Citations (22)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (20)
Steven Jay Lynn, Reed Maxwell & Joseph P. Green. (2017) The Hypnotic Induction in the Broad Scheme of Hypnosis: A Sociocognitive Perspective. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 59:4, pages 363-384.
Read now
Read now
Stephen Lankton. (2016) Conscious/Unconscious Dissociation Induction: Increasing Hypnotic Performance With “Resistant” Clients. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 59:2, pages 175-185.
Read now
Read now
ErnestL. Rossi & KathrynL. Rossi. (2007) What is a Suggestion? The Neuroscience of Implicit Processing Heuristics in Therapeutic Hypnosis and Psychotherapy. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 49:4, pages 267-281.
Read now
Read now
MICHAEL R. NASH. (2005) The Importance of Being Earnest When Crafting Definitions: Science and Scientism Are not the Same Thing
. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 53:3, pages 265-280.
Read now
Read now
BetseyR. Robin, V. K. Kumar & RonaldJ. Pekala. (2005) Direct and Indirect Scales of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Resistance to Therapy and Psychometric Comparability Abstract. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 53:2, pages 135-147.
Read now
Read now
Joseph Barber. (2000) Where ericksonian legend meets scientific method: A comment on matthews. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 48:4, pages 427-432.
Read now
Read now
WilliamJ. Matthews. (2000) Ericksonian approaches to hypnosis and therapy: Where are we now?. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 48:4, pages 418-426.
Read now
Read now
Gary Groth-marnat & Kaye Mitchell. (1998) Responsiveness to direct versus indirect hypnotic procedures: The role of resistance as a predictor variable. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 46:4, pages 324-333.
Read now
Read now
Mike Dixon, Louise Labelle & Jean-Roch Laurence. (1996) A multivariate approach to the prediction of hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 44:3, pages 250-264.
Read now
Read now
WilliamJ. Matthews & GailL. Isenberg. (1995) A comparison of the hypnotic experience between signing deaf and hearing participants. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 43:4, pages 375-385.
Read now
Read now
JohnF. Chaves. (1994) Recent Advances in the Application of Hypnosis to Pain Management. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 37:2, pages 117-129.
Read now
Read now
Csaba Szabó. (1993) The Phenomenology of the Experiences and the Depth of Hypnosis: Comparison of Direct and Indirect Induction Techniques. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 41:3, pages 225-233.
Read now
Read now
Steven
Jay Lynn, Victor Neufeld & Cornelia Maré. (1993) Direct Versus Indirect Suggestions: A Conceptual and Methodological Review. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 41:2, pages 124-152.
Read now
Read now
WilliamJ. Matthews & GailL. Isenberg. (1992) Hypnotic Inductions with Deaf and Hearing Subjects – an Initial Comparison. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 40:1, pages 7-11.
Read now
Read now
GailL. Isenberg & WilliamJ. Matthews. (1991) Working Hypnotically with Deaf People. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 34:2, pages 91-99.
Read now
Read now
WilliamJ. Matthews & Sarah Langdell. (1989) What Do Clients Think about the Metaphors They Receive? An Initial Inquiry. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 31:4, pages 242-251.
Read now
Read now
A.
Jan Willem Van Der Does, Richard
Van Dyck, Philip Spinhoven & Annemarie Kloosman. (1989) The effectiveness of standardized versus individualized hypnotic suggestions: A brief communication
. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 37:1, pages 1-5.
Read now
Read now
Gordon Cochrane. (1989) The Use of Indirect Hypnotic Suggestions for Insomnia Arising from Generalized Anxiety: A Case Report. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 31:3, pages 199-203.
Read now
Read now
Philip Spinhoven, Diana Baak, Richard
Van Dyck & Peter Vermeulen. (1988) The effectiveness of an authoritative versus permissive style of hypnotic communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 36:3, pages 182-191.
Read now
Read now
LaurenceJ. Kirmayer. (1988) Word magic and the rhetoric of common sense: Erickson's metaphors for mind. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 36:3, pages 157-172.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (2)
Anoushiravan Zahedi & Werner Sommer. (2022) Can hypnotic susceptibility be explained by bifactor models? Structural equation modeling of the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility – Form A. Consciousness and Cognition 99, pages 103289.
Crossref
Crossref
Joseph Deltito & Lee Baer. (2016) Hypnosis in the Treatment of Depression: Research and Theory. Psychological Reports 58:3, pages 923-929.
Crossref
Crossref