Peer-assisted learning: time for nomenclature clarification

References

• Topping KJ, Ehly SW. Peer-assisted learning. 1998; xviii Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates. 371.
   Google Scholar
• Hill E, Liuzzi F, Giles J. Peer-assisted learning from three perspectives: student, tutor and co-ordinator. Clin Teach. 2010; 7: 244–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Topping KJ. Trends in peer learning. Educ Psychol. 2005; 25: 631–45.
   Google Scholar
• Boud D, Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J. Introduction: making the move to peer learning. Peer learning in higher education: learning from and with each other. 2001, 1–17; London: Kogan Page. editor.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrbeck CA, Ginsburg-Block MD, Fantuzzo JW, Miller TR. Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: a meta-analytic review. J Educ Psychol. 2003; 95: 240–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles M, Swanson R, Holton EI. The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. 2005; 6th ed, California: Elsevier Science and Technology Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ladyshewsky RK. Peer-assisted learning in clinical education: a review of terms and learning principles. J Phys Ther Educ. 2000; 14: 15.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Cate O, Durning S. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 546–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooloos JGM, Klaassen T, Vereijken M, Van Kuppeveld S, Bolhuis S, Vorstenbosch M. Collaborative group work: effects of group size and assignment structure on learning gain, student satisfaction and perceived participation. Med Teach. 2011; 33: 983–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams B, Reddy P. Does peer-assisted learning improve academic performance? A scoping review. Nurse Educ Today. 2016; 42: 23–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz EM, Le Blanc K, Dominici M, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, etal. Clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: the International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2005; 7: 393–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins B. Relationship between retention and peer tutoring for at-risk students. J Nurs Educ. 2004; 43: 319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel J, Rosentsveyg J, Gabbur N, Marquez S. Clay modeling for pelvic anatomy review for third-year medical and physician assistant students. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 19S–20S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh CM, Rose DN, Dubrowski A, Linq SC, Grierson LE, Backstein D, etal. Learning in the simulated setting: a comparison of expert-, peer-, and computer-assisted learning. Acad Med. 2011; 86(10 Suppl): S12–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard JH, O'Sullivan P, Palmer BJ, Qiu M, Kim EH. Peer assisted learning in surgical skills laboratory training: a pilot study. Med Teach. 2012; 34: 957–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nnodim JO. A controlled trial of peer-teaching in practical gross anatomy. Clin Anat. 1997; 10: 112–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele DJ, Medder JD, Turner P. A comparison of learning outcomes and attitudes in student-versus faculty-led problem-based learning: an experimental study. Med Educ. 2000; 34: 23–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassab S, Abu-Hijleh MF, Al-Shboul Q, Hamdy H. Student-led tutorials in problem-based learning: educational outcomes and students’ perceptions. Med Teach. 2005; 27: 521–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peets AD, Coderre S, Wright B, Jenkins D, Burak K, Leskosky S, etal. Involvement in teaching improves learning in medical students: a randomized cross-over study. BMC Med Educ. 2009; 9: 55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe M, Holschen M, Mooij SC, Sellei RM, Munker R, Antony P, etal. Knowledge transfer of spinal manipulation skills by student-teachers: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21: 992–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe M, Munker R, Sellei RM, Holschen M, Mooij SC, Schmidt-Rohlfing B, etal. Peer teaching: a randomised controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound. Med Educ. 2010; 44: 148–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor I. Peer assisted versus expert assisted learning: a comparison of effectiveness in terms of academic scores. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014; 24: 825–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprengel AD, Job L. Reducing student anxiety by using clinical peer mentoring with beginning nursing students. Nurse Educ. 2004; 29: 246–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blank WA, Blankenfeld H, Vogelmann R, Linde K, Schneider A. Can near-peer medical students effectively teach a new curriculum in physical examination?. BMC Med Educ. 2013; 13: 165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestel D, Kidd J. Peer assisted learning in patient-centred interviewing: the impact on student tutors. Med Teach. 2005; 27: 439–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolsgaard MG, Gustafsson A, Rasmussen MB, Hoiby P, Muller CG, Ringsted C. Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 553–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JG, Waldrep TD, Smith TG. Formal peer-teaching in medical school improves academic performance: the MUSC supplemental instructor program. Teach Learn Med. 2007; 19: 216–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobral D. Peer tutoring and student outcomes in a problem-based course. Med Educ. 1994; 28: 284–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes TC, Jiwaji Z, Lally K, Lloyd-Lavery A, Lota A, Dale A, etal. Advanced Cardiac Resuscitation Evaluation (ACRE): a randomised single-blind controlled trial of peer-led vs. expert-led advanced resuscitation training. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010; 18: 3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haist SA, Wilson JF, Fosson SE, Brigham NL. Are fourth-year medical students effective teachers of the physical examination to first-year medical students?. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12: 177–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannagan KB, Dellinger A, Thomas J, Mitchell D, Lewis-Trabeaux S, Dupre S. Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge. Nurse Educ Today. 2013; 33: 1440–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke J, Fayaz S, Graham K, Matthew R, Field M. Peer-assisted learning in the acquisition of clinical skills: a supplementary approach to musculoskeletal system training. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 577–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham K, Burke JM, Field M. Undergraduate rheumatology: can peer-assisted learning by medical students deliver equivalent training to that provided by specialist staff?. Rheumatology. 2008; 47: 652–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano SC. Randomized surgical training for medical students: resident versus peer-led teaching. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 542.e1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins GD, Hulme J, Bion JF. Peer-led resuscitation training for healthcare students: a randomised controlled study. Intensive Care Med. 2002; 28: 698–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans DJ, Cuffe T. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning. Anat Sci Educ. 2009; 2: 227–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyrich P, Celebi N, Schrauth M, Möltner A, Lammerding-Köppel M, Nikendei C. Peer-assisted versus faculty staff-led skills laboratory training: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ. 2009; 43: 113–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam JK, Tai J, Mitchell RD, Halley E, Vance S. A vertical study programme for medical students: peer-assisted learning in practice. Med Teach. 2013; 35: e943–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckmann JG, Dutsch M, Rauch C, Lang C, Weih M, Schwab S. Effects of peer-assisted training during the neurology clerkship: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Neurol. 2008; 15: 1365–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatt B, Greenberg L. A multi-level assessment of a program to teach medical students to teach. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007; 12: 7–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelder AJ, Rodrigues CM, Lin LY, Hickey PM, Johnson C, Elias JE. The role of students as teachers: four years’ experience of a large-scale, peer-led programme. Med Teach. 2010; 32: 547–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Burke JM, McAllister D, Lloyd DM. Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Med Educ. 2007; 41: 411–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson JN, Tonkin AL. Clinical skills education: outcomes of relationships between junior medical students, senior peers and simulated patients. Med Educ. 2008; 42: 901–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengier F, Rauch PJ, Partovi S, Kirsch J, Nawrotzki R. A three-day anatomy revision course taught by senior peers effectively prepares junior students for their national anatomy exam. Ann Anat. 2010; 192: 396–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams B, Olaussen A, Peterson EL. Peer-assisted teaching: an interventional study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015; 15: 293–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King A. ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: a model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educ Psychol. 1997; 32: 221–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders C, Smith A, Watson H, Nimmo A, Morrison M, Fawcett T, etal. The experience of interdisciplinary peer-assisted learning (PAL). Clin Teach. 2012; 9: 398–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar