Advanced search
Publication Cover
Argumentation and Advocacy Volume 27, 1991 - Issue 3: Presidential Debating Beyond the Debate Analogy
Submit an article Journal homepage
16
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Effects of Presidential Debate Formats on Clash: A Comparative Analysis

Diana Prentice Carlin Diana Prentice Carlin is Assistant Professor and Charles Howard a graduate student in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of Kansas, LawrenceKS66045. Susan Stanfield is an Instructor and Director of Debate in the Department of Speech and Theater at Kansas State University, ManhattanKS66506. Larry Reynolds is an Instructor and Director of Debate at Kilgore Community College, KilgoreTX75662.
,
Charles Howard Diana Prentice Carlin is Assistant Professor and Charles Howard a graduate student in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of Kansas, LawrenceKS66045. Susan Stanfield is an Instructor and Director of Debate in the Department of Speech and Theater at Kansas State University, ManhattanKS66506. Larry Reynolds is an Instructor and Director of Debate at Kilgore Community College, KilgoreTX75662.
,
Susan Stanfield Diana Prentice Carlin is Assistant Professor and Charles Howard a graduate student in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of Kansas, LawrenceKS66045. Susan Stanfield is an Instructor and Director of Debate in the Department of Speech and Theater at Kansas State University, ManhattanKS66506. Larry Reynolds is an Instructor and Director of Debate at Kilgore Community College, KilgoreTX75662.
&
Larry Reynolds Diana Prentice Carlin is Assistant Professor and Charles Howard a graduate student in the Department of Communication Studies at the University of Kansas, LawrenceKS66045. Susan Stanfield is an Instructor and Director of Debate in the Department of Speech and Theater at Kansas State University, ManhattanKS66506. Larry Reynolds is an Instructor and Director of Debate at Kilgore Community College, KilgoreTX75662.
Pages 126-136 | Published online: 18 Dec 2017

Citations (10)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (4)

Josh C. Bramlett. (2021) Examining the normative and persuasive effects of televised U.S. Senate debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 57:1, pages 37-56.
Read now
William L. Benoit & LeAnn M. Brazeal. (2002) A Functional Analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis Presidential Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 38:4, pages 219-233.
Read now
Mary-Ann Leon. (1993) Revealing Character and Addressing Voters' Needs in the 1992 Presidential Debates: A Content Analysis. Argumentation and Advocacy 30:2, pages 88-105.
Read now
JohnT. Morello. (1992) The “look” and language of clash: Visual structuring of argument in the 1988 Bush‐Dukakis debates. Southern Communication Journal 57:3, pages 205-218.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (6)

Ronald Rosendal Jacobsen. (2019) Interruptions and co-construction in the First 2016 Trump–Clinton US presidential debate. Journal of Pragmatics 148, pages 71-87.
Crossref
Jürgen Maier & Carolin Jansen. (2015) When do candidates attack in election campaigns? Exploring the determinants of negative candidate messages in German televised debates. Party Politics 23:5, pages 549-559.
Crossref
Eric MorrisJessica M. Johnson. (2011) Strategic Maneuvering in the 2008 Presidential Debates. American Behavioral Scientist 55:3, pages 284-306.
Crossref
Marya L. Doerfel & Stacey L. Connaughton. (2008) Semantic networks and competition: Election year winners and losers in U.S. televised presidential debates, 1960–2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60:1, pages 201-218.
Crossref
DIANA B. CARLIN, ERIC MORRIS & SHAWNA SMITH. (2016) The Influence of Format and Questions on Candidates' Strategic Argument Choices in the 2000 Presidential Debates. American Behavioral Scientist 44:12, pages 2196-2218.
Crossref
RODERICK P. HART & SHARON E. JARVIS. (2016) Political Debate. American Behavioral Scientist 40:8, pages 1095-1122.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.