871
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research paper

Analysis of students’ arguments on evolutionary theory

, &
Pages 192-199 | Published online: 24 May 2013

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (6)

Hayden Godfrey & Sibel Erduran. (2023) Argumentation and intellectual humility: a theoretical synthesis and an empirical study about students’ warrants. Research in Science & Technological Education 41:4, pages 1350-1371.
Read now
Liam Guilfoyle & Sibel Erduran. (2021) Recalibrating the evolution versus creationism debate for student learning: towards students’ evaluation of evidence in an argumentation task. International Journal of Science Education 43:18, pages 2974-2995.
Read now
Jessica Chan, Nigel Fancourt & Liam Guilfoyle. (2021) Argumentation in religious education in England: an analysis of locally agreed syllabuses. British Journal of Religious Education 43:4, pages 458-471.
Read now
Liam Guilfoyle, Sibel Erduran & Wonyong Park. (2021) An investigation into secondary teachers’ views of argumentation in science and religious education. Journal of Beliefs & Values 42:2, pages 190-204.
Read now
Charlotte Neubrand & Ute Harms. (2017) Tackling the difficulties in learning evolution: effects of adaptive self-explanation prompts. Journal of Biological Education 51:4, pages 336-348.
Read now
Nicolai Basel, Ute Harms, Helmut Prechtl, Thomas Weiß & Martin Rothgangel. (2014) Students’ arguments on the science and religion issue: the example of evolutionary theory and Genesis. Journal of Biological Education 48:4, pages 179-187.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (12)

Ntinolazou Christina & Papadopoulou Penelope. (2024) The teaching of evolutionary theory and the Cosmos–Evidence–Ideas model. Evolution: Education and Outreach 17:1.
Crossref
Kaela Clabaugh Howell & Emily A. Holt. (2023) Student reasonings and cognitive biases in climate change predictions. Science Education 108:1, pages 86-106.
Crossref
Jessica Chan & Sibel Erduran. (2022) The Impact of Collaboration Between Science and Religious Education Teachers on Their Understanding and Views of Argumentation. Research in Science Education 53:1, pages 121-137.
Crossref
Sibel Erduran, Liam Guilfoyle & Wonyong Park. (2020) Science and Religious Education Teachers’ Views of Argumentation and Its Teaching. Research in Science Education 52:2, pages 655-673.
Crossref
Nigel Fancourt & Liam Guilfoyle. (2021) Interdisciplinary perspective-taking within argumentation: students’ strategies across science and religious education. Journal of Religious Education 70:1, pages 1-23.
Crossref
Julian Fischer, Thorben Jansen, Jens Möller & Ute Harms. (2021) Measuring biology trainee teachers’ professional knowledge about evolution—introducing the Student Inventory. Evolution: Education and Outreach 14:1.
Crossref
Sibel Erduran, Liam Guilfoyle, Wonyong Park, Jessica Chan & Nigel Fancourt. (2019) Argumentation and interdisciplinarity: reflections from the Oxford Argumentation in Religion and Science Project. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 1:1.
Crossref
Helge Gresch & Julia Schwanewedel. 2019. Biologiedidaktische Forschung: Erträge für die Praxis. Biologiedidaktische Forschung: Erträge für die Praxis 167 185 .
Lena A. E. Tibell & Ute Harms. (2017) Biological Principles and Threshold Concepts for Understanding Natural Selection. Science & Education 26:7-9, pages 953-973.
Crossref
Ralph M. Barnes, Rebecca A. Church & Samuel Draznin-Nagy. (2017) The Nature of the Arguments for Creationism, Intelligent Design, and Evolution. Science & Education 26:1-2, pages 27-47.
Crossref
Y Darmawanti, P Siahaan & A Widodo. (2017) The Effect of Generate Argument’ Instruction Model to Increase Reasoning Ability of Seventh Grade Students on Interactions of Living Thing with their Environment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 812, pages 012042.
Crossref
Elizabeth Watts, Georgy S. Levit & Uwe Hoßfeld. (2016) Science standards: The foundation of evolution education in the United States. Perspectives in Science 10, pages 59-65.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.