Citations (35)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (4)
Gulfem Dilek Yurttas-Kumlu. (2022) Metaconceptual activities of pre-service science teachers about the design of process to teach science concept. International Journal of Science Education 44:10, pages 1639-1658.
Read now
Read now
Kerstin Danckwardt-Lillieström, Maria Andrée & Margareta Enghag. (2020) The drama of chemistry – supporting student explorations of electronegativity and chemical bonding through creative drama in upper secondary school. International Journal of Science Education 42:11, pages 1862-1894.
Read now
Read now
Maurice M. W. Cheng & Pey-Tee Oon. (2016) Understanding metallic bonding: Structure, process and interaction by Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education 38:12, pages 1923-1944.
Read now
Read now
Jan Christoph Hadenfeldt, Xiufeng Liu & Knut Neumann. (2014) Framing students’ progression in understanding matter: a review of previous research. Studies in Science Education 50:2, pages 181-208.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (31)
Elisabeth Hofer & Rosina Steininger. (2023) Does it occur or not? – A structured approach to support students in determining the spontaneity of chemical reactions. Chemistry Teacher International 0:0.
Crossref
Crossref
Canan NAKİBOĞLU. (2022) Usage of Graphic Organizers in Upper-Secondary School Chemistry TextbooksOrtaöğretim Kimya Ders Kitaplarında Grafik Düzenleyici Kullanımı. Maarif Mektepleri Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 6:2, pages 1-31.
Crossref
Crossref
Vicente Talanquer. (2022) The Complexity of Reasoning about and with Chemical Representations. JACS Au 2:12, pages 2658-2669.
Crossref
Crossref
Kathleen A. Bowe, Christopher F. Bauer, Ying Wang & Scott E. Lewis. (2022) When All You Have Is a Covalent Model of Bonding, Every Substance Is a Molecule: A Longitudinal Study of Student Enactment of Covalent and Ionic Bonding Models. Journal of Chemical Education 99:8, pages 2808-2820.
Crossref
Crossref
Kevin H. Hunter, Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez & Nicole M. Becker. (2022) A Review of Research on the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Chemical Education 99:7, pages 2451-2464.
Crossref
Crossref
Lina Zhang, Lei Wang & David F. Treagust. (2021) Discipline-specific cognitive factors that influence grade 9 students’ performance in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 22:4, pages 813-841.
Crossref
Crossref
Munzil Munzil & Mada Karipura Panca Rosa Perwira. Development of e-learning based inquiry guided and VARK learning style on the topic of chemical bond as teaching material in COVID-19 pandemic era. Development of e-learning based inquiry guided and VARK learning style on the topic of chemical bond as teaching material in COVID-19 pandemic era.
Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez, Avery R. Stricker & Nicole M. Becker. (2020) Exploring the Productive Use of Metonymy: Applying Coordination Class Theory to Investigate Student Conceptions of Rate in Relation to Reaction Coordinate Diagrams. Journal of Chemical Education 97:8, pages 2065-2077.
Crossref
Crossref
W Sumarni. (2020) Understanding of chemical content in high school: difficulties from the teacher’s perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1567:4, pages 042002.
Crossref
Crossref
Canan NAKİBOĞLU & Şafak YILDIRIM. (2020) Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin Metalik Bağ ile ilgili Algıları, Metalik Bağı Tanımlamada Kullandıkları Metaforlar ve Yaptıkları Benzeşimler. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, pages 1-11.
Crossref
Crossref
Rıdvan ELMAS. (2020) Bağlamın Anlamı ve Nitelikleri ve Öğrencilerin Fen Eğitiminde Bağlam TercihleriThe Meaning and Characteristics of Context and Students’ Context Preferences in Science Education. Turkiye Kimya Dernegi Dergisi Kısım C: Kimya Egitimi 5:1, pages 53-70.
Crossref
Crossref
Canan Nakiboğlu & Nuri Nakiboğlu. (2019) Exploring prospective chemistry teachers’ perceptions of precipitation, conception of precipitation reactions and visualization of the sub-microscopic level of precipitation reactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 20:4, pages 873-889.
Crossref
Crossref
Şenol ŞEN, Lütfiye VAROĞLU & Ayhan YILMAZ. (2019) Cognitive Structures and Misconceptions with a Thematic Framework: The Case of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Education and Future:16, pages 65-78.
Crossref
Crossref
Canan NAKİBOĞLU. (2018) Ortaokul Fen Bilimleri Ders Kitaplarında Grafik Düzenleyici Kullanımının İncelenmesi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, pages 1-23.
Crossref
Crossref
Georgios Tsaparlis, Eleni T. Pappa & Bill Byers. (2018) Teaching and learning chemical bonding: research-based evidence for misconceptions and conceptual difficulties experienced by students in upper secondary schools and the effect of an enriched text. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19:4, pages 1253-1269.
Crossref
Crossref
Ricky Yuen-Ki Chiu, Derek Sin-Pui Cheung & Wilfred Wing-Fat Lau. (2017) The Effects of Electronic Textbook Implementation on Students' Learning in a Chemistry Classroom. The Effects of Electronic Textbook Implementation on Students' Learning in a Chemistry Classroom.
Li Ye, Razanne Oueini & Scott E. Lewis. (2015) Developing and Implementing an Assessment Technique To Measure Linked Concepts. Journal of Chemical Education 92:11, pages 1807-1812.
Crossref
Crossref
Nikita L. Burrows & Suazette Reid Mooring. (2015) Using concept mapping to uncover students' knowledge structures of chemical bonding concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16:1, pages 53-66.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith S. Taber. 2015. Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education. Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education
133
158
.
Gulten Sendur. (2014) Are creative comparisons developed by prospective chemistry teachers evidence of their conceptual understanding? The case of inter- and intramolecular forces. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15:4, pages 689-719.
Crossref
Crossref
Abdi-Rizak M. Warfa, Gillian H. Roehrig, Jamie L. Schneider & James Nyachwaya. (2014) Collaborative discourse and the modeling of solution chemistry with magnetic 3D physical models – impact and characterization. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15:4, pages 835-848.
Crossref
Crossref
Harkirat S. Dhindsa & David F. Treagust. (2014) Prospective pedagogy for teaching chemical bonding for smart and sustainable learning. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15:4, pages 435-446.
Crossref
Crossref
Frank Weinhold & Roger A. Klein. (2014) What is a hydrogen bond? Resonance covalency in the supramolecular domain. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15:3, pages 276-285.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith S. Taber. 2014. Learning with Understanding in the Chemistry Classroom. Learning with Understanding in the Chemistry Classroom
5
23
.
Anna Bergqvist, Michal Drechsler, Onno De Jong & Shu-Nu Chang Rundgren. (2013) Representations of chemical bonding models in school textbooks – help or hindrance for understanding?. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14:4, pages 589-606.
Crossref
Crossref
Yıldızay Ayyıldız & Leman Tarhan. (2013) Case study applications in chemistry lesson: gases, liquids, and solids. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14:4, pages 408-420.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith S. TaberKeith S. Taber. 2013. Modelling Learners and Learning in Science Education. Modelling Learners and Learning in Science Education
119
139
.
Keith S. Taber. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
391
418
.
George Papageorgiou. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
319
329
.
Keith S. Taber. (2012) Vive la Différence? Comparing “Like with Like” in Studies of Learners’ Ideas in Diverse Educational Contexts. Education Research International 2012, pages 1-12.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith S. Taber. (2012) The international dimension of Chemistry Education Research and Practice. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 13:4, pages 398-400.
Crossref
Crossref