620
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Local perceptions of grassland degradation in China: a socio-anthropological reading of endogenous knowledge and institutional credibility

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (4)

Linda Yueh. (2021) The China paradox: the endogenous relationship between law and economic growth. Journal of Chinese Governance 6:2, pages 257-282.
Read now
Peter Ho. (2016) Empty institutions, non-credibility and pastoralism: China’s grazing ban, mining and ethnicity. The Journal of Peasant Studies 43:6, pages 1145-1176.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (14)

Lihua Yang, Qi Ma & Hongfu Liu. (2022) Reasons and resolution approaches of environmental conflict in grassland areas: An empirical study in contemporary northern China. Journal of Environmental Management 323, pages 116291.
Crossref
Xinxin Wang & Kevin Lo. (2022) Pastoralism and conservation: The politics and notions of environmental justice under the grazing ban policy in Inner Mongolia, China. Political Geography 99, pages 102779.
Crossref
Julio Sa Rego, Paula Cabo & Marina Castro. (2022) Pastoralism, multifunctionality, and environmental agency: Insights from mountain sheep pastoralists in Northern Portugal. Journal of Agrarian Change 22:4, pages 766-786.
Crossref
Chen Qian, Gerrit Antonides, Nico Heerink, Xueqin Zhu & Xianlei Ma. (2022) An economic-psychological perspective on perceived land tenure security: Evidence from rural eastern China. Land Use Policy 120, pages 106294.
Crossref
Shengyue Fan, Miao He, Tianyu Zhang, Yajing Huo & Di Fan. (2022) Credibility measurement as a tool for conserving nature: Chinese herders’ livelihood capitals and payment for grassland ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 115, pages 106032.
Crossref
Bai Peng-Peng, Mattia Mancini, Juan Du & Ruth Mace. (2021) Matching Local Knowledge and Environmental Change with Policy Changes in Rangeland Tenure. Human Ecology 49:3, pages 341-352.
Crossref
Amineh Ghorbani, Peter Ho & Giangiacomo Bravo. (2021) Institutional form versus function in a common property context: The credibility thesis tested through an agent-based model. Land Use Policy 102, pages 105237.
Crossref
Xiuyun Yang & Peter Ho. (2020) Mining institutions, contention and credibility: Applying the Conflict Analysis Model to court cases in China. The Extractive Industries and Society 7:3, pages 1011-1021.
Crossref
Peter Ho. (2020) The credibility of (in)formality: Or, the irrelevance of institutional form in judging performance. Cities 99, pages 102609.
Crossref
Erez Tzfadia, Avinoam Meir, Batya Roded & Eli Atzmon. (2020) Gray local governance and Israeli Indigenous Bedouin: Credibility, functionality and the politics of refusal. Cities 97, pages 102484.
Crossref
Peter Ho. (2018) Reprint of “Institutional function versus form: Evolutionary credibility of land, housing and natural resources”. Land Use Policy 79, pages 845-853.
Crossref
Jiayu Wu, Yan Song, Jian Lin & Qingsong He. (2018) Tackling the uncertainty of spatial regulations in China: An institutional analysis of the “multi-plan combination”. Habitat International 78, pages 1-12.
Crossref
Peter Ho. (2018) Institutional function versus form: The evolutionary credibility of land, housing and natural resources. Land Use Policy 75, pages 642-650.
Crossref
Heng Zhao, Ying Zhao, Guiying Gao & Peter Ho. (2018) China's desertification deconstructed: towards a scientists' model based on long-term perceptions of grassland restoration (1995-2011). Restoration Ecology 26, pages S26-S36.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.