Analysis of students’ arguments on evolutionary theory

References

• Asterhan, C. S. C., and B. B. Schwarz. 2007. “The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99(3): 626–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S. C., and B. B. Schwarz. 2009. “Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Indications From Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialog.” Cognitive Science 33(3): 374–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baalmann, W., H. Weitzel, V. Frerichs, H. Gropengießer, and U. Kattmann. 2004. “Schülervorstellungen zu Prozessen der Anpassung - Ergebnisse einer Interviewstudie im Rahmen der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion. “[Students’ conceptions on processes of adaptation – Results of an interview study within the context of the Didactical Reconstruction]”.” ZfDN 10: 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., and K. L. McNeill. 2010. “A Learning Progression for Scientific Argumentation: Understanding Student Work and Designing Supportive Instructional Contexts.” Science Education 94(5): 765–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blancke, S., M. Boudry, J. Braeckman, J. De Smedt, and H. De Cruz. 2011. “Dealing With Creationist Challenges. What European Biology Teachers Might Expect in the Classroom.” Journal of Biological Education 45(4): 176–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricker, L. A., and P. Bell. 2008. “Conceptualizations of Argumentation From Science Studies and the Learning Sciences and Their Implications for the Practices of Science Education.” Science Education 92(3): 473–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, D. B., and V. Sampson. 2008. “Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45(3): 293–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms.” Science Education 84(3): 287–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. 2007. “Quality Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria.” In Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives From Classroom-based Research”, edited by S. Erduran and M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre, 159–175. Dordecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., S. Simon, and J. Osborne. 2004. “TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse.” Science Education 88(6): 915–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, C. 2012. “Creationism as a Misconception: Socio-cognitive Conflict in the Teaching of Evolution.” International Journal of Science Education 34(14): 2171–2180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., A. B. Rodriguez, and R. A. Duschl. 2000. “’Doing the Lesson’” or ‘Doing Science’: Arguments in High School Genetics.” Science Education 84(6): 757–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K., and V. Zogza. 2008. “Students’ Intuitive Explanations of the Causes of Homologies and Adaptations.” Science and Education 17(1): 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K., and V. Zogza. 2009. ““Preliminary Evolutionary Explanations: A Basic Framework for Conceptual Change and Explanatory Coherence in Evolution.” Science and Education 18(10): 1313–1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., and A. Takao. 2002. “Epistemic Levels in Argument: An Analysis of University Oceanography Students’ Use of Evidence in Writing.” Science Education 86(3): 314–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienpointner, M. 1992. Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern [Everyday Logic: The structure and function of argumentation schemes]. Stuttgart - Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1991. The Skills of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2010. “Teaching and Learning Science as Argument.” Science Education 94(5): 810–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2000. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (2). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2386.
   Google Scholar
• Nehm, R. H., and L. Reilly. 2007. “Biology Majors’ Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection.” Bioscience 57(3): 263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M. 2011. “Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education.” Educational Psychologist 46(2): 84–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2010. “Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse.” Science 328: 463–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Erduran, and S. Simon. 2004. “Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41(10): 994–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., and A. Patterson. 2011. “Scientific Argument and Explanation: A Necessary Distinction?” Science Education 95(4): 627–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2005. “Evolutionary Theory as a Guide to Socioscientific Decision-making.” Journal of Biological Education 39(2): 68–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U. 2010. “Current Status of Research in Teaching and Learning Evolution: II. Pedagogical Issues.” Science and Education 19(6–8): 539–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, M. D., M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre, and E. F. Mortimer. 2010. “Articulation of Conceptual Knowledge and Argumentation Practices by High School Students in Evolution Problems.” Science and Education 19(6–8): 573–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• v. Aufschnaiter, C., J. Fleischhauer, C. Rogge, and T. Riemeier. 2008. “Argumentation and Scientific Reasoning – An Exploration of Their Interrelationship.” Paper presented at the conference of NARST, Baltimore, USA, March 30th -April 2nd.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. 2006. Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar