Advanced search
Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 16, 2009 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
945
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System Exceeds the Cost of Giving Every Qualified Researcher a Baseline Grant

Richard Gordon Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Bryan J. Poulin Faculty of Business Administration, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Pages 13-40 | Published online: 26 Feb 2009

Citations (25)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (2)

Elise Smith. (2011) The Limits of Sharing: An Ethical Analysis of the Arguments For and Against the Sharing of Databases and Material Banks. Accountability in Research 18:6, pages 357-381.
Read now
SJOERD ROORDA. (2009) The Real Cost of the NSERC Peer Review is Less than 5% of a Proposed Baseline Grant. Accountability in Research 16:4, pages 229-231.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (23)

Laurent Gautron. (2023) Peut-on affranchir la recherche biomédicale du modèle managérial ?. médecine/sciences 39:2, pages 170-176.
Crossref
Martin Dresler. (2022) FENS‐Kavli Network of Excellence: Postponed, non‐competitive peer review for research funding. European Journal of Neuroscience.
Crossref
Cobi Calyx. (2022) Participatory budgeting for research funding decisions. Evidence & Policy 18:1, pages 163-176.
Crossref
Chris L.B. Graham, Thomas E. Landrain, Amber Vjestica, Camille Masselot, Elliot Lawton, Leo Blondel, Luca Haenal, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras & Marc Santolini. (2023) Community review: a robust and scalable selection system for resource allocation within open science and innovation communities. F1000Research 11, pages 1440.
Crossref
Chris L.B. Graham, Thomas E. Landrain, Amber Vjestica, Camille Masselot, Elliot Lawton, Leo Blondel, Luca Haenal, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras & Marc Santolini. (2022) Community review: a robust and scalable selection system for resource allocation within open science and innovation communities. F1000Research 11, pages 1440.
Crossref
Elena A. Erosheva, Patrícia Martinková & Carole J. Lee. (2021) When Zero May Not Be Zero: A Cautionary Note on the Use of Inter-Rater Reliability in Evaluating Grant Peer Review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society 184:3, pages 904-919.
Crossref
Stijn Conix, Andreas De Block & Krist Vaesen. (2021) Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices. F1000Research 10, pages 1126.
Crossref
Stijn Conix, Andreas De Block & Krist Vaesen. (2021) Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices. F1000Research 10, pages 1126.
Crossref
Ben Morgan, Ly-Mee Yu, Tom Solomon & Sue Ziebland. (2020) Assessing health research grant applications: A retrospective comparative review of a one-stage versus a two-stage application assessment process. PLOS ONE 15:3, pages e0230118.
Crossref
Kaare Aagaard, Alexander Kladakis & Mathias W. Nielsen. (2020) Concentration or dispersal of research funding?. Quantitative Science Studies 1:1, pages 117-149.
Crossref
Lloyd D. Balbuena. (2018) The UK Research Excellence Framework and the Matthew effect: Insights from machine learning. PLOS ONE 13:11, pages e0207919.
Crossref
Ádám Kun. (2018) Publish and Who Should Perish: You or Science?. Publications 6:2, pages 18.
Crossref
Adrian G. Barnett, Philip Clarke, Cedryck Vaquette & Nicholas Graves. (2017) Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study. Research Integrity and Peer Review 2:1.
Crossref
Krist Vaesen & Joel Katzav. (2017) How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?. PLOS ONE 12:9, pages e0183967.
Crossref
Gemma Derrick & Gabrielle Samuel. (2017) The future of societal impact assessment using peer review: pre-evaluation training, consensus building and inter-reviewer reliability. Palgrave Communications 3:1.
Crossref
Chantal Leclerc, Bruno Bourassa & Christian Macé. (2017) Dérives de la recherche et détresse psychologique chez les universitairesUniversity Research and Psychological Distress Among Academic StaffDerivas de la investigación y la angustia psicológica entre los universitarios. Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé:19-2.
Crossref
Samuel Moore, Cameron Neylon, Martin Paul Eve, Daniel Paul O’Donnell & Damian Pattinson. (2017) “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence. Palgrave Communications 3:1.
Crossref
Susan Guthrie, Ioana Ghiga & Steven Wooding. (2018) What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?. F1000Research 6, pages 1335.
Crossref
Susan Guthrie, Ioana Ghiga & Steven Wooding. (2017) What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?. F1000Research 6, pages 1335.
Crossref
Katalin Szaszi. (2015) A Basic Scientist's Reflections on Research Funding. Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease 2, pages 87.
Crossref
Daniel Mietchen. (2014) The Transformative Nature of Transparency in Research Funding. PLoS Biology 12:12, pages e1002027.
Crossref
Cobi Smith. (2014) Public Engagement in Prioritizing Research Proposals. SAGE Open 4:1, pages 215824401452379.
Crossref
Jean-Michel Fortin & David J. Currie. (2013) Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding. PLoS ONE 8:6, pages e65263.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.