Advanced search
Publication Cover
Communication Monographs Volume 47, 1980 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
52
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Differences in perceptions created by syntactic‐semantic productions of male and female speakers

Anthony Mulac Associate professor of speech and director of the laboratory for quantitative research in speech, University of California, Santa Barbara
&
Torborg Louisa Lundell Associate professor of Swedish in the department of Germanic and Slavic languages and literature, University of California, Santa Barbara
Pages 111-118 | Published online: 02 Jun 2009

Citations (42)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (13)

BarryS. Sapolsky*DanielM. Shafer & BarbaraK. Kaye. (2010) Rating Offensive Words in Three Television Program Contexts. Mass Communication and Society 14:1, pages 45-70.
Read now
Barry S. Sapolsky & Barbara K. Kaye. (2005) The Use of Offensive Language by Men and Women in Prime Time Television Entertainment. Atlantic Journal of Communication 13:4, pages 292-303.
Read now
Vivian De Klerk. (1991) Expletives: Men only?. Communication Monographs 58:2, pages 156-169.
Read now
ChristopherJ. Zahn. (1989) Some data on the predictive validity of the speech evaluation instrument. Communication Research Reports 6:1, pages 53-58.
Read now
ChristopherJ. Zahn. (1989) The bases for differing evaluations of male and female speech: Evidence from ratings of transcribed conversation. Communication Monographs 56:1, pages 59-74.
Read now
Anthony Mulac, JohnM. Wiemann, SallyJ. Widenmann & ToniW. Gibson. (1988) Male/female language differences and effects in same‐sex and mixed‐sex dyads: The gender‐linked language effect. Communication Monographs 55:4, pages 315-335.
Read now
VirginiaP. Richmond, JoanS. Gorham & BrianJ. Furio. (1987) Affinity‐seeking communication in collegiate female‐male relationships. Communication Quarterly 35:4, pages 334-348.
Read now
Anthony Mulac, Torborg Louisa Lundell & JamesJ. Bradac. (1986) Male/female language differences and attributional consequences in a public speaking situation: Toward an explanation of the gender‐linked language effect. Communication Monographs 53:2, pages 115-129.
Read now
JamesJ. Bradac. (1986) Threats to generalization in the use of elicited, purloined, and contrived messages in human communication research. Communication Quarterly 34:1, pages 55-65.
Read now
JamesJ. Bradac & Anthony Mulac. (1984) A molecular view of powerful and powerless speech styles: Attributional consequences of specific language features and communicator intentions. Communication Monographs 51:4, pages 307-319.
Read now
DominicA. Infante. (1983) Motivation to speak on a controversial topic: Value expectancy, sex differences, and implications. Central States Speech Journal 34:2, pages 96-103.
Read now
FernL. Johnson & Richard Buttny. (1982) White listeners’ responses to “sounding black” and “sounding white”: The effects of message content on judgments about language . Communication Monographs 49:1, pages 33-49.
Read now
Jo Liska, Elizabeth Walker Mechling & Susan Stathas. (1981) Differences in subjects' perceptions of gender and believability between users of deferential and nondeferential language. Communication Quarterly 29:1, pages 40-48.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (29)

Nicholas A. PalomaresEun-Ju Lee. (2009) Virtual Gender Identity: The Linguistic Assimilation to Gendered Avatars in Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29:1, pages 5-23.
Crossref
Eun-Ju Lee. (2007) Effects of Gendered Language on Gender Stereotyping in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Moderating Role of Depersonalization and Gender-Role Orientation. Human Communication Research 33:4, pages 515-535.
Crossref
Andrzej Huczynski. 2004. Influencing Within Organizations. Influencing Within Organizations.
Richard L StreetJr.Jr.. (2002) Gender differences in health care provider–patient communication: are they due to style, stereotypes, or accommodation?. Patient Education and Counseling 48:3, pages 201-206.
Crossref
A Mulac, JJ Bradac & P Gibbons. (2006) Empirical support for the gender-as-culture hypothesis.. Human Communication Research 27:1, pages 121-152.
Crossref
J.S. Hyde. 2001. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 5989 5994 .
Anthony Mulac, David R. Seibold & Jennifer Lee Farris. (2016) Female and Male Managers’ and Professionals’ Criticism Giving. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 19:4, pages 389-415.
Crossref
Anthony Mulac. 1999. Wahrnehmung und Herstellung von Geschlecht. Wahrnehmung und Herstellung von Geschlecht 88 104 .
Richard H. Haswell & Janis Tedesco Haswell. (1996) Gender bias and critique of student writing. Assessing Writing 3:1, pages 31-83.
Crossref
Mary Anne Fitzpatrick, Anthony Mulac & Kathryn Dindia. (2016) Gender-Preferential Language Use in Spouse and Stranger Interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14:1-2, pages 18-39.
Crossref
Anthony Mulac & Torborg Louisa Lundell. (1994) Effects of gender-linked language differences in adults' written discourse: Multivariate tests of language effects. Language & Communication 14:3, pages 299-309.
Crossref
Kathryn Greene & Donald L. Rubin. (2016) Effects of Gender Inclusive/Exclusive Language in Religious Discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 10:2, pages 81-98.
Crossref
Charles R. McMahan. (1991) Evaluation and reinforcement: What do males and females really want to hear?. Sex Roles 24:11-12, pages 771-783.
Crossref
Anthony Mulac, Lisa B. Studley & Sheridan Blau. (1990) The gender-linked language effect in primary and secondary students' impromptu essays. Sex Roles 23:9-10, pages 439-470.
Crossref
Samuel G. Lawrence & Robert Hopper. (2016) The Effects of Sex Dialects and Sex Stereotypes on Speech Evaluations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9:3, pages 209-224.
Crossref
Elizabeth Tebeaux. (2016) Toward an Understanding of Gender Differences in Written Business Communications: A Suggested Perspective for Future Research. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 4:1, pages 25-43.
Crossref
Anthony Mulac. (2016) Men's and Women's Talk in Same-Gender and Mixed-Gender Dyads: Power or Polemic?'. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 8:3-4, pages 249-270.
Crossref
ANTHONY MULAC, LISA B. STUDLEY, JOHN M. WIEMANN & JAMES J. BRADAC. (1987) Male/Female Gaze in Same-Sex and Mixed-Sex Dyads Gender-Linked Differences and Mutual Influence. Human Communication Research 13:3, pages 323-343.
Crossref
Anthony Mulac & Torborg Louisa Lundell. (2016) Linguistic Contributors to the Gender-Linked Language Effect. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 5:2, pages 81-101.
Crossref
Christopher J. Zahn & Robert Hopper. (2016) Measuring Language Attitudes: The Speech Evaluation Instrument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 4:2, pages 113-123.
Crossref
ANTHONY MULAC, JAMES J. BRADAC & SUSAN KAROL MANN. (1985) MALE/FEMALE LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES AND ATTRIBUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES IN CHILDREN'S TELEVISION. Human Communication Research 11:4, pages 481-506.
Crossref
Nancy M. Henley & Sean Harmon. 1985. Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior. Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior 151 164 .
James J. Bradac & Randall Wisegarver. (2016) Ascribed Status, Lexical Diversity, and Accent: Determinants of Perceived Status, Solidarity, and Control of Speech Style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3:4, pages 239-255.
Crossref
James J. Bradac & Anthony Mulac. (2016) Attributional Consequences of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles in a Crisis-Intervention Context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3:1, pages 1-19.
Crossref
Philip M. Smith. (2016) Social Psychology and Language: a Taxonomy and Overview. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 2:2-3-4, pages 163-182.
Crossref
Donald L. Rubin & Marie Wilson Nelson. (2016) Multiple Determinants of a Stigmatized Speech Style: Women's Language, Powerless Language, or Everyone's Language?. Language and Speech 26:3, pages 273-290.
Crossref
B. AUBREY FISHER. (1983) DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF SEXUAL COMPOSITION AND INTERACTIONAL CONTEXT ON INTERACTION PATTERNS IN DYADS. Human Communication Research 9:3, pages 225-238.
Crossref
SALLY JACKSON & SCOTT JACOBS. (1983) GENERALIZING ABOUT MESSAGES: SUGGESTIONS FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS. Human Communication Research 9:2, pages 169-191.
Crossref
Anthony Mulac & Torborg Louisa Lundell. (2016) An Empirical Test of the Gender-Linked Language Effect in a Public Speaking Setting. Language and Speech 25:3, pages 243-256.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.