Stakeholders’ perception of the nutrition and health claim regulation

References

• Anderson RE. 1973. Consumer dissatisfaction: the effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. J Mark Res 10:38–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astley SB, Elliott RM. 2007. The European Nutrigenomics Organisation: linking genomics, nutrition and health research. J Sci Food Agric 87:1180–1184
   Google Scholar
• Bast A, Briggs WM, Calabrese EJ, Fenech MF, Hanekamp JC, Heaney R, Rijkers G, et al. 2013. Scientism, legalism and precaution-contending with regulating nutrition and health claims in Europe. EFFL 8:401–409
   Google Scholar
• Blumberg J, Heaney RP, Huncharek M, Scholl T, Stampfer M, Vieth R, Weaver CM, Zeisel SH. 2010. Evidence-based criteria in the nutritional context. Nutr Rev 68:478–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremmers H, van der Meulen B, Purnhagen K. 2013. Multi-stakeholder responses to the European Union health claims requirements. J Chain Network Sci 13:161–172
   Google Scholar
• de Boer A, Vos E, Bast A. 2014. Implementation of the nutrition and health claim regulation – the case of antioxidants. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 68:475–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean M, Lampila P, Shepherd R, Arvola A, Saba A, Vassallo M, Claupein E, et al. 2012. Perceived relevance and foods with health-related claims. Food Qual Prefer 24:129–135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF. 2006. The qualitative research interview. Med Educ 40:314–321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Editorial. 2009. What is health? The ability to adapt. Lancet 373:781
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2012. “General function” health claims under Article 13. Available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/article13.htm. Accessed on 11 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2013. EFSA: FAQ on nutrition and health claims. Available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/faqs/faqnutrition.htm?wtrl=01. Accessed on 11 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2014a. About the NDA Panel and the Nutrition Unit. Available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/nda/aboutnda.htm. Accessed on 11 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2014b. Claims on disease risk reduction and child development or health under Article 14. Available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/article14.htm. Accessed on 11 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2014c. “New function” health claims under Article 13.5. Available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/article13-5.htm. Accessed on 11 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2014d. Nutrition and health claims. Available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/nutrition.htm. Accessed on 11 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• Elliott R, Pico C, Dommels Y, Wybranska I, Hesketh J, Keijer J. 2007. Nutrigenomic approaches for benefit-risk analysis of foods and food components: defining markers of health. Br J Nutr 98:1095–1100
   Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young. 2012. External evaluation of EFSA – final report. Available at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/keydocs/docs/efsafinalreport.pdf. Accessed on 20 October 2014
   Google Scholar
• Europe Press Releases. 2006. Questions and answers on health and nutrition claims. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-06-200_en.htm?locale=en. Accessed on 04 April 2013
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 of 16 May 2012 establishing a list of permitted health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health. OJ L 55:1–40
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. EU Register on nutrition and health claims. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/nuhclaims/?event=search&CFID=335086&CFTOKEN=bb484f431b227bd1-79366084-B936-26BA-A093EC372F6F1B31&jsessionid=9312c835f5666f4342c4403366511152f434TR. Accessed on 11 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council. 2002. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. OJ L 31:1–24
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. OJ L 404:9–25
   Google Scholar
• Festinger L. 1962. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Finardi C, Pellegrini G, Rowe G. 2012. Food safety issues: from enlightened elitism towards deliberative democracy? An overview of EFSA’s “Public Consultation” instrument. Food Policy 37:427–438
   Google Scholar
• Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman
   Google Scholar
• Frewer L, Salter B. 2002. Public attitudes, scientific advice and the politics of regulatory policy: the case of BSE. Sci Public Policy 29:137–145
   Google Scholar
• Gilsenan M. 2011. Nutrition & health claims in the European Union: a regulatory overview. Trends Food Sci Technol 22:536–542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray N. 2013. Most consumers don’t know what EFSA is, experts find. Available at: http://www.nutraingredients.com/Consumer-Trends/Most-consumers-don-t-know-what-EFSA-is-experts-find. Accessed on 11 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, Ronis DL. 1978. Twenty years of cognitive dissonance: case study of the evolution of a theory. Psychol Rev 85:53–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham N, Rees J. 1997. Industry self-regulation: an institutional perspective. Law Policy 19:363–414
   Google Scholar
• Haufler V. 2001. A public role for the private sector: Industry self-regulation in a global economy. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment
   Google Scholar
• Heaney RP. 2008. Nutrients, endpoints, and the problem of proof. J Nutr 138:1591–1595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoad D. 2011. Scientific Method and the Regulation of Health and Nutritional Claims by the European Food Safety Authority. Bull Sci Technol Soc 31:123–133
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, Horst HVD, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, Leonard B, et al. 2011. How should we define health? Br Med J 343:d4163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen KK, Sandøe P. 2002. Food safety and ethics: the interplay between science and values. J Agric Environ Ethics 15:245–253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuringsraad. 2014. Database claimsverordening. Available at: http://keuringsraad.nl/Database-claimsverordening-en-indicatieve-lijst. Accessed on 29 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• Klintman M, Kronsell A. 2010. Challenges to legitimacy in food safety governance? The case of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Eur Integr 32:309–327
   Google Scholar
• Kobusch A. 2010. Linking the levels: independence and influence in the European two-tiered network of food safety agencies. Third Biennial Conference “Regulation in the Age of Crises” of the ECPR Standing Group on Regulatory Governance, Dublin. Available at: https://doi.org/http://regulation.upf.edu/dublin-10-papers/3D2.pdf. Accessed on 17 November 2014
   Google Scholar
• Kussmann M, Raymond F, Affolter M. 2006. OMICS-driven biomarker discovery in nutrition and health. J Biotechnol 124:758–787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levidow L, Carr S. 2007. Europeanising advisory expertise: the role of ‘independent, objective and transparent’ scientific advice in agri-biotech regulation. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 26:880–895
   Google Scholar
• Lucas SR. 2014. Beyond the existence proof: ontological conditions, epistemological implications, and in-depth interview research. Qual Quantity 48:387–408
   Google Scholar
• Malloy TF. 2003. Regulation, compliance and the firm. Temple Law Rev 76:451–532
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield E. 1991. Academic research and industrial innovation. Res Policy 20:1–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason M. 2010. Sample size and saturation in PhD Studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Soc Res 11: Art 8
   Google Scholar
• Mathioudakis B. 2013. Presentation International Conference. Botanicals in food supplements, Rome. Available at: http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_EventiStampa_163_intervisteRelatori_itemInterviste_8_fileAllegatoIntervista.pdf. Accessed on 20 October 2014
   Google Scholar
• Menozzi D, Halawany-Darson R, Mora C, Giraud G. In press. Motives towards traceable food choice: a comparison between French and Italian consumers. Food Control 49:40–48
   Google Scholar
• Mitra A, Hastak M, Ford GT, Ringold DJ. 1999. Can the educationally disadvantaged interpret the FDA-mandated nutrition facts panel in the presence of an implied health claim? J Public Policy Mark 18:106–117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors EH. 2012. Functional foods: regulation and innovations in the EU. Innovation 25:424–440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NDA Panel EFSA. 2009. Scientific opinion on water-soluble tomato concentrate (WSTC I and II) and platelet aggregation Scientific substantiation of a health claim related to water-soluble tomato concentrate (WSTC I and II) and platelet aggregation pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J 1101:1–15
   Google Scholar
• NDA Panel EFSA. 2010. Scientific opinion on the modification of the authorisation of a health claim related to water-soluble tomato concentrate and helps to maintain a healthy blood flow and benefits circulation pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 following a request in accordance with Article 19 of the Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J 8:1689
   Google Scholar
• NDA Panel EFSA. 2012. Scientific opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to cocoa flavanols and maintenance of normal endothelium-dependent vasodilation pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J 10:2809
   Google Scholar
• Nelson R. 1993. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford, New York, Toronto: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• NVWA. 2014. Claims levensmiddelen – Preventief toetsen gezondheidsclaims bij Keuringsraad. Available at: http://www.vwa.nl/onderwerpen/regels-voor-ondernemers-eten-en-drinken/dossier/claims-levensmiddelen/gezondheidsclaims-correct-gebruik/preventief-toetsen-gezondheidsclaims-bij-keuringsraad. Accessed on 29 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• Oliver RL. 1980. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Mark Res 17:460–469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellis L, van Erk MJ, van Ommen B, Bakker GC, Hendriks HF, Cnubben NH, Kleemann R, et al. 2012. Plasma metabolomics and proteomics profiling after a postprandial challenge reveal subtle diet effects on human metabolic status. Metabolomics 8:347–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Lewis J. 2003. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Roe B, Levy AS, Derby BM. 1999. The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: results from FDA experimental data. J Public Policy Mark 18:89–105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreider J, Barrow C, Birchfield N, Dearfield K, Devlin D, Henry S, Kramer M, et al. 2010. Enhancing the credibility of decisions based on scientific conclusions: transparency is imperative. Toxicol Sci 116:5–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silano M, Silano V. 2008. The fifth anniversary of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA): mission, organization, functioning and main results. Fitoterapia 79:149–160
   Google Scholar
• Tansey O. 2007. Process tracing and elite interviewing: a case for non-probability sampling. PS 40:765–772
   Google Scholar
• Teisl MF, Levy AS. 1997. Does nutrition labeling lead to healthier eating? J Food Distrib Res 28:18–27
   Google Scholar
• van Ommen B, Keijer J, Heil SG, Kaput J. 2009. Challenging homeostasis to define biomarkers for nutrition related health. Mol Nutr Food Res 53:795–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ommen B, Stierum R. 2002. Nutrigenomics: exploiting systems biology in the nutrition and health arena. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13:517–521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Trijp H, Van der Lans IA. 2007. Consumer perceptions of nutrition and health claims. Appetite 48:305–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen H, Vos E, Francl S, Heinonen M, van Loveren H. 2010. Status of nutrition and health claims in Europe. Arch Biochem Biophys 501:6–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb WM, Worchel S. 1993. Prior experience and expectation in the context of crowding. J Pers Soc Psychol 65:512–521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weseler AR, Bast A. 2012. Pleiotropic-acting nutrients require integrative investigational approaches: the example of flavonoids. J Agric Food Chem 60:8941–8946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 1999. Part 1: diagnosis and classificaion of diabetes mellitus. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1999/who_ncd_ncs_99.2.pdf. Accessed on 17 November 2014
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2006. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Available at: www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf. Accessed on 11 April 2014
   Google Scholar
• Williams P. 2005. Consumer understanding and use of health claims for foods. Nutr Rev 63:256–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff RB, Cadotte ER, Jenkins RL. 1983. Modeling consumer satisfaction processes using experience-based norms. J Mark Res 20:296–304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar