Speech Output Technologies in Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Scoping Review

References

• *Achmadi, D., Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Sutherland, D., … & Sigafoos, J. (2012). Teaching advanced operation of an iPod-based speech generating device to two students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1258–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Achmadi, D., Sigafoos, J., van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., … & Marchik, P. B. (2014). Acquisition, preference, and follow-up data on the use of three AAC options by four boys with developmental disability/delay. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 565–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angermeier, K., Schooley, K., Harasymowycz, U., & Schlosser, R. W. (2010). The role of fingerspelled self-cues during spelling with a speech generating device by a child with autism: A brief report. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22, 197–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). Cochrane update: ‘Scoping the Scopes’ of a Cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33, 147–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Banda, D. R., Coople, K. S., Koul, R. K., Sancribian, S. L., & Boschutz, R. J. (2010). Video modeling interventions to teach spontaneous requesting using AAC devices to individuals with autism: A preliminary investigation. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, 1364–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., & Judge, S. (2012). Interventions using high-technology communication devices: A state of the art review. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 64, 137–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Beck, A., Stoner, J., Bock, S., Parton, T. (2008). Comparison of PECS and the use of a VOCA: A replication. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 198–216.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Blischak, D. M., & Schlosser, R. W. (2003). Use of technology to support independent spelling by students with autism. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 292–302.
   Google Scholar
• *Boesch, M. C., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., & Hsu, N. (2013a). Comparative efficacy of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on social-communicative skills and speech development. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 197–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Boesch, M. C., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., & Hsu, N. (2013b). Comparative efficacy of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on requesting skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 480–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Brady, N. (2000). Improved comprehension of object names following voice output communication aid use: Two case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, L. A. (2012). The effect of a peer-mediated intervention on the communicative behavior of adolescents with autism using a dynamic display voice output communication aid. (Order No. AAI 1502934, Masters Abstracts International, 1419).
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E. G., Binkoff, J. A., Kologinsky, E., & Eddy, M. (1978). Acquisition of sign language by autistic children. I: Expressive labeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 489–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkley, J., Reldy, L., Chantier, S., Hodge, N., & Holmes, K. (2010). What children on the autism spectrum have to ‘say’ about using high-tech voice output communication aids (VOCAs) in an educational setting. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 4, 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Checkley, R., Reldy, L., Chantier, S., Hodge, N., & Holmes, K. (2012). “Black white zebra orange orange:” How children with autism make use of computer-based voice output communication aides in their language and communication at school. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 6, 245–258.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• *Couper, L., van der Meer, L., Schaefer, M. C. M., McKenzie, E., McLay, L., O’Reilly, M. F., …. & Sutherland, D. (2014). Comparing acquisition of and preference for manual signs, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices in nine children with autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, M., Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1990). Age and gender preferences for synthetic and natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 256–261.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K. R., Clark-Serpentine, E. A., Johnson, K. E., & Roeser, J. L. (2006). Accuracy of repetition of digitized and synthesized speech for young children in background noise. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 155–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K. R., & Finke, E. H. (2012). Intelligibility of children's speech in digitized speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 181–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K. R., Reichle, J. (2001). Effects of age and divided attention on listeners’ comprehension of synthesized speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K. R., Reichle, J., & Pinkoski, C. (2010). Synthesized speech output and children: A scoping review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 259–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, S. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1992). Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: A review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Speech, 35, 351–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, V. M. (1993). Functional communication training using assistive devices: Effects on challenging behavior and affect. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 168–176.
   Google Scholar
• *Durand, V. M. (1999). Functional communication training using assistive devices: Recruiting natural communities of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 247–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dyches, T. T. (1998). Effects of switch training on the communication of children with autism and severe disabilities. Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 151–162.
   Google Scholar
• *Ferris, K. J., & Fabrizio, M. A. (2008). Comparison of error correction procedures involving a speech-generating device to teach a child with autism new tacts. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology & Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• *Flores, M., Musgrove, K., Renner, S., Hinton, V., Strozier, S., Franklin, S., & Hill, D. (2012). A comparison of communication using the Apple iPad and a picture-based communication system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 74–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Franco, J. H., Lang, R. L., O’Reilly, M. F., Chan, J. M., Sigafoos, J., & Rispoli, M. (2009). Functional analysis and treatment of inappropriate vocalizations using a speech-generating device for a child with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 146–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ganz, J. B., Hong, E. R., & Goodwynn, F. D. (2013). Effectiveness of the PECS Phase III App and choice between the app and traditional PECS among preschoolers with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 973–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Wolery, M. (1988). Parallel treatments design: A nested single subject design for comparing instructional procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 270–285.
   Google Scholar
• Gorenflo, C. W., Gorenflo, D. W., & Santer, S. A. (1994). Effects of synthetic voice output on attitudes toward the augmented communicator. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 64–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Granlund, M., & Olsson, C. (1999). Efficacy of communication intervention for presymbolic communicators. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, & Kim (2012). Effect sizes in research: Univariate and multivariate applications (2nd edn). Routledge: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, A., Schlosser, R. W., Gygi, B., Shane, H. C., Kong, Y.-Y., Book, L, … & Hearn, E. (2014). The effects of environmental sounds on the naming of animated AAC graphic symbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 298–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley, B., & Balandin, S. (2014). A metasynthesis of patient-provider communication in hospital for patients with severe communication disabilities: Informing new translational research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 329–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. C., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M., Mulloy, A., … & Sigafoos, J. (2010). Behavioral intervention promotes successful use of an iPod-based communication device by an adolescent with autism. Clinical Case Studies, 9, 328–338.
   Google Scholar
• *Kagohara, D. M., van, der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., … & Sigafoos, J. (2012). Teaching picture naming to two adolescents with autism spectrum disorders using systematic instruction and speech-generating devices. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1224–1233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., … & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kasari, C., Kaiser, A., Goods, K., Nietfeld, J., & Mathy, P. (2014). Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. Journal of the American Academic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53, 635–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *King, M. L., Takeguchi, K., Barry, S. E., Rehfeldt, R. A., Boyer, V. E., & Matthews, T. L. (2014). Evaluation of the iPad in the acquisition of requesting skills for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1107–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K. (2003). Perception of synthetic speech in individuals with and without disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 49–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Allen, G. D. (1993). Segmental intelligibility and speech interference thresholds of high quality synthetic speech in the presence of noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 790–798.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Clapsaddle, K. (2006). Effects of repeated listening experiences on the recognition of synthetic speech by individuals with mild-to-moderate intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 112–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Dembowski, J. (2010). Synthetic speech perception in individuals with intellectual and communicative disabilities. In S. Stern & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Computer synthesized speech technologies: Tools for aiding impairment (pp. 177–187). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Hanners, J. (1997). Word identification and sentence verification of two synthetic speech systems by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Hester, K. (2006). Effects of repeated listening experiences on the recognition of synthetic speech by individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech-Language and Hearing Research, 49, 47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., … & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse at http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Cuvo, A. J., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., & Didden, R. (2007). PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: an overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R., Regester, A., Rispoli, M., Pimentel, S., & Camargo, S. H. (2010). Rehabilitation issues for children with autism spectrum disorders. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 153–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. C., Roberts, B., Dimarco, R., & Greiner, N. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 153–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Fuller, D. R., & Arvidson, H. H. (Eds.) (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• *Lorah, E. R., Crouser, J., Gilroy, S. P., Tincani, M., & Hantula, D. (2014). Within stimulus prompting to teach symbol discrimination using an iPad® speech generating device. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 335–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lorah, E. R., Tincani, M., Dodge, J., Gilroy, S., Hickey, A., & Hantula, D. (2013). Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad™ as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25, 637–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magiati, I., Tay, X. W., & Howlin, P. (2014). Cognitive, language, social and behavioural outcomes in adults with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review of longitudinal follow-up studies in adulthood. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 73–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McLay, L., Van der Meer, L., Schaefer, M. C. M., Couper, L., McKenzie, E., O’Reilly, M. F., … & Sutherland, D. (2014). Comparing acquisition, generalization, maintenance, and preference across three AAC options in four children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Physical and Developmental Disabilities, DOI 10.1007/s10882-014-9417-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McMillan J. (2008). Teachers make it happen: From professional development to integration of augmentative and alternative communication technologies in the classroom. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 32, 199–211.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matson, J. L., Kozlowski, A. M., & Matson, M. M. (2012). Speech deficits in persons with autism: etiology and symptom presentation. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 573–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, D., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2001). Autism, augmentative communication, and assistive technology: What do we really know? Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 141–151.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1987). A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1990). A comparison of intelligibility among natural speech and seven synthesizers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Schuler, A. (1988). Augmenting communication for persons with autism: Issues and strategies. Topics in Language Disorders, 9, 24–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., Wilk, D., & Carson, P. (2000). A retrospective analysis of technology use patterns of students with autism over a 5-year period. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15, 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K. (1997). Use of VOCA in children with intellectual disabilities and/or autistic tendencies: Observations of VOCA play settings and speech abilities in two special schools. Japanese Journal of Special Education, 35, 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• *Olive, M., de la Cruz, B., Davis, T. N., Chan, J. M., Lang, R. B., O’Reilly, M. F., & Dickson, S. M. (2007). The effects of enhanced milieu teaching and a voice output communication aid on the requesting of three children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1505–1513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Olive, M., Lang, R., & Davis, T. (2008). An analysis of the effects of functional communication and a voice output communication aid for a child with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, C., & La Sorte, D. (1993). The effects of computers with synthesized speech and no speech on the spontaneous communication of children with autism. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 21, 12–31.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkoski-Ball, C. L., Reichle, J., & Munson, B. (2012). Synthesized speech intelligibility and early preschool-age children: Comparing accuracy for single-word repetition with repeated exposure. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 293–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispoli, M. J., Franco, J. H., van der Meer, L., Lang, R., & Camargo, S. (2010). The use of speech generating devices in interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 276–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Roche, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Schlosser, R. W., Stevens, M., … & Marschik, P. B. (2014). An evaluation of speech production in two boys with neurodevelopmental disorders who received communication intervention with a speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 38, 10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai, S. (1997). Teaching communication using Voice Output Communication Aids (VOCA) for autistic children. Japanese Journal of Special Education, 34, 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• *Schepis, M. M., Reid, D. H., Behrmann, M. M., & Sutton, K. A. (1998). Increasing communicative interactions of young children with autism using a voice output communication aid and naturalistic teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 561–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1999). Comparative efficacy of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2003). Roles of speech output in augmentative and alternative communication: Narrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 5–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Belfiore, P. J., Nigam, R., Blischak, D., & Hetzroni, O. (1995). The effects of speech output technology in the learning of graphic symbols. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 537–549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Blischak, D. M. (2001). Is there a role for speech output in interventions for persons with autism? A review. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 170–178.
   Google Scholar
• *Schlosser, R. W., & Blischak, D. M. (2004). Effects of speech and print feedback on spelling in children with autism. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 848–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Schlosser, R. W., Blischak, D., M., Belfiore, P. J., Bartley, C., & Barnett, N. (1998). The effects of synthetic speech output and orthographic feedback on spelling in a student with autism: A preliminary study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 319–329.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Koul, R., Shane, H., Sorce, J., Brock, K., Harmon, A., … & Hearn, E. (2014). Effects of animation on naming and identification across two graphic symbols sets representing actions and prepositions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 1779–1791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Lee, D. L., & Wendt, O. (2008). Application of the Percentage of Non-overlapping Data in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, 163–187.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Laubscher, E., Sorce, J., Koul, R., Flynn, S., Hotz, … & Shane, H. (2013). Implementing directives that involve prepositions with children with autism: A comparison of spoken cues with two types of augmented input. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 132–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. & Raghavendra, P. (2004). Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Raghavendra, P., Sigafoos, J., Koul, R., & Shane, H. (2014). Augmentative and alternative communication. In J. L. Luiselli (Ed.), Children and youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): Recent advances and innovations in assessment, education, and intervention (pp. 101–122). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H., Sorce, J., Koul, R., Bloomfield, E., Debrowski, L., … & Neff, A. (2012). Animation of graphic symbols representing verbs and prepositions: Effects on transparency, name agreement, and identification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 342–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Sigafoos, J. (2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 102–123.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Sigafoos, J. (2006). Augmentative and alternative communication interventions for persons with developmental disabilities: Narrative review of comparative single-subject experimental studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Sigafoos, J., & Koul, R. (2009). Speech output and speech generating devices in autism spectrum disorders. In P. Mirenda & T. Iacono (Eds.), Autism Spectrum Disorders and AAC (pp. 141–170). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• *Schlosser, R. W., Sigafoos, J., Luiselli, J., Angermeier, K., Schooley, K., Harasymowyz, U., & Belfiore, J. (2007). Effects of synthetic speech output on requesting and natural speech production in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 139–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Not all systematic reviews are created equal: considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 138–150.
   Google Scholar
• Scotti, J. R., Evans, I. M., Meyer, L. H., & Walker, P. (1991). A meta analysis of intervention research with problem behavior: Treatment validity and standards of practice. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 233–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single subject research methodology: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Cook, S. B., & Escobar, C. (1986). Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 260–271.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C. (2006). Using visual scene displays to improve communication and communication instruction for persons with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C., Laubscher, E., Schlosser, R. W., Flynn, S., Sorce, J. F., & Abramson, J. (2012). Applying technology to visually support language and communication in individuals with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1228–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., & O’Reilly, M. (2003). Effects of speech output on maintenance of requesting and frequency of vocalizations in three children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 37–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Sigafoos, J., Drasgow, E., Halle, J. W., O’Reilly, M. O., Seely-York, S., Edrisinha, C., & Andrews, A. (2004). Teaching VOCA use as a communicative repair strategy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 411–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sigafoos, J., Green, V., Payne, D., Son, S., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. (2009). A comparison of picture exchange and speech-generating devices: Acquisition, preference, and effects on social interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., Ganz, J., Lancioni, G., & Schlosser, R. W. (2005). Supporting self-determination in AAC interventions by assessing preference for communication devices. Technology & Disability, 17, 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• *Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., Seely-York, S., & Edrisinha, C. (2004). Teaching students with developmental disabilities to locate their AAC device. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• *Son, S. H., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. E. (2006). Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 389–395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Still, K., Rehfeldt, R. A., Whelan, R., May, R., & Dymond, S. (2014). Facilitating requesting skills using high-tech augmentative and alternative communication devices with individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1184–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Strasberger, S. K., & Ferreri, S. J. (2014). The effects of peer-assisted communication application training on the communicative and social behaviors of children with autism. Journal of Physical and Developmental Disabilities, 26, 513–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H., Rogers, S., Cooper, J., Landa, R., Lord, C., Paul, R., … & Yoder, P. (2009). Defining spoken language benchmarks and selecting measures of expressive language development for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 643–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunberg, G., Ahlsen, E., & Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (2007). Children with autistic spectrum disorders and speech generating devices: Communication in different activities at home. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21, 457–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Trembath, D., Balandin, S., Togher, L., & Stancliffe, R. (2009). Peer mediated teaching and augmentative and alternative communication for preschool-aged children with autism. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34, 173–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Trottier, N., Kamp, L., & Mirenda, P. (2011). Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 26–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Cooijmans, M., Didden, R., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., … & Sigafoos, J. (2015). An iPad-based intervention for teaching picture and word matching to a student with ASD and severe communication impairment. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27, 67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van der Meer, L., Didden, R., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). Comparing three augmentative and alternative communication modes for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24, 451–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van der Meer, L., Kagohara, D. M., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., Herrington, C., Sigafoos, J.,… & Rispoli, M. (2011). Teaching functional use of an iPod-based speech-generating device to individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• *van der Meer, L., Kagohara, D. M., Achmadi, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Sutherland, D., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). Speech-generating devices versus manual signing for children with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1658–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van der Meer, L., Kagohara, D., Roche, L., Sutherland, D., Balandin, S., Green, V. A., … & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 222–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., & Rispoli, M. (2010). Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 294–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1247–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatagiri, H. S., & Ramabadran, T. (1995). Digital speech synthesis: A tutorial. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, V. L., & Snell, M. E. (2013). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication and challenging behavior: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 117–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, O. (2006). The effectiveness of augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, O., & Miller, B. (2012). Quality appraisal of single- subject experimental designs: An overview and comparison of different appraisal tools. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 109–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills, T., Bunnell, H.T., & Patel, R. (2014). Towards personalized speech synthesis for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 226–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. P. (2011). Synthesis of single-case design research in communication sciences and disorders: Challenges, strategies, and future directions, Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 5, 104–115.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, P. J., Tostanoski, A. H., & Sandback, M. P. (2014). Adding modeled speech-generating device use to a naturalistic language intervention facilitates generalized communicative spoken utterances immediately after treatment and generalized gains on declarative use 12 weeks after treatment ends in children with ASD who began treatment in the “word combination” stage. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8, 157–162.
   Google Scholar