-model-evaluate-active-learning-spaces
   Google Scholar