What We Write about When We Write About AAC: The Past 30 Years of Research and Future Directions

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2015a). Aphasia (Practice Portal). www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Aphasia/
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2015b). Autism (Practice Portal). www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Autism/
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., Balandin, S., & Clendon, S. (2011). “He cares about me and I care about him.” Children’s experiences of friendship with peers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelo, D. H., Kokoska, S. M., & Jones, S. D. (1996). Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of adolescents and young adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D., Jones, S., & Kokoska, S. (1995). Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 193–202.
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., & Goldbart, J. (2011). Qualitative research and AAC: Strong methods and new topics. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 227–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., & Iacono, T. (1999). Crews, wusses, and whoppas: Core and fringe vocabularies of Australian meal-break conversations in the workplace. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 95–109.
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., & Morgan, J. (1997). Adults with cerebral palsy: What’s happening? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 22, 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., & Morgan, J. (2001). Preparing for the future: Aging and alternative and augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Stoner, J. B., & Dennis, M. L. (2009). An investigation of aided language stimulation: Does it increase AAC use with adults with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 42–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. (1995). Limitations in the use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). The psychology of written composition. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. (1987). Strategies for involving parents in programs for young children using augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 90–93.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1985). “The weakest ink is better than the strongest memory.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1991). Magic and cost of communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1997). A learning experience. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 205–206.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and Alternative Communication (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Ball, L. J., & Fager, S. (2008). An AAC personnel framework: Adults with acquired complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 255–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Fager, S., Ball, L., & Dietz, A. (2007). AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 230–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Hux, K., Dietz, A., McKelvey, M., & Weissling, K. (2015). Using visual scene displays as communication support options for people with chronic, severe aphasia: A summary of AAC research and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 234–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Yorkston, K., & Smith, K. (1985). Third-party payer response to requests for purchase of communication augmentation systems: a study of Washington State. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Ball, L., Dietz, A., Kent-Walsh, J., Lasker, J., Lund, S., … Quach, W. (2012). Personnel roles in the AAC assessment process. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 278–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S., Williams, M. P., & Wilkins, D. P. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 191–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, M., Dijkstra, K., Burgio, L., & Allen-Burge, R. (2001). Memory aids as an augmentative and alternative communication strategy for nursing home residents with dementia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 196–210.
   Google Scholar
• Branson, D., & Demchak, M. (2009). The use of augmentative and alternative communication methods with infants and toddlers with disabilities: A research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 274–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brault, M. (2012). Americans with disabilities: 2010 (pp. 70–131). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Broberg, M., Ferm, U., & Thunberg, G. (2012). Measuring responsive style in parents who use AAC with their children: Development and evaluation of a new instrument. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 243–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N. (2008). Vocabulary to support socially-valued adult roles. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 294–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (2013). Use and acceptance of AAC systems by children with Angelman Syndrome. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 557–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency (2013). The world fact book 2013–14. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2177.html
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Y.-C., Carter, E. W., & Sisco, L. G. (2012). Social interactions of students with disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive classrooms. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 349–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collier, B., McGhie-Richmond, D., Odette, F., & Pyne, J. (2006). Reducing the risk of sexual abuse for people who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 62–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (1986). ISAAC in chains: The future of communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 140–145.
   Google Scholar
• Delarosa, E., Horner, S., Eisenberg, C., Ball, L., Renzoni, A. M., & Ryan, S. E. (2012). Family Impact of Assistive Technology Scale: Development of a measurement scale for parents of children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 171–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education, UK (2013). The future of AAC services in England – a framework for equitable and effective commissioning. http://www.communicationmatters.org.uk/dfe-aac-project
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Hux, K., McKelvey, M. L., Beukelman, D. R., & Weissling, K. (2009). Reading comprehension by people with chronic aphasia: A comparison of three levels of visuographic contextual support. Aphasiology, 23, 1053–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Thiessen, A., Griffith, J., Peterson, A., Sawyer, E., & McKelvey, M. (2013). The renegotiation of social roles in chronic aphasia: Finding a voice through AAC. Aphasiology, 27, 309–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D. R., & Light, J. C. (2010). A comparison of the performance of 5-year-old children with typical development using iconic encoding in AAC systems with and without icon prediction on a fixed display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrella, G. (2000). Confessions of a blabber finger. In M. Fried-Oken & H. Bersani (Eds.), Speaking up and spelling it out (pp. 31–45). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, L., & Fried-Oken, M. (1996). AAC Aphasiology: Partnership for future research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 257–271.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, K., Mirenda, P., & Phillips, G. (1996). Comparisons of five symbol assessment protocols with nondisabled preschoolers and learners with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Frankoff, D. J., & Hatfield, B. (2011). Augmentative and alternative communication in daily clinical practice: Strategies and tools for management of severe communication disorders. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 18, 112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., Beukelman, D. R., & Hux, K. (2012). Current and future AAC research considerations for adults with acquired cognitive and communication impairments. Assistive Technology, 24, 56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, D., & Lloyd, L. (1987). A study of physical and semantic characteristics of a graphic symbol system as predictors of perceived complexity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B. (2015). AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. L., Heath, A. K., Parker, R. I., Rispoli, M. J., & Duran, J. B. (2012). A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 60–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gona, J. K., Newton, C. R., Hartley, S., & Bunning, K. (2014). A home-based intervention using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) techniques in rural Kenya: What are the caregivers’ experiences? Child: Care, Health and Development, 40, 29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley, B., & Balandin, S. (2004). Without AAC: The stories of unpaid carers of adults with cerebral palsy and complex communication needs in hospital. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 243–258.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, O., & Lloyd, L. (2000). Shrinking Kim: Effects of active versus passive computer instruction on the learning of element and compound Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Drazek, A., Kowarsky, K., Scally, C., & Segal, E. (1994). Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech delivered at normal and slow presentation rates. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M. B. (1991). University students using augmentative and alternative communication in the USA: A demographic study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 231–239.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt-Berg, M. (2005). The Bridge School: Educational inclusion outcomes over 15 years. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 116–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., Alwell, M., & Goetz, L. (1991). Interacting with peers through conversation turn taking with a communication book adaptation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., Kristoffersson, L., Ferm, U., & Thunberg, G. (2011). The ComAlong communication boards: Parents’ use and experiences of aided language stimulation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 103–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Hasham, Z. (2010). Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & McNaughton, D. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K. A., Malani, M. D., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 271–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Lloyd, L. L. (1994). Survey of professional preparation in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in speech-language pathology and special education programs. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). “Communication is the essence of human life”: Reflections on communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1999). Do augmentative and alternative communication interventions really make a difference?: The challenges of efficacy research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Binger, C., & Kelford Smith, A. (1994). Story reading interactions between preschoolers who use AAC and their mothers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985a). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I – Discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985b). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part II – Communicative function. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 98–107.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2008). Making a difference: A celebration of the 25th anniversary of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 175–193.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2015). Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londral, A., Pinto, A., Pinto, S., Azevedo, L., & De Carvalho, M. (2015). Quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients and caregivers: Impact of assistive communication from early stages. Muscle & Nerve, early on-line.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luftig, R., & Bersani, H. (1985). An investigation of two variables influencing Blissymbol learnability with nonhandicapped adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, C., Beukelman, D., & Bilyeu, D. (1994). Vocabulary-use patterns in preschool children: Effects of context and time sampling. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 224–236.
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M. A., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K. A., Graff, H., Marshak, L., Conners, N. A., … Cuenca-Sanchez, Y. (2009). What is published in the field of special education? An analysis of 11 prominent journals. Exceptional Children, 76, 95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, S., Vessoyan, K., & Duncan, B. (2012). Traditional versus computerized presentation and response methods on a structured AAC assessment tool. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, L. H. (2008). A declaration of a body of love. Houston, TX: Atahualpa Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Fallon, K., Tod, J., Weiner, F., & Neisworth, J. (1994). Effect of repeated listening experiences on the intelligibility of synthesized speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (1989). Teaching facilitators to support the communication skills of an adult with severe cognitive disabilities: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M. B., & Light, J. (2008). “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1993). AAC: Bonding the uncertain mosaic. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1996). Sheltered employment and augmentative communication: An oxymoron? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 193–197.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1998). AAC: coming of age or over the hill? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 197–199.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2000). Where have all the intervention studies gone? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 207–207.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (1987). A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Patient Provider Communication (2015). Medicare Funding of SGD/Gleason Act. Retrieved from http://www.patientprovidercommunication.org/article_58.htm
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, J. (2000). With communication, anything is possible. In M. Fried-Oken & H.A. Bersani (Eds.) Speaking up and spelling it out (pp. 207–214). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, D. C. (2013). Researchers and scholarly communications: An evolving interdependency. In D. Shorley & M. Jubb (Eds.), The future of scholarly communication. London, England, Facet Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rackensperger, T., Krezman, C., McNaughton, D., Williams, M. B., & D’Silva, K. (2005). “When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff”: The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, A., & Beukelman, D. (1995). Preprofessional preparation in augmentative and alternative communication: State-of-the-art report. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., & Green, V. A. (2015). Microswitch technology for enabling self-determined responding in children with profound and multiple disabilities: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 246–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M., Sevcik, R. A., Barton-Hulsey, A., & Whitmore, A. S. (2015). Early intervention and AAC: What a difference 30 years makes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 181–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. (1990). Communication in the classroom for children with dual sensory impairments: Studies of teacher and child behavior. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 262–274.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. (2000). Tangible symbols, tangible outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Campbell, E. M., Htun, A. T., Bailey, L. J., & Millar, C. J. (2008). We are what we do: Research outputs of public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 380–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Koul, R. K. (2015). Speech output technologies in interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A scoping review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 285–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Sigafoos, J. (2009). Navigating evidence-based information sources in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 225–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (2005). The dual challenges of aided communication and adolescence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (2015). Language development of individuals who require aided communication: Reflections on state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 215–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, M. (2002). Using dynamic assessment with learners who communicate nonsymbolically. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 163–176.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, M. E., Brady, N., McLean, L., Ogletree, B. T., Siegel, E., Sylvester, L., … Sevcik, R. (2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 364–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soto, G., Hartmann, E., & Wilkins, D. P. (2006). Exploring the elements of narrative that emerge in the interactions between an 8-year-old child who uses an AAC device and her teacher. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 231–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Yu, B., & Kelso, J. (2008). Effectiveness of multifaceted narrative intervention on the stories told by a 12-year-old girl who uses AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stancliffe, R. J., Larson, S., Auerbach, K., Engler, J., Taub, S., & Lakin, K. C. (2010). Individuals with intellectual disabilities and augmentative and alternative communication: Analysis of survey data on uptake of aided AAC, and loneliness experiences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, S., Beukelman, D., & King, J. (1997). Vocabulary use during extended conversations by two cohorts of older adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, A., & Rönnberg, J. (2010). A qualitative analysis of email interactions of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 255–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, J. & Happ, M.B. (2014). Participation in informed consent by critically ill patients can be enhanced by augmentative communication. In C106. Interprofessional topics in the provision of critical care. E (Vols. 1–271, pp. A5241–A5241). American Thoracic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Trottier, N., Kamp, L., & Mirenda, P. (2011). Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 26–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatagiri, H. (1994a). Effect of sentence length and exposure on the intelligibility of synthesized speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 96–104.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatagiri, H. (1994b). Effect of window size on rate of communication in a lexical prediction AAC system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatagiri, H. (1999). Efficient keyboard layouts for sequential access in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 126–134.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Carlin, M., & Jagaroo, V. (2006). Preschoolers’ speed of locating a target symbol under different color conditions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (2000). More than an exception to the rule. In M. Fried-Oken & H.A. Bersani, Jr (Eds.), Speaking up and spelling it out (pp. 246–254). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2004). Confessions of a multi-modal man. Alternatively Speaking, 7(1), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. B., Krezman, C., & McNaughton, D. (2008). “Reach for the stars”: Five principles for the next 25 years of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 194–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovetich, W., & Young, T. (1988). The effects of representativeness and concreteness on the “guessability” of Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Kangas, K., & Lloyd, L. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication: A field in transition. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Lloyd, L., & Vicker, B. (1994). Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 27–59.
   Google Scholar