The Effects of Presidential Debate Formats on Clash: A Comparative Analysis

References

• Auer, J. J. (1962). The counterfeit debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 142–150). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, L. , & Reuter, T. (1980). Carter v. Ford: The counterfeit debates of 1976 . Madison: The Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bush and Dukakis , face to face on key issues. (1988, Oct. 1). Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report , pp. 2743–2753.
   Google Scholar
• Bush and Dukakis : Few sparks in final clash. (1988, Oct. 15). Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report , pp. 3005–3015.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D.P. (1989). A defense of the “debate” in presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 25, 208–213.
   Google Scholar
• Cater, D. (1980, November 4). Semi-requiem for semi-debates. Washington Post , sec. A, p. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, J.H. (1965). Rationality and campaigning: A content analysis of the 1960 presidential campaign debates. Western Political (Quarterly , 18, 794–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frana, A. (1989). Characteristics of effective argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy , 25, 200–202.
   Google Scholar
• Germond, J. W. , & Witcover, J. (1989). Whose broad stripes and bright stars?: The trivial pursuit of the presidency 1988 . New York: Warner Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, W. (1988, September 25). Why debates fizzle instead of sizzle. New York Times , sec. 2, p. 31.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, M. (1988, October 3). Throw away the scripts. Newsweek , p. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Hellweg, S. A. , & Phillips, S. L. (1981). Form and substance: A comparative analysis of five formats used in the 1980 presidential debates. Speaker and Gavel , 18, 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, D. (1988, September 23). The debates: Dead on arrival. New York Times , p. 27.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. M. (1989). Media nihilism and the presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 25, 220–225.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. (1969). Content Analysis for the social sciences and humanities . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. , & Birdsell, D. (1988). Presidential debates . New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karayn, J. (1979). The case for permanent presidential debates. In A. Ranney (Ed.), The past and future of presidential debates (pp. 155–174). Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. (1964). Presidential debates in 1964. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 50, 19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lectern to lectern . (1988, November 21). Newsweek , p. 123.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, C. (1984, October 28). The art of vagueness. Washington Post , sec. K, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• McClain, T. B. (1989). Secondary school debate pedagogy. Argumentation and Advocacy , 25, 203–204.
   Google Scholar
• Meadow, R. G. , & Jackson-Beeck, M. (1978). A comparative perspective on presidential debates: Issue evolution in 1960 and 1976. In G. F. Bishop , R. G. Meadow , & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 33–58). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Morello, J. T. (1988). Argument and visual structuring in the 1984 Mondale-Reagan debates: The medium's influence on the perception of clash. Western Journal of Speech Communication , 52, 277–290.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1981, November). Political debate formats: The next step. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1983). Criteria and format to optimize political debates: An analysis of South Dakota's “election 1980” series. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 19, 205–214.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. B. , Larsen, J. K. , & Sobnosky, M.J. (1981, November). The Carter-Reagan debate: A comparison of clash in the dual format. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, P. , & Hollihan, T. (1981). The 1980 presidential debate: A content analysis of the issues and arguments. Speaker and Gavel , 18, 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, P. , Hollihan, T. , & Cooley, D. (1980, April). The 1976 presidential debate: An analysis of the issues and arguments. Paper presented at the meeting of the Central States Speech Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, R. (1976, October 9). Two for the show. New Republic , p. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. M. (1960, November 11). The debates in retrospect. New Republic , pp. 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, L. L. , & Swanson, D. L. (1978). The agenda-setting function of the Ford-Carter debate. Communication Monographs , 45, 347–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiemens, R. K. , Hellweg, S. A. , Kipper, P. , & Phillips, S. L. (1985). An integrative verbal and visual analysis of the Reagan-Carter debate. Communication Quarterly , 33, 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Trent, J. S. , & Friedenberg, R. V. (1983). Political campaign communication: Principles and practices . New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, M. (1989). The 1988 electoral debates and debate theory. Argumentation and Advocacy , 25, 214–219.
   Google Scholar