Dutch land development institutions in the face of crisis: trembling pillars in the planners’ paradise

References

• Alterman, R. (2001). National-level planning in democratic countries: An international comparison of city and regional policy-making. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alterman, R. (2010). Takings international: A comparative perspective on land use regulations and compensation rights. Chicago: ABA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L. (2010). Theorizing practice and practising theory: Outlines for an actor-relational-approach in planning. Planning Theory, 9, 28–62. doi:10.1177/1473095209346499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2011). Culture, planning and path dependence: Some reflections on the problems of comparison. Town Planning Review, 82, 13–28. doi:10.3828/tpr.2011.4
   Google Scholar
• Bregman, A. G., & de Win, R. W. J. J. (2005). Publiek-private samenwerking bij de ruimtelijke inrichting en haar exploitatie (Vol. 2, pp. 15–23). Deventer: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E. (2010). Cracks in the myth: Challenges to land policy in The Netherlands. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 101, 349–356. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00604.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Feenstra, S., Galle, M., Lekkerkerker, J., Sorel, N., & Tennekes, J. (2012). Vormgeven aan de spontane stad: belemmeringen en kansen voor organische stedelijke herontwikkeling [Report on organic urban development]. The Hague : PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency/Urhahn Urban Design.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Galle, M., & Sorel, N. (2011). Plan-led planning systems in development-led practices: An empirical analysis into the (lack of) institutionalisation of planning law. Environment and Planning A, 43, 928–941. doi:10.1068/a43400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Lagendijk, A., & Jacobs, W. (2007). A theory of institutional change: Illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy. Environment and Planning A, 39, 891–908. doi:10.1068/a38191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Sorel, N., Verwest, F., van Dongen, F., & Bregman, A. (2013). Gebiedsontwikkeling en commerciële vastgoedmarkten: een institutionele analyse van het (over)aanbod van winkels en kantoren. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency/Amsterdam School of Real Estate.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., & Witte, P. (2011). Financiering van gebiedsontwikkeling: een empirische analyse van grondexploitaties. Den Haag: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (1997). The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• De Klerk, L. (2008). De modernisering van de stad, 1850-1914. De opkomst van de planmatige stadsontwikkeling in Nederland. Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2013). Financiële situatie bij gemeentelijke grondbedrijven 2013. Utrecht: Author.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2006). Governance of territorial and urban policy from EU to local level, project 2.3.2. Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & van der Valk, A. (1994). Rule and order Dutch planning doctrine in the twentieth century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Feagin, J. R. (1988). Free enterprise city: Houston in political and economic perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groetelaers, D. A. (2004). Instrumentarium locatieontwikkeling: sturingsmogelijkheden voor gemeenten in een veranderende marktsituatie. Delft: DUP.
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. (2001). Planning and the intelligence of institutions: Interactive approaches to territorial policy-making between institutional design and institution building. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, S., Henneberry, J., & Rowley, S. (2002). Development cultures and urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 39, 1181–1196. doi:10.1080/00420980220135554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Zonneveld, W. (2000). Spatial planning in the network society – rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 8(3), 337–355. doi:10.1080/713666411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2014). Cities of tomorrow. An intellectual history of urban planning and design since 1880. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2004). The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 45–67. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y.-H., & Needham, B. (Eds.). (2007). Analyzing land readjustment: Economics, law and collective action. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2009). Planning cultures in Europe: Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Korthals Altes, W. K. (2010). The financial estimates and results of servicing land in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37, 929–941. doi:10.1068/b36027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthals Altes, W. K. (2014). Taking planning seriously: Compulsory purchase for urban planning in the Netherlands. Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 41(Part A, December), 71–80. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677
   Google Scholar
• Lefcoe, G. (1978). When governments become land developers: Notes on the public-sector experience in the Netherlands & California. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Mak, A. (2013). PPS: werkt dat nog? Retrieved from http://www.gebiedsontwikkeling.nu/artikel/2894-pps-werkt-dat-nog
   Google Scholar
• Mastop, H. J. M. (2000). The performance principle in strategic spatial planning. In W. Salet & A. Faludi (Eds.), The revival of strategic spatial planning (pp. 143–155). Amsterdam: KNAW.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. (2011). De Reiswijzer Gebiedsontwikkeling 2011 (Report on area development in the Netherlands). The Hague : Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, H. (1998). Land conversion at the urban fringe: A comparative study of Japan, Britain and The Netherlands. Urban Studies, 35, 1541–1558. doi:10.1080/0042098984277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2013). Opening up the compendium: An evaluation of international comparative planning research methodologies. European Planning Studies, 21(10), 1542–1561. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederlandsch Instituut voor Volkshuisvesting en Stedebouw. (1930). De Woningwet 1902-1929. Amsterdam: N.V. Van Munster’s Drukkerijen.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B. (1997). Land policy in The Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 88(3), 291–296. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.1997.tb01606.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2003). Do plans and zoning matter? Planning, 69, 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, P. C., & Ponzini, D. (2010). Spatial planning and urban development: Critical perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• PBL. (2011). Nederland in 2040: een land van regio's – Ruimtelijke Verkenning 2011 [Report on spatial planning policies in the future]. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Platform31. (2012). Ruimte voor initiatief. The Hague: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., Getimis, P., & Blotevogel, H. (Eds.). (2014). Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe. A comparative perspective on continuity and changes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B. (2005). Comparative planning cultures. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and Institutional change: A dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 2, 222–247. doi:10.5465/AMR.2002.6588004
   Google Scholar
• Siegan, B. H. (1970). Non-zoning in Houston. The Journal of Law and Economics, 13, 71–147. doi:10.1086/466684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M., & Siemiatycki, E. (2016). The role of the scholar in times of crisis. European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1168783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Nadin, V. (2009). Planning cultures between models of societies and planning systems. In J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds.), Planning cultures in Europe: Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning (pp. 283–300). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2005). New Urbanism and American planning: The conflict of cultures. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Z. (2013). Rethinking planning culture: A new institutionalist approach. Town Planning Review, 84, 683–702. doi:10.3828/tpr.2013.36
   Google Scholar
• Tennekes, J., Harbers, A., & Buitelaar, E. (2015). The institutional origins of morphological differences betweenthe Netherlands, Flanders and North Rhine-Westphalia. European Planning Studies, 23, 2165–2183. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1018437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urhahn Urban Design. (2010). The spontaneous city. Amsterdam: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Krabben, E., & Jacobs, H. M. (2013). Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience. Land Use Policy, 30, 774–783. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–21. doi:10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolting, B. (2012). PPS en gebiedsontwikkeling. The Hague: Sdu.
   Google Scholar
• van der Wouden, R. (Ed.). (2015). De ruimtelijke metamorfose van Nederland 1988–2015. Rotterdam: 010Nai.
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W., & Evers, D. (2014). Dutch national spatial planning at the end of an era. In M. Reimer, P. Getimis, & H. Blotevogel (Eds.), Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe. A comparative perspective on continuity and changes (pp. 61–82). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar