Judith Maria Schmid, Joaquin Marc Veith, My Hanh Truong, Michael Straulino, Bianca Winkler, Fabian Hennig & Philipp Bitzenbauer. (2023) Nanoscience and -technology in secondary education: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 19:12, pages em2361.
Crossref
Konstantinos Kalovrektis, Ioannis Dimos, Apostolos Xanakis & Athanasios Kakarountas. (2023) Nanotechnology as a Tool for Computational Thinking Skills using Open Hardware, Embedded Systems and Repository Platform, in Industry 4.0 Era. Nanotechnology as a Tool for Computational Thinking Skills using Open Hardware, Embedded Systems and Repository Platform, in Industry 4.0 Era.
Erdal ŞENOCAK & İbrahim ARPACI. (2023) A Bibliometric Analysis on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Education ResearchNanobilim ve Nanoteknoloji Eğitimi Araştırmaları Üzerine Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz. Turkiye Kimya Dernegi Dergisi Kısım C: Kimya Egitimi 8:1, pages 1-30.
Crossref
Leonidas Manou, Anna Spyrtou, Euripides Hatzikraniotis & Petros Kariotoglou. (2021) What does “Nanoscience –Nanotechnology” mean to primary school teachers?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 20:6, pages 1269-1290.
Crossref
Riam Abu Much, Kurt Winkelmann & Muhamad Hugerat. 2022. Nanochemistry for Chemistry Educators. Nanochemistry for Chemistry Educators
36
43
.
Tamer YILDIRIM. (2021) Nanoteknoloji Öğretimi Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmaların Uluslararası Literatür Kapsamında Tematik İncelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi:52, pages 77-96.
Crossref
Anna Spyrtou, Leonidas Manou & Giorgos Peikos. (2021) Educational Significance of Nanoscience–Nanotechnology: Primary School Teachers’ and Students’ Voices after a Training Program. Education Sciences 11:11, pages 724.
Crossref
Şeyma ÇALIK, Ayşe KOÇ, Tuba ŞENEL, Erhan ZOR & Oktay ASLAN. (2021) Nanobilim ve Nanoteknolojinin TÜBİTAK Popüler Bilim Dergilerine YansımalarıReflections of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in TUBITAK Popular Science Magazines. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 2021:17, pages 90-113.
Crossref
Achilleas Mandrikas, Emily Michailidi & Dimitris Stavrou. (2021) In-service Teachers’ Needs and Mentor’s Practices in Applying a Teaching–Learning Sequence on Nanotechnology and Plastics in Primary Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 30:5, pages 630-641.
Crossref
Şeref TAN, Zeki IPEK, Ali Derya ATİK & Figen ERKOÇ. (2021) Examining the Invariance of a Measurement Model of Teachers’ Awareness and Exposure Levels to Nanoscience by Using the Covariance Structure ApproachExamining the Invariance of a Measurement Model of Teachers’ Awareness and Exposure Levels to Nanoscience by Using the Covariance Structure Approach. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 8:3, pages 487-508.
Crossref
Jurica Bauer. (2021) Teaching Nanotechnology through Research Proposals. Journal of Chemical Education 98:7, pages 2347-2355.
Crossref
Latifah Abdullah Alshabanah, Mohamed Hagar, Laila A. Al-Mutabagani, Ghada M. Abozaid, Salwa M. Abdallah, Nader Shehata, Hoda Ahmed & Ahmed H. Hassanin. (2021) Hybrid Nanofibrous Membranes as a Promising Functional Layer for Personal Protection Equipment: Manufacturing and Antiviral/Antibacterial Assessments. Polymers 13:11, pages 1776.
Crossref
Athanasios Velentzas & Dimitris Stavrou. (2021) Exploring fullerenes and nanotubes in the classroom. Chemistry Teacher International 3:1, pages 45-55.
Crossref
Ria Dolfing, Gjalt T. Prins, Astrid M. W. Bulte, Albert Pilot & Jan D. Vermunt. (2020) Strategies to support teachers' professional development regarding sense‐making in context‐based science curricula. Science Education 105:1, pages 127-165.
Crossref
Zeki IPEK, Ali Derya ATİK, Şeref TAN & Figen ERKOÇ. (2020) Study of The Validity and Reliability of Nanotechnology Awareness Scale in Turkish CultureStudy of The Validity and Reliability of Nanotechnology Awareness Scale in Turkish Culture. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 7:4, pages 674-689.
Crossref
Wichai Lati, Darapond Triampo & Supan Yodyingyong. (2019) Exposure to Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Using Guided-Inquiry-Based Activities with Silica Aerogel To Promote High School Students’ Motivation. Journal of Chemical Education 96:6, pages 1109-1116.
Crossref
Marleny Leasa, John Rafafy Batlolona & Melvie Talakua. Analysis of internal representations about the concept of science in elementary school. Analysis of internal representations about the concept of science in elementary school.
Giannis Sgouros & Dimitris Stavrou. 2019. Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education. Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education
339
356
.
Leonidas Manou, Anna Spyrtou, Euripides Hatzikraniotis & Petros Kariotoglou. (2018) Content transformation for experimental teaching nanoscale science and engineering to primary teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1076, pages 012006.
Crossref
Tuba Şenel Zor & Oktay Aslan. (2018) The effect of activity-based nanoscience and nanotechnology education on pre-service science teachers’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 20:3.
Crossref
Brady Michael Jack, Ling Lee, Kuay-Keng Yang & Huann-shyang Lin. (2016) A Science for Citizenship Model: Assessing the Effects of Benefits, Risks, and Trust for Predicting Students’ Interest in and Understanding of Science-Related Content. Research in Science Education 47:5, pages 965-988.
Crossref
Seyda Gul. (2017) Development of an Attitude Scale to Measure the Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes Towards Nanobiotechnology. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26:5, pages 519-533.
Crossref
Trust Saidi & Esther Sigauke. (2017) The use of Museum Based Science Centres to Expose Primary School Students in Developing Countries to Abstract and Complex Concepts of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26:5, pages 470-480.
Crossref
Yi Kong, Kerrie A. Douglas, Kelsey J. Rodgers, Heidi Diefes‐Dux & Krishna Madhavan. (2017) A Size and Scale Framework for Guiding Curriculum Design and Assessment. Journal of Engineering Education 106:3, pages 431-453.
Crossref
Kurt Winkelmann & Bharat Bhushan. 2017. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology
1603
1624
.
Yanli Wang, Chenchen Li & Chunying Chen. 2016. Toxicology of Nanomaterials. Toxicology of Nanomaterials
231
256
.
Gizem Enil & Yüksel Köseoğlu. (2016) Investigation of nanotechnology awareness, interests and attitudes of pre-service Science (Physics, Chemistry and Biology) teachers. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research 2:1, pages 50-63.
Crossref
Konrad J. Schönborn, Gunnar E. Höst, Karljohan E. Lundin Palmerius & Jennifer Flint. 2016. Web Design and Development. Web Design and Development
519
536
.
Konrad J. Schönborn, Gunnar E. Höst & Karljohan E. Lundin Palmerius. 2016. Global Perspectives of Nanoscience and Engineering Education. Global Perspectives of Nanoscience and Engineering Education
195
222
.
Sylvie Retailleau, Claire Dupas-Haeberlin, Jean-Michel Lourtioz & Arnaud Bournel. 2016. Nanosciences and Nanotechnology. Nanosciences and Nanotechnology
325
338
.
Chi-Feng Lee, Pei-Yun You, Ying-Chiao Lin, Tsai-Ling Hsu, Pi-Yun Cheng, Yu-Xuan Wu, Chi-Shun Tseng, Sheng-Wen Chen, Huey-Por Chang & Yang-Wei Lin. (2015) Exploring the Stability of Gold Nanoparticles by Experimenting with Adsorption Interactions of Nanomaterials in an Undergraduate Lab. Journal of Chemical Education 92:6, pages 1066-1070.
Crossref
Lynn A. Bryan, Alejandra J. Magana & David Sederberg. (2015) Published research on pre-college students’ and teachers’ nanoscale science, engineering, and technology learning. Nanotechnology Reviews 4:1.
Crossref
Shu-Fen Lin, Jun-Yi Chen, Kun-Yi Shih, Kuo-Hua Wang & Huey-Por Chang. (2015) Science teachers’ perceptions of nanotechnology teaching and professional development: a survey study in Taiwan. Nanotechnology Reviews 4:1.
Crossref
Konrad J. Schönborn, Gunnar E. Höst, Karljohan E. Lundin Palmerius & Jennifer Flint. (2014) Development of an Interactive Immersion Environment for Engendering Understanding about Nanotechnology. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments 5:2, pages 40-56.
Crossref
Erdal Senocak. (2014) A Survey on Nanotechnology in the View of the Turkish Public. Science, Technology and Society 19:1, pages 79-94.
Crossref
Ron Blonder, Ilka Parchmann, Sevil Akaygun & Virginie Albe. 2014. Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Topics and Trends in Current Science Education
159
174
.
Nurettin Sahin & Emel Ekli. (2013) Nanotechnology awareness, opinions and risk perceptions among middle school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 23:4, pages 867-881.
Crossref
Guillaume Millet, Anatole Lécuyer, Jean-Marie Burkhardt, Sinan Haliyo & Stéphane Régnier. (2013) Haptics and graphic analogies for the understanding of atomic force microscopy. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71:5, pages 608-626.
Crossref
Gunnar E. Höst, Konrad J. Schönborn & Karljohan E. Lundin Palmerius. (2013) A Case-Based Study of Students' Visuohaptic Experiences of Electric Fields around Molecules: Shaping the Development of Virtual Nanoscience Learning Environments. Education Research International 2013, pages 1-11.
Crossref
R. Tolley, A. Silvidi, C. Little & K. F. Eid. (2013) Conductance quantization: A laboratory experiment in a senior-level nanoscale science and technology course. American Journal of Physics 81:1, pages 14-19.
Crossref
Heo-Jeong Yoon, Won-Jeong Yoon & Ae-Ja Woo. (2012) Investigation of Prospective High School Students' and Science Teachers' Views on 'Advanced Material'. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 32:2, pages 279-292.
Crossref
Karljohan Lundin Palmerius, Gunnar Höst & Konrad Schönborn. 2012. Haptic and Audio Interaction Design. Haptic and Audio Interaction Design
81
90
.