2,095
Views
113
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH REPORTS

Moral Sensitivity in the Context of Socioscientific Issues in High School Science Students

, &
Pages 279-296 | Published online: 12 Dec 2008

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (24)

Banu Avsar Erumit, Bahadir Namdar & Ayşegül Oğuz Namdar. (2023) Promoting preservice teachers’ global citizenship and contextualised NOS views through role-play activities integrated into place-based SSI instruction on climate issues. International Journal of Science Education 0:0, pages 1-30.
Read now
Tore van der Leij, Martin Goedhart, Lucy Avraamidou & Arjen Wals. (2023) Designing a module for supporting secondary biology students’ morality through socioscientific issues in the human-nature context. Journal of Biological Education 0:0, pages 1-18.
Read now
Ma. Glenda Lopez Wui, Jie Zhang, Jackie Eunjung Relyea, Sissy S. Wong & Rosa Nam. (2023) The intersection of perceptions of classroom openness with civic engagement among young urban adolescents in science classroom. Applied Developmental Science 27:1, pages 34-47.
Read now
Iann Lundegård, Leena Arvanitis, Karim Hamza, Linda Schenk, Andrzej Wojcik & Karin Haglund. (2022) Facts and values in students’ reasoning about gene technology in the frame of risk – a thick comprehension. Environmental Education Research 28:9, pages 1283-1296.
Read now
Tore Van Der Leij, Lucy Avraamidou, Arjen Wals & Martin Goedhart. (2022) Supporting Secondary Students’ Morality Development in Science Education. Studies in Science Education 58:2, pages 141-181.
Read now
Jeremy W. Melton, Jepri Ali Saiful & Paichi Pat Shein. (2022) Interdisciplinary STEM program on authentic aerosol science research and students’ systems thinking approach in problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education 44:9, pages 1419-1439.
Read now
Isabelle de Oliveira Moraes, Rafaela Magalhães Aires & Andréa Carla de Souza Góes. (2021) Science fiction and science education: 1984 in classroom. International Journal of Science Education 43:15, pages 2501-2515.
Read now
Lynne Zummo, Emma Gargroetzi & Antero Garcia. (2021) How youth use scientific argumentation in civic participation on climate change: polar bears, the Great Barrier Reef, and ‘your job as president’. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 11:4, pages 362-377.
Read now
Mark H. Newton & Dana L. Zeidler. (2020) Developing socioscientific perspective taking. International Journal of Science Education 42:8, pages 1302-1319.
Read now
Andrew T. Kinslow, Troy D. Sadler & Hai T. Nguyen. (2019) Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class. Environmental Education Research 25:3, pages 388-410.
Read now
S. R. Fowler & D. L. Zeidler. (2016) Lack of Evolution Acceptance Inhibits Students’ Negotiation of Biology-based Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Biological Education 50:4, pages 407-424.
Read now
Helen Morris. (2014) Socioscientific Issues and Multidisciplinarity in School Science Textbooks. International Journal of Science Education 36:7, pages 1137-1158.
Read now
Jan Alexis Nielsen. (2013) Delusions About Evidence: On Why Scientific Evidence Should Not Be the Main Concern in Socioscientific Decision Making. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 13:4, pages 373-385.
Read now
Mats Gunnar Lindahl & Cedric Linder. (2013) Students’ Ontological Security and Agency in Science Education—An Example from Reasoning about the Use of Gene Technology. International Journal of Science Education 35:14, pages 2299-2330.
Read now
Hyunju Lee, Jungsook Yoo, Kyunghee Choi, Sung-Won Kim, Joseph Krajcik, Benjamin C. Herman & Dana L. Zeidler. (2013) Socioscientific Issues as a Vehicle for Promoting Character and Values for Global Citizens. International Journal of Science Education 35:12, pages 2079-2113.
Read now
Teodora Kolarova, Isa Hadjiali & Iliya Denev. (2013) High School Students' Reasoning in Making Decisions about Socio-Ethical Issues of Genetic Engineering: Case of Gene Therapy. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 27:2, pages 3737-3747.
Read now
Helena Črne-Hladnik, Aleš Hladnik, Branka Javornik, Katarina Košmelj & Cirila Peklaj. (2012) Is Judgement of Biotechnological Ethical Aspects Related to High School Students' Knowledge?. International Journal of Science Education 34:8, pages 1277-1296.
Read now
Hyunju Lee, Hyunsook Chang, Kyunghee Choi, Sung-Won Kim & Dana L. Zeidler. (2012) Developing Character and Values for Global Citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education 34:6, pages 925-953.
Read now
Bev France, Helen A. Mora & Jacquie L. Bay. (2012) Changing Perspectives: Exploring a pedagogy to examine other perspectives about stem cell research. International Journal of Science Education 34:5, pages 803-824.
Read now
Jan Alexis Nielsen. (2012) Co-opting Science: A preliminary study of how students invoke science in value-laden discussions. International Journal of Science Education 34:2, pages 275-299.
Read now
TroyD. Sadler. (2009) Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education 45:1, pages 1-42.
Read now
Kai-Yu Tang, Tzu-Chiang Lin & Ying-Shao Hsu. Status and trends of socioscientific issues in educational literature: insights and extensions from a co-word analysis. International Journal of Science Education 0:0, pages 1-25.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (89)

David C. Owens & Michael J. Reiss. (2023) What’s in a name? The use of induced perspective taking to inform arguments about the appropriateness of the term “Chinavirus” when talking about COVID-19. Cultural Studies of Science Education 18:4, pages 1149-1168.
Crossref
Qiangqiang Li & Gengdan Hu. (2023) Positive impacts of perceived social support on prosocial behavior: the chain mediating role of moral identity and moral sensitivity. Frontiers in Psychology 14.
Crossref
Mark H. Newton, Len A. Annetta & Denise M. Bressler. (2023) Using Extended Reality Technology in Traditional and Place-Based Environments to Study Climate Change. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Crossref
Elianne M. Gerrits, Lars S. Assen, Liesbeth Noordegraaf-Eelens, Annelien L. Bredenoord & Marc H. W. van Mil. (2023) Moral imagination as an instrument for ethics education for biomedical researchers. International Journal of Ethics Education.
Crossref
Nyet Moi Siew & Jamilah Ahmad. (2023) THE EFFECTS OF SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES WITH THINKING WHEEL MAP APPROACH ON CURIOSITY TOWARDS STEM OF YEAR FIVE STUDENTS. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 81:1, pages 130-143.
Crossref
Jessica Shuk Ching Leung & Maurice Man Wai Cheng. (2022) Prioritizing emotion objects in making sense of student learning of socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 60:2, pages 357-389.
Crossref
Mª Paz Pozo-Muñoz, Carolina Martín-Gámez, Leticia Concepción Velasco-Martínez & Juan Carlos Tójar-Hurtado. (2023) Research and Development of Environmental Awareness about Water in Primary Education Students through Their Drawings. Education Sciences 13:2, pages 119.
Crossref
Jaekwoun Shim. (2023) Investigating the effectiveness of introducing virtual reality to elementary school students' moral education. Computers & Education: X Reality 2, pages 100010.
Crossref
Lynne M. Zummo. (2022) Disagreement as context for science-civic learning: an analysis of discursive resources brought to bear by high school science students. Cultural Studies of Science Education 17:4, pages 1115-1139.
Crossref
Yuxin Yang, Jieying Huang, Pingping Wu, Xujiang Zheng, Han Lin & Shule Ji. (2022) Responsible leadership and project citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Jessica Shuk Ching Leung. (2021) Shifting the Teaching Beliefs of Preservice Science Teachers About Socioscientific Issues in a Teacher Education Course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 20:4, pages 659-682.
Crossref
Mageswary Karpudewan & Lang Hiong Chan. (2020) Educating primary students on infectious diseases and nurturing character and values using socioscientific instruction. Journal of Public Health 30:4, pages 885-895.
Crossref
Shu-Sheng Lin. 2022. Innovative Approaches to Socioscientific Issues and Sustainability Education. Innovative Approaches to Socioscientific Issues and Sustainability Education 159 178 .
William Romine, Rutuja Mahajan & Amber Todd. (2021) Measuring Science Teachers' Emotional Experiences with Evolution using Real World Scenarios. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education 1:1, pages 1-26.
Crossref
Abby E. Beatty, Emily P. Driessen, Taylor Gusler, Sharday Ewell, Amy Grilliot & Cissy J. Ballen. (2021) Teaching the Tough Topics: Fostering Ideological Awareness through the Inclusion of Societally Impactful Topics in Introductory Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education 20:4.
Crossref
Michel Vidal, Jean Simonneaux & Ralph Levinson. (2021) The role of myths in students discussing ‘pest’–agriculture relations. Cultural Studies of Science Education 16:4, pages 1197-1209.
Crossref
Publisher EJHBE. (2021) https://www.ejhbe.com/notification-about-the-doi. European Journal of Health and Biology Education 10:1.
Crossref
Karen L. Boyd. (2021) Datasheets for Datasets help ML Engineers Notice and Understand Ethical Issues in Training Data. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5:CSCW2, pages 1-27.
Crossref
Tore van der Leij, Lucy Avraamidou, Arjen Wals & Martin Goedhart. (2021) Biology Students’ Morality When Engaged With Moral Dilemmas in the Human-Nature Context. Frontiers in Education 6.
Crossref
Bahadir Namdar & Aysegul Oguz Namdar. (2021) Fostering Students’ Values Through Role Play about Socioscientific Issues. The Physics Teacher 59:6, pages 497-499.
Crossref
Bircan TÜZÜNGÜÇ, Ozgur DOGAN & Çiğdem HAN. (2021) SOSYOBİLİMSEL MUHAKEME YETENEĞİ ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRKÇEYE UYARLAMA, GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASIADAPTATION OF SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC REASONING SCALE TO TURKISH: A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 20:79, pages 1060-1078.
Crossref
Benjamin C. Herman, Mark H. Newton & Dana L. Zeidler. (2021) Impact of place‐based socioscientific issues instruction on students' contextualization of socioscientific orientations. Science Education 105:4, pages 585-627.
Crossref
Silvia Alcaraz-Dominguez & Mario Barajas. (2021) Conceiving Socioscientific Issues in STEM Lessons from Science Education Research and Practice. Education Sciences 11:5, pages 238.
Crossref
Safwatun Nida, Vita Ria Mustikasari & Ingo Eilks. (2021) Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17:1, pages em1932.
Crossref
Sami Kahn. 2021. Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development. Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development 1 30 .
NEI NUNES-NETO & DÁLIA MELISSA CONRADO. (2021) ENSINANDO ÉTICA. Educação em Revista 37.
Crossref
Benjamin C. Herman, Dana L. Zeidler & Mark Newton. (2018) Students’ Emotive Reasoning Through Place-Based Environmental Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education 50:5, pages 2081-2109.
Crossref
İlke YILDIRIM & Hasan BAKIRCI. (2020) Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modeline Dayalı Fen Öğretiminin Sekizinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Sosyobilimsel Konular Hakkındaki Görüşlerine Yansımasının İncelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 21:2, pages 1051-1070.
Crossref
Bhyung-ho Yoo, Youngsun Kwak & Won-Mi Park. (2020) Analysis of Argumentation Structure in Students’ Writing on Socio-scientific issues (SSI): Focusing on the Unit of Climate Change in High School Earth Science I. Journal of the Korean earth science society 41:4, pages 405-414.
Crossref
Jacob Pleasants. (2020) Inquiring into the Nature of STEM Problems. Science & Education 29:4, pages 831-855.
Crossref
Augusto Z. MacalalagJr.Jr., Joseph Johnson & Michelle Lai. (2019) How do we do this: learning how to teach socioscientific issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education 15:2, pages 389-413.
Crossref
Vaille Dawson & Katherine Carson. (2018) Introducing Argumentation About Climate Change Socioscientific Issues in a Disadvantaged School. Research in Science Education 50:3, pages 863-883.
Crossref
Belinda von Mengersen & Terry Wilkinson. 2020. Pedagogy for Technology Education in Secondary Schools. Pedagogy for Technology Education in Secondary Schools 151 175 .
Dana L. Zeidler, Benjamin C. Herman & Troy D. Sadler. (2019) New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 1:1.
Crossref
Susanne Rafolt, Suzanne Kapelari & Kerstin Kremer. (2019) Kritisches Denken im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht – Synergiemodell, Problemlage und DesiderataCritical Thinking in the Science Classroom—Synergy Model, Challenges and Desiderata. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 25:1, pages 63-75.
Crossref
Mats G. Lindahl, Anne‐Mari Folkesson & Dana L. Zeidler. (2019) Students' recognition of educational demands in the context of a socioscientific issues curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56:9, pages 1155-1182.
Crossref
Sami Kahn & Dana L. Zeidler. (2019) A Conceptual Analysis of Perspective Taking in Support of Socioscientific Reasoning. Science & Education 28:6-7, pages 605-638.
Crossref
Bibin Rubini, D. Ardianto, S. Setyaningsih & A. Sariningrum. (2019) Using Socio-scientific Issues in Problem Based Learning to Enhance Science Literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1233:1, pages 012073.
Crossref
Ulrika Bossér & Mats Lindahl. (2017) Students’ Positioning in the Classroom: a Study of Teacher-Student Interactions in a Socioscientific Issue Context. Research in Science Education 49:2, pages 371-390.
Crossref
Sophia Jeong, Deborah J. Tippins, Kimberly Haverkos, Mel Kutner, Shakhnoza Kayumova & Stacey Britton. 2019. Converting STEM into STEAM Programs. Converting STEM into STEAM Programs 285 305 .
Mario Fernando Gutiérrez Romero. (2018) Socioscientific Argumentation and Model-Based Reasoning: A Study on Mining Exploitation in Colombia. Universitas Psychologica 17:5, pages 1-12.
Crossref
Andréa Carla de Souza Góes, Danielle Cristina Duque Estrada Borim, Daniel Kaufman, Ana Carolina Clemente dos Santos, Andréa Espinola de Siqueira & Magui Aparecida Vallim. (2018) A obra Admirável mundo novo no ensino interdisciplinar: fonte de reflexões sobre Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade. Ciência & Educação (Bauru) 24:3, pages 563-580.
Crossref
Jun-Ki Lee, Sein Shin & Hyo Hyun Yoo. (2018) Exploring the Ontological Status of the Race Concept as Perceived by Korean Medical Students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14:10.
Crossref
Dilek KARIŞAN, Özgül YILMAZ-TÜZÜN & Dana ZEİDLER. (2018) Pre-service teachers’ reflective judgment skills in the context of socio-scientific issues based inquiry laboratory courseÖğretmen adaylarının sosyo-bilimsel konular temelli fen laboratuvarı dersindeki yansıtıcı muhakeme becerileri. Turkish Journal of Education 7:2, pages 99-116.
Crossref
爽 敬. (2018) A Review of Moral Sensitivity. Advances in Psychology 08:11, pages 1701-1706.
Crossref
Claire Polo, Christian Plantin, Kristine Lund & Gerald Peter Niccolai. (2017) Emotional positioning as a cognitive resource for arguing. Pragmatics and Society 8:3, pages 323-354.
Crossref
Sihan Xiao & William A. Sandoval. (2017) Associations Between Attitudes Towards Science and Children’s Evaluation of Information About Socioscientific Issues. Science & Education 26:3-4, pages 247-269.
Crossref
Sami Kahn & Dana L. Zeidler. (2017) A case for the use of conceptual analysis in science education research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54:4, pages 538-551.
Crossref
William L. Romine, Troy D. Sadler & Andrew T. Kinslow. (2017) Assessment of scientific literacy: Development and validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio-Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54:2, pages 274-295.
Crossref
Yeon-A Son. (2016) A Suggestion of the new construction of science education stressed social responsibility and the education strategies to integrate Education for Sustainable Development into science education. Journal of Education & Culture 22:6, pages 279-312.
Crossref
Carolina Castano Rodriguez. (2015) Which values regarding nature and other species are we promoting in the Australian science curriculum?. Cultural Studies of Science Education 11:4, pages 999-1021.
Crossref
Jisun Park & Jinwoong Song. (2016) Elementary School Teachers' Ethical Sensitivity on Socio-scientific Issues. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education 35:4, pages 416-425.
Crossref
Dana L. Zeidler. (2014) STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education 11:1, pages 11-26.
Crossref
Seongdeok Kim & Hyonam Kim. (2016) Development of a Science Ethicality Test for Elementary School Students. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 36:1, pages 1-13.
Crossref
Yoonsook Chung, Jungsook Yoo, Sung-Won Kim, Hyunju Lee & Dana L. Zeidler. (2014) ENHANCING STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN THE SCIENCE CLASSROOM THROUGH SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14:1, pages 1-27.
Crossref
김현정, WooAeJa & 양정은. (2015) Effect of Socio-Scientific Issues(SSI) Classes on the Decision-Making and the Character and Value. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 19:4, pages 983-1003.
Crossref
Hunkoog Jho. (2015) A Literature Review of Studies on Decision-making in Socio-scientific Issues. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 35:5, pages 791-804.
Crossref
Yeonjoo Ko, Yunhee Choi & Hyunju Lee. (2015) Development of an Analytical Framework for Dialogic Argumentation in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: Based on Discourse Clusters and Schemes. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 35:3, pages 509-521.
Crossref
Youngmi Choi, Inwhan Kim & Sungmin Im. (2015) The Relationships between Moral Sensitivity and Preference for Science, Belief about Learning Science of Middle School Students. Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education 35:1, pages 65-72.
Crossref
Sri Rahayu. 2015. Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education. Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education 29 49 .
Karey Burek & Dana L. Zeidler. 2015. EcoJustice, Citizen Science and Youth Activism. EcoJustice, Citizen Science and Youth Activism 425 441 .
EUN OK HAN, JAE ROK KIM & YOON SEOK CHOI. (2014) KOREAN STUDENTS' BEHAVIORAL CHANGE TOWARD NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION THROUGH EDUCATION. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 46:5, pages 707-718.
Crossref
Soo-Meen Wee, Ji-Young Yoon & Sung-Man Lim. (2014) An Analysis on argumentation structure development of preservice teachers through argumentative writing on earth science related SSI. Journal of the Korean society of earth science education 7:1, pages 11-23.
Crossref
Eunok HanJaerok KimYoonseok Choi. (2014) Using education on irradiated foods to change behavior of Korean elementary, middle, and high school students. Nutrition Research and Practice 8:5, pages 595.
Crossref
Ahmet Kılınç, Tezcan Kartal, Barış Eroğlu, Ümit Demiral, Özlem Afacan, Dilber Polat, Mutlu P. Demirci Guler & Özkan Görgülü. (2013) Preservice Science Teachers’ Efficacy Regarding a Socioscientific Issue: A Belief System Approach. Research in Science Education 43:6, pages 2455-2475.
Crossref
Ying-Tien Wu. (2012) University Students’ Knowledge Structures and Informal Reasoning on the Use of Genetically Modified Foods: Multidimensional Analyses. Research in Science Education 43:5, pages 1873-1890.
Crossref
Erica N. Blatt. (2012) Exploring environmental identity and behavioral change in an Environmental Science course. Cultural Studies of Science Education 8:2, pages 467-488.
Crossref
Claire Polo, Christian Plantin, Kristine Lund & Gérald Niccolai. (2013) Quand construire une position émotionnelle, c'est choisir une conclusion argumentative : le cas d'un café-débat sur l'eau potable au Mexique1. Semen:35.
Crossref
권혜선 & Sun Jin Yun. (2013) Interpretation of Environmental Issues and the Nature of Environmental Moral Sensitivity of Elementary, Middle, and High School Students by Age and Gender. KOREAN ELEMENTARY MORAL EDUCATION SOCIETY null:41, pages 1-32.
Crossref
Rebecca Ann Lind & Tammy Swenson-Lepper. (2011) Measuring Sensitivity to Conflicts of Interest: A Preliminary Test of Method. Science and Engineering Ethics 19:1, pages 43-62.
Crossref
Jiyoung Jang, Jiyeong Mun, Hyo-Suk Ryu, Kyunghee Choi, Krajcik Joseph & Sung-Won Kim. (2012) Korean Middle School Students' Perceptions as Global Citizens of Socioscientific Issues. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 32:7, pages 1124-1138.
Crossref
Jan Alexis Nielsen. (2012) Science in discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socioscientific discussions. Science Education 96:3, pages 428-456.
Crossref
Changwoo Jeong. (2012) A Study on the Improvement of Content and Teaching Methods for Ethics Education of Science and Technology in Moral Education. Journal of Moral & Ethics Education null:35, pages 25-50.
Crossref
Jung-Eun Yang, Hyun-Jeong Kim, Lei Gao, Eun-Jin Kim, Sung-Won Kim & Hyun-Ju Lee. (2012) Perceptions of Science Teachers on Socioscientific Issues as an Instructional Tool for Creativity and Character Education. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 32:1, pages 113-128.
Crossref
Helen J. Boon. (2011) Regional Queensland parents’ views of science education: some unexpected perceptions. The Australian Educational Researcher 39:1, pages 17-43.
Crossref
Elina Kuusisto, Kirsi Tirri & Inkeri Rissanen. (2012) Finnish Teachers’ Ethical Sensitivity. Education Research International 2012, pages 1-10.
Crossref
Andy Cavagnetto & Brian Hand. 2012. Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation. Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation 39 53 .
Mats Gunnar Lindahl. (2011) Alister Jones, Anne Kim and Michael Reiss (eds): Ethics in the Science and Technology Classroom: A New Approach to Teaching and Learning. Science & Education 20:9, pages 927-929.
Crossref
Bev France & Jacquie Bay. 2011. Développement durable et autres questions d'actualité. Développement durable et autres questions d'actualité 325 338 .
Dana L. Zeidler, Scott M. Applebaum & Troy D. Sadler. 2011. Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom. Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom 277 305 .
Glen Aikenhead. 2011. The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching. The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching 107 127 .
Jennie S. Brotman, Felicia Moore Mensah & Nancy Lesko. (2010) Urban high school students' learning about HIV/AIDS in different contexts. Science Education 95:1, pages 87-120.
Crossref
Orit Ben-Zvi-Assaraf & Nitzan Ayal. (2010) Harnessing the Environmental Professional Expertise of Engineering Students—The Course: “Environmental Management Systems in the Industry”. Journal of Science Education and Technology 19:6, pages 532-545.
Crossref
Andy R. Cavagnetto. (2010) Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy. Review of Educational Research 80:3, pages 336-371.
Crossref
Mats Gunnar Lindahl. (2010) Of Pigs and Men: Understanding Students’ Reasoning About the Use of Pigs as Donors for Xenotransplantation. Science & Education 19:9, pages 867-894.
Crossref
Jennie S. Brotman, Felicia Moore Mensah & Nancy Lesko. (2010) Exploring identities to deepen understanding of urban high school students' sexual health decision‐making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47:6, pages 742-762.
Crossref
Mustafa Sabri Kocakülah. (2009) Development and Application of a Rubric for Evaluating Students’ Performance on Newton’s Laws of Motion. Journal of Science Education and Technology 19:2, pages 146-164.
Crossref
Michael P. Mueller & Dana L. Zeidler. 2010. Cultural Studies and Environmentalism. Cultural Studies and Environmentalism 105 128 .
Dana L. Zeidler & Bryan H. Nichols. (2009) Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education 21:2, pages 49-58.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.