Dutch land development institutions in the face of crisis: trembling pillars in the planners’ paradise

ABSTRACT

The international planning community has long regarded Dutch planning culture as atypical and even exemplary. This article claims that this common view might need revision, because of large changes that are taking place in planning and development practice. The three pillars of Dutch planning and development culture – integration (of land uses, actors and financial sources), comprehensiveness and the support of these by an active municipal land policy – are trembling. The crisis of 2008 has shown (rather than caused) that the large scale and interconnectedness of land-development projects have created a ‘tightly coupled system’ in which a shock in one part travels to other parts and causes the whole system to shake or even collapse. Organic forms of urban land development, with an open-ended plan, a greater role for smaller private actors and an enabling role for government, are better at allowing for adapting to changing circumstances. Experiments with organic development can be found in abundance, but whether this type of development will institutionalize in the long run and lead to a culture shift depends on the vitality of existing power structures.

KEYWORDS:

• Land development
• institutions
• planning system
• the Netherlands
• crisis

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 A (planning) style does not necessarily refer to (a set of) institutionalized actions; in theory it might concern a one-off action.

2 Some add the tactical level as an in-between level.

3 Since then, no such comprehensive research has been repeated. There have ‘only’ been publications in which elements of planning systems and cultures such as national spatial planning (Alterman, 2001), planning compensation (Alterman, 2010) and urban land readjustment (Hong & Needham, 2007) have been compared.

4 In the period between 1995 and 2011, only 845 Royal Decrees were issued to approve or to take a decision on compulsory purchases for planning purposes (Korthals Altes, 2014).

5 In 1999/2000, a government evaluation questionnaire, titled ‘Instruments for site development’, was distributed amongst all the municipalities within the perimeters of ‘urban development areas’ that took part in the state-incentivized adoption of a housing programme for the period 1995–2005. The results revealed, amongst others, the use of land development models (Groetelaers, 2004).