Citations (136)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (44)
Büşra Özyalçın & Filiz Avcı. (2022) Let’s get to learn the particulate structure of matter with augmented reality!: a jigsaw IV technique lesson plan. Science Activities 59:2, pages 68-83.
Read now
Read now
Alison Haas, Rita Januszyk, Scott E. Grapin, Marcelle Goggins, Lorena Llosa & Okhee Lee. (2021) Developing Instructional Materials Aligned to the Next Generation Science Standards for All Students, Including English Learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education 32:7, pages 735-756.
Read now
Read now
Emine Adadan & Müjde Müge Ataman. (2021) Promoting senior primary school students’ understanding of particulate nature of matter through inquiry instruction with multiple representations. Education 3-13 49:3, pages 317-329.
Read now
Read now
Deborah L. Hanuscin, Dante Cisterna & Kelsey Lipsitz. (2018) Elementary Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching Structure and Properties of Matter. Journal of Science Teacher Education 29:8, pages 665-692.
Read now
Read now
Elon Langbeheim & Sharona T. Levy. (2018) Feeling the forces within materials: bringing inter-molecular bonding to the fore using embodied modelling. International Journal of Science Education 40:13, pages 1567-1586.
Read now
Read now
Maurice M. W. Cheng & John K. Gilbert. (2017) Modelling students’ visualisation of chemical reaction. International Journal of Science Education 39:9, pages 1173-1193.
Read now
Read now
Maurice M. W. Cheng & Pey-Tee Oon. (2016) Understanding metallic bonding: Structure, process and interaction by Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education 38:12, pages 1923-1944.
Read now
Read now
Maher Z. Hashweh. (2016) The complexity of teaching density in middle school. Research in Science & Technological Education 34:1, pages 1-24.
Read now
Read now
Jan Christoph Hadenfeldt, Xiufeng Liu & Knut Neumann. (2014) Framing students’ progression in understanding matter: a review of previous research. Studies in Science Education 50:2, pages 181-208.
Read now
Read now
Maurice M. W. Cheng & John K. Gilbert. (2014) Students' Visualization of Metallic Bonding and the Malleability of Metals. International Journal of Science Education 36:8, pages 1373-1407.
Read now
Read now
Keith
S. Taber, Georgios Tsaparlis & Canan Nakiboğlu. (2012) Student Conceptions of Ionic Bonding: Patterns of thinking across three European contexts. International Journal of Science Education 34:18, pages 2843-2873.
Read now
Read now
Rod Lane & Pamela Coutts. (2012) Students’ alternative conceptions of tropical cyclone causes and processes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 21:3, pages 205-222.
Read now
Read now
Muhammet Usak, Mustafa Ozden & Ingo Eilks. (2011) A case study of beginning science teachers’ subject matter (SMK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of teaching chemical reaction in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education 34:4, pages 407-429.
Read now
Read now
George Papageorgiou, Maria Grammaticopoulou & Phil
Michael Johnson. (2010) Should we Teach Primary Pupils about Chemical Change?. International Journal of Science Education 32:12, pages 1647-1664.
Read now
Read now
AnnS. Rosebery, Mark Ogonowski, Mary DiSchino & Beth Warren. (2010) “The Coat Traps All Your Body Heat”: Heterogeneity as Fundamental to Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences 19:3, pages 322-357.
Read now
Read now
Georgios Tsitsipis, Dimitrios Stamovlasis & George Papageorgiou. (2010) The Effect of Three Cognitive Variables on Students’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter and its Changes of State. International Journal of Science Education 32:8, pages 987-1016.
Read now
Read now
George Papageorgiou, Dimitrios Stamovlasis & Phil
Michael Johnson. (2010) Primary Teachers’ Particle Ideas and Explanations of Physical Phenomena: Effect of an in‐service training course. International Journal of Science Education 32:5, pages 629-652.
Read now
Read now
Vicente Talanquer. (2009) On Cognitive Constraints and Learning Progressions: The case of “structure of matter”. International Journal of Science Education 31:15, pages 2123-2136.
Read now
Read now
Alejandra García Franco & KeithS. Taber. (2009) Secondary Students’ Thinking about Familiar Phenomena: Learners’ explanations from a curriculum context where ‘particles’ is a key idea for organising teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education 31:14, pages 1917-1952.
Read now
Read now
Emine Adadan, KarenE. Irving & KathyC. Trundle. (2009) Impacts of Multi‐representational Instruction on High School Students’ Conceptual Understandings of the Particulate Nature of Matter. International Journal of Science Education 31:13, pages 1743-1775.
Read now
Read now
Lena Löfgren & Gustav Helldén. (2009) A Longitudinal Study Showing how Students use a Molecule Concept when Explaining Everyday Situations. International Journal of Science Education 31:12, pages 1631-1655.
Read now
Read now
KeithS. Taber. (2009) College Students’ Conceptions of Chemical Stability: The widespread adoption of a heuristic rule out of context and beyond its range of application. International Journal of Science Education 31:10, pages 1333-1358.
Read now
Read now
Jana Bouwma‐Gearhart, James Stewart & Keffrelyn Brown. (2009) Student Misapplication of a Gas‐like Model to Explain Particle Movement in Heated Solids: Implications for curriculum and instruction towards students’ creation and revision of accurate explanatory models. International Journal of Science Education 31:9, pages 1157-1174.
Read now
Read now
Vaughan Prain, Russell Tytler & Suzanne Peterson. (2009) Multiple Representation in Learning About Evaporation. International Journal of Science Education 31:6, pages 787-808.
Read now
Read now
Karina Adbo & KeithS. Taber. (2009) Learners’ Mental Models of the Particle Nature of Matter: A study of 16‐year‐old Swedish science students. International Journal of Science Education 31:6, pages 757-786.
Read now
Read now
Rebecca McNall Krall, Kimberly H. Lott & Carol L. Wymer. (2009) Inservice Elementary and Middle School Teachers’ Conceptions of Photosynthesis and Respiration. Journal of Science Teacher Education 20:1, pages 41-55.
Read now
Read now
Elmar Uherek & Eva Schüpbach. (2008) European Efforts in Earth Science and Climate Change Education. Physical Geography 29:6, pages 545-560.
Read now
Read now
Jazilah Othman, DavidF. Treagust & A. L. Chandrasegaran. (2008) An Investigation into the Relationship between Students’ Conceptions of the Particulate Nature of Matter and their Understanding of Chemical Bonding. International Journal of Science Education 30:11, pages 1531-1550.
Read now
Read now
George Papageorgiou, Philip Johnson & Fotis Fotiades. (2008) Explaining melting and evaporation below boiling point. Can software help with particle ideas?. Research in Science & Technological Education 26:2, pages 165-183.
Read now
Read now
Aytekin Cokelez, Alain Dumon & KeithS. Taber. (2008) Upper Secondary French Students, Chemical Transformations and the “Register of Models”: A cross‐sectional study. International Journal of Science Education 30:6, pages 807-836.
Read now
Read now
Mojca Juriševič, SašaA. Glažar, Cveta Razdevšek Pučko & Iztok Devetak. (2008) Intrinsic Motivation of Pre‐service Primary School Teachers for Learning Chemistry in Relation to their Academic Achievement. International Journal of Science Education 30:1, pages 87-107.
Read now
Read now
KeithS. Taber. (2006) Beyond Constructivism: the Progressive Research Programme into Learning Science. Studies in Science Education 42:1, pages 125-184.
Read now
Read now
George Papageorgiou & Philip Johnson. (2005) Do Particle Ideas Help or Hinder Pupils’ Understanding of Phenomena?. International Journal of Science Education 27:11, pages 1299-1317.
Read now
Read now
Dilek Ardac & Sevil Akaygun. (2005) Using Static and Dynamic Visuals to Represent Chemical Change at Molecular Level. International Journal of Science Education 27:11, pages 1269-1298.
Read now
Read now
Dušan Krnel, Rod Watson & Saša A. Glažar. (2005) The development of the concept of ‘matter’: a cross‐age study of how children describe materials. International Journal of Science Education 27:3, pages 367-383.
Read now
Read now
Filiz Kabapinar, John Leach & Phil Scott. (2004) The design and evaluation of a teaching–learning sequence addressing the solubility concept with Turkish secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education 26:5, pages 635-652.
Read now
Read now
Ingemar Holgersson & Lena Löfgren. (2004) A long‐term study of students’ explanations of transformations of matter. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 4:1, pages 77-96.
Read now
Read now
GustavF. Helldén. (2004) A study of recurring core developmental features in students’ conceptions of some key ecological processes. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 4:1, pages 59-76.
Read now
Read now
Tina Jarvis, Anthony Pell & Frankie McKeon. (2003) Changes in Primary Teachers' Science Knowledge and Understanding During a Two Year In-service Programme. Research in Science & Technological Education 21:1, pages 17-42.
Read now
Read now
Philip Johnson. (2002) Children's understanding of substances, Part 2: Explaining chemical change. International Journal of Science Education 24:10, pages 1037-1054.
Read now
Read now
Philip Johnson. (2000) Children's understanding of substances, part 1: recognizing chemical change. International Journal of Science Education 22:7, pages 719-737.
Read now
Read now
Keith S. Taber. (2000) Multiple frameworks?: Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education 22:4, pages 399-417.
Read now
Read now
Philip Johnson. (1998) Children's understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, Part 2: Evaporation and condensation below boiling point. International Journal of Science Education 20:6, pages 695-709.
Read now
Read now
Philip Johnson. (1998) Children's understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, Part 1: Boiling water and the particle theory. International Journal of Science Education 20:5, pages 567-583.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (92)
Yi Yang, Yi-Xuan Liu, Xin-Hao Song, Jian-Xin Yao & Yu-Ying Guo. (2023) A tale of two progressions: students’ learning progression of the particle nature of matter and teachers’ perception on the progression. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 5:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Elon Langbeheim, Sevil Akaygun, Emine Adadan, Manzini Hlatshwayo & Umesh Ramnarain. (2022) Relating Pictorial and Verbal Forms of Assessments of the Particle Model of Matter in Two Communities of Students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 21:8, pages 2185-2201.
Crossref
Crossref
Katherine E. Castellano & Jamie N. Mikeska. (2023) Developing and using a scalable assessment to measure preservice elementary teachers' content knowledge for teaching about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Crossref
Crossref
Julie Vaiopoulou, Themistocles Tsikalas, Dimitrios Stamovlasis & George Papageorgiou. (2023) Conceptual understanding in science learning and the role of four psychometric variables: a person-centered approach. Frontiers in Psychology 14.
Crossref
Crossref
Bahar PAZAR & Sevilay KARAMUSTAFAOĞLU. (2023) “Saf Madde ve Karışımlar” Ünitesi Başarı Testi Geliştirme: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik“Pure Substances and Mixtures” Unit Achievement Test Development: Validity and Reliability. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 7:2, pages 404-432.
Crossref
Crossref
Julie Vaiopoulou, Themistocles Tsikalas, Dimitrios Stamovlasis & George Papageorgiou. (2023) Neo-Piagetian Predictors of Students’ Performance in Science Learning: Evidence from Primary Education. Behavioral Sciences 13:1, pages 64.
Crossref
Crossref
Elon Langbeheim, Einat Ben-Eliyahu, Emine Adadan, Sevil Akaygun & Umesh Dewnarain Ramnarain. (2022) Intersecting visual and verbal representations and levels of reasoning in the structure of matter learning progression. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 23:4, pages 969-979.
Crossref
Crossref
Mei-Hung Chiu. (2022) My journey in chemistry education. Pure and Applied Chemistry 94:8, pages 919-941.
Crossref
Crossref
Hamad Karous, Brigitte Nihant & Bernard Leyh. (2022) Conceptual change in chemistry schematic modelling: a cross-sectional study of 10th–12th-grade Belgian students. Canadian Journal of Chemistry 100:8, pages 633-648.
Crossref
Crossref
Fatima Baji & Carole Haeusler. (2021) Introducing Iranian Primary Children to Atoms and Molecules. Research in Science Education 52:4, pages 1387-1418.
Crossref
Crossref
Ουρανία Γκικοπούλου. (2022) Ο μικρόκοσμος στο δημοτικό – κάνοντας «ορατά» τα μη-ορατά σωματίδια της ύλης. Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society 27:1, pages 86-111.
Crossref
Crossref
Florian Budimaier & Martin Hopf. (2022) STUDENTS’ IDEAS ON COMMON EXPERIMENTS ABOUT THE PARTICULATE NATURE OF MATTER. Journal of Baltic Science Education 21:3, pages 381-397.
Crossref
Crossref
Lihua Xu. (2021) Towards a Social Semiotic Interpretation of the Chemistry Triangle: Student Exploration of Changes of State in an Australian Secondary Science Classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 20:4, pages 705-726.
Crossref
Crossref
Yıldızay AYYILDIZ & Esra ÇUBUKÇU. (2022) 9. Sınıf Kimya Konularındaki Yanlış Kavramalar Üzerine Bir İçerik AnaliziA Content Analysis on the Misconceptions in 9th Grade Chemistry Subjects. Turkiye Kimya Dernegi Dergisi Kısım C: Kimya Egitimi 7:1, pages 73-124.
Crossref
Crossref
Nurdiana Abdullah, Syuhaida Ismail & Johari Surif. (2022) Malaysia Secondary Students' Conceptions about the Particulate Nature of Matter. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Informatics 16, pages 32-40.
Crossref
Crossref
Hugo Vieira & Carla Morais. (2021) Bridging Music and Chemistry: A Marching Band Analogy to Teach Kinetic-Molecular Theory. Journal of Chemical Education 99:2, pages 729-735.
Crossref
Crossref
Davut Sarıtaş, Hasan Özcan & Agustín Adúriz-Bravo. (2021) Observation and Inference in Chemistry Teaching: a Model-Based Approach to the Integration of the Macro and Submicro Levels. Science & Education 30:5, pages 1289-1314.
Crossref
Crossref
José Manuel Do Carmo. (2021) Ideas de los alumnos sobre cambios de estado del agua y su evolución con una formación docente. Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica 5:1, pages 87-99.
Crossref
Crossref
Georgia Iatraki, Michael Delimitros, Ioannis Vrellis & Tassos A. Mikropoulos. (2021) Augmented and virtual environments for students with intellectual disability: design issues in Science Education. Augmented and virtual environments for students with intellectual disability: design issues in Science Education.
Alison Haas, Scott E. Grapin, Daniel Wendel, Lorena Llosa & Okhee Lee. (2020) How Fifth-Grade English Learners Engage in Systems Thinking Using Computational Models. Systems 8:4, pages 47.
Crossref
Crossref
Ayşegül Derman & Jazlin Ebenezer. (2018) The Effect of Multiple Representations of Physical and Chemical Changes on the Development of Primary Pre-service Teachers Cognitive Structures. Research in Science Education 50:4, pages 1575-1601.
Crossref
Crossref
Emily C. Miller, Samuel Severance & Joe Krajcik. 2020. Integrated Approaches to STEM Education. Integrated Approaches to STEM Education
185
204
.
Astrid Berg, Daniel Orraryd, Alma Jahic Pettersson & Magnus Hultén. (2019) Representational challenges in animated chemistry: self-generated animations as a means to encourage students’ reflections on sub-micro processes in laboratory exercises. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 20:4, pages 710-737.
Crossref
Crossref
Elon Langbeheim & Sharona T. Levy. (2019) Diving into the particle model: Examining the affordances of a single user participatory simulation. Computers & Education 139, pages 65-80.
Crossref
Crossref
Camillia Matuk & Marcia C. Linn. (2018) Why and how do middle school students exchange ideas during science inquiry?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 13:3, pages 263-299.
Crossref
Crossref
David W. Pollock, Giovanna T. Truong, Jessica L. Bonjour & John A. Frost. (2018) Solubility from the Femtoscale to the Macroscale. Journal of Chemical Education 95:6, pages 962-969.
Crossref
Crossref
Dimitrios Stamovlasis, George Papageorgiou, Georgios Tsitsipis, Themistoklis Tsikalas & Julie Vaiopoulou. (2018) Illustration of Step-Wise Latent Class Modeling With Covariates and Taxometric Analysis in Research Probing Children's Mental Models in Learning Sciences. Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Crossref
Crossref
Yang Yang, Peng He & Xiufeng Liu. (2017) Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Students’ Understanding of Interdisciplinary Science in Grades 4-8 over Multiple Semesters: a Rasch Measurement Study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16:4, pages 639-654.
Crossref
Crossref
Linda Morell, Tina Collier, Paul Black & Mark Wilson. (2017) A construct-modeling approach to develop a learning progression of how students understand the structure of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54:8, pages 1024-1048.
Crossref
Crossref
Arzu KİRMAN BİLGİN & Nevzat YİĞİT. (2017) Öğrencilerin “Maddenin Tanecikli Yapısı” Konusu ile Bağlamları İlişkilendirme Durumlarının İncelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, pages 303-303.
Crossref
Crossref
Víctor López & Roser Pintó. 2017. Crossing the Border of the Traditional Science Curriculum. Crossing the Border of the Traditional Science Curriculum
95
114
.
Patricia Schneeberger, Caroline Kaspar, Hervé Goix & Marcelle Goix. (2016) Enseigner la genèse des magmas sous une dorsale : exemple de la fusion partielle en classe de première scientifiqueTeaching of the genesis of magmas under a ridge: example of the partial fusion in scientific 11th grade of high school. RDST:14, pages 95-124.
Crossref
Crossref
Hui Jin, Hayat Hokayem, Sasha Wang & Xin Wei. (2015) A US-China Interview Study: Biology Students’ Argumentation and Explanation About Energy Consumption Issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14:6, pages 1037-1057.
Crossref
Crossref
Jan Christoph Hadenfeldt, Knut Neumann, Sascha Bernholt, Xiufeng Liu & Ilka Parchmann. (2016) Students’ progression in understanding the matter concept. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53:5, pages 683-708.
Crossref
Crossref
C. Zephrinus, Njoku, Mrs. I. Phoebe & Eze-odurukwe. (2015) Resolving Nigerian Secondary School Students’ Learning Difficulties in Nuclear Chemistry Using Computer Animation Solutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 176, pages 1034-1040.
Crossref
Crossref
Elon Langbeheim. (2015) Reinterpretation of students' ideas when reasoning about particle model illustrations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16:3, pages 697-700.
Crossref
Crossref
Kathleen M. Hill & Julie A. Luft. 2015. Newly Hired Teachers of Science. Newly Hired Teachers of Science
57
74
.
Jan Christoph Hadenfeldt, Björn Repenning & Knut Neumann. (2014) Die kognitive Validität von Ordered Multiple Choice Aufgaben zur Erfassung des Verständnisses von MaterieThe Cognitive Validity of Ordered Multiple Choice Items to Assess Students’ Understanding of Matter. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 20:1, pages 57-68.
Crossref
Crossref
Emine Adadan. (2014) Investigating the influence of pre-service chemistry teachers' understanding of the particle nature of matter on their conceptual understanding of solution chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15:2, pages 219-238.
Crossref
Crossref
Lei Liu, Aaron Rogat & Maria Bertling. (2014)
A
CBAL
™ SCIENCE MODEL OF COGNITION: DEVELOPING A COMPETENCY MODEL AND LEARNING PROGRESSIONS TO SUPPORT ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT
. ETS Research Report Series 2013:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Emine Adadan. (2012) Using Multiple Representations to Promote Grade 11 Students’ Scientific Understanding of the Particle Theory of Matter. Research in Science Education 43:3, pages 1079-1105.
Crossref
Crossref
Dimitrios Stamovlasis, George Papageorgiou & Georgios Tsitsipis. (2013) The coherent versus fragmented knowledge hypotheses for the structure of matter: an investigation with a robust statistical methodology. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14:4, pages 485-495.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith S. Taber. (2013) Revisiting the chemistry triplet: drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14:2, pages 156-168.
Crossref
Crossref
Tamás Turányi & Zoltán Tóth. (2013) Hungarian university students' misunderstandings in thermodynamics and chemical kinetics. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14:1, pages 105-116.
Crossref
Crossref
Jerry P. Suits & Niwat Srisawasdi. 2013. Pedagogic Roles of Animations and Simulations in Chemistry Courses. Pedagogic Roles of Animations and Simulations in Chemistry Courses
241
271
.
Mei-Hung Chiu & Shiao-Lan Chung. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
143
168
.
David F. Treagust, A. L. Chandrasegaran, Lilia Halim, Eng-Tek Ong, Ahmad Nurulazam Md Zain & Mageswary Karpudewan. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
125
141
.
Marianne Wiser, Kathryn E. Frazier & Victoria Fox. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
95
122
.
Hannah Sevian & Marilyne Stains. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
69
94
.
Philip Johnson. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
47
67
.
Georgios Tsaparlis & Hannah Sevian. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
485
520
.
Joi Merritt & Joseph Krajcik. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
11
45
.
Faik Ö. Karataş, Suat Ünal, Gregory Durland & George Bodner. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
231
247
.
Georgios Tsaparlis & Hannah Sevian. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
1
8
.
Carlos R. Espíndola & Osvaldo M. Cappannini. (2012) Obstáculos en la evaluación diagnóstica. Una propuesta de superación mediante la identificación de modelos presentes en el curso. Educación Química 23:4, pages 484-491.
Crossref
Crossref
이수덕, Seoung-Hey Paik & 민희정. (2012) The Analysis of Science Gifted Education Program Effects Related to Floating & Sinking Phenomena. Teacher Education Research 51:2, pages 153-168.
Crossref
Crossref
Georgios Tsitsipis, Dimitrios Stamovlasis & George Papageorgiou. (2011) A PROBABILISTIC MODEL FOR STUDENTS’ ERRORS AND MISCONCEPTIONS ON THE STRUCTURE OF MATTER IN RELATION TO THREE COGNITIVE VARIABLES. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10:4, pages 777-802.
Crossref
Crossref
L. Cardellini. (2012) Chemistry: Why the Subject is Difficult?. Educación Química 23, pages 305-310.
Crossref
Crossref
Takbir Ali. (2012) A Case Study of the Common Difficulties Experienced by High School Students in Chemistry Classroom in Gilgit-Baltistan (Pakistan). SAGE Open 2:2, pages 215824401244729.
Crossref
Crossref
Mehmet Aydeniz & Erin Leigh Kotowski. (2012) What Do Middle and High School Students Know About the Particulate Nature of Matter After Instruction? Implications for Practice. School Science and Mathematics 112:2, pages 59-65.
Crossref
Crossref
Dimitrios Stamovlasis, Georgios Tsitsipis & George Papageorgiou. (2012) Structural equation modeling in assessing students' understanding of the state changes of matter. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 13:3, pages 357-368.
Crossref
Crossref
Keily Heredia, Xiaoying Xu & Jennifer E. Lewis. (2012) The application and evaluation of a two-concept diagnostic instrument with students entering college general chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 13:1, pages 30-38.
Crossref
Crossref
Marianne Wiser, Carol L. Smith & Sue Doubler. 2012. Learning Progressions in Science. Learning Progressions in Science
359
403
.
Teresa MacDonald & Alice Bean. (2010) Adventures in the subatomic universe: An exploratory study of a scientist–museum physics education project. Public Understanding of Science 20:6, pages 846-862.
Crossref
Crossref
Philip Johnson & Peter Tymms. (2011) The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48:8, pages 849-877.
Crossref
Crossref
Eva Kellner, Annica Gullberg, Iiris Attorps, Ingvar Thorén & Roy Tärneberg. (2010) PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ INITIAL CONCEPTIONS ABOUT PUPILS’ DIFFICULTIES IN SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS: A POTENTIAL RESOURCE IN TEACHER EDUCATION. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9:4, pages 843-866.
Crossref
Crossref
Carrie A. Cloonan, Julie A. Andrew, Carolyn A. Nichol & John S. Hutchinson. (2011) A Simple System for Observing Dynamic Phase Equilibrium via an Inquiry-Based Laboratory or Demonstration. Journal of Chemical Education 88:7, pages 975-978.
Crossref
Crossref
Thomas Grüß‐Niehaus & Sascha Schanze. (2010) Eine kategoriegestützte Übersicht von Lernervorstellungen zum Löslichkeitsbegriff. CHEMKON 18:1, pages 19-26.
Crossref
Crossref
Emine Adadan, Kathy Cabe Trundle & Karen E. Irving. (2010) Exploring Grade 11 students' conceptual pathways of the particulate nature of matter in the context of multirepresentational instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47:8, pages 1004-1035.
Crossref
Crossref
David F. Treagust, A. L. Chandrasegaran, Julianne Crowley, Benny H. W. Yung, Irene P.-A. Cheong & Jazilah Othman. (2009) EVALUATING STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF KINETIC PARTICLE THEORY CONCEPTS RELATING TO THE STATES OF MATTER, CHANGES OF STATE AND DIFFUSION: A CROSS-NATIONAL STUDY. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 8:1, pages 141-164.
Crossref
Crossref
Philip Johnson & George Papageorgiou. (2009) Rethinking the introduction of particle theory: A substance‐based framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47:2, pages 130-150.
Crossref
Crossref
Luli Stern, Nitza Barnea & Sofia Shauli. (2008) The Effect of a Computerized Simulation on Middle School Students’ Understanding of the Kinetic Molecular Theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17:4, pages 305-315.
Crossref
Crossref
Hannah Margel, Bat‐Sheva Eylon & Zahava Scherz. (2007) A longitudinal study of junior high school students' conceptions of the structure of materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45:1, pages 132-152.
Crossref
Crossref
Russell Tytler, Vaughan Prain & Suzanne Peterson. (2007) Representational Issues in Students Learning About Evaporation. Research in Science Education 37:3, pages 313-331.
Crossref
Crossref
Tacettin PinarbaŞi;NurtaÇ Canpolat, Samih BayrakÇeken & Ömer Geban. (2006) An Investigation of Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Text-oriented Instruction on Students' Understanding of Solution Concepts. Research in Science Education 36:4, pages 313-335.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith S. Taber. (2006) Constructivism’s New Clothes: The Trivial, the Contingent, and a Progressive Research Programme into the Learning of Science. Foundations of Chemistry 8:2, pages 189-219.
Crossref
Crossref
Xiufeng Liu. (2006) Effects of Combined Hands-on Laboratory and Computer Modeling on Student Learning of Gas Laws: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Science Education and Technology 15:1, pages 89-100.
Crossref
Crossref
Xiufeng Liu,Kathleen Lesniak. (2006) Progression in children's understanding of the matter concept from elementary to high school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43:3, pages 320-347.
Crossref
Crossref
Vassilia Hatzinikita, Vasilios Koulaidis & Agapitos Hatzinikitas. (2005) Modeling Pupils' Understanding and Explanations Concerning Changes in Matter. Research in Science Education 35:4, pages 471-495.
Crossref
Crossref
Philip Johnson. (2005) The Development of Children’s Concept of a Substance: A Longitudinal Study of Interaction Between Curriculum and Learning. Research in Science Education 35:1, pages 41-61.
Crossref
Crossref
Muammer �al�k, Alipa?a Ayas & Jazlin V. Ebenezer. (2005) A Review of Solution Chemistry Studies: Insights into Students? Conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology 14:1, pages 29-50.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith S. Taber. (2005) Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education 89:1, pages 94-116.
Crossref
Crossref
Hsin‐Kai Wu & Priti Shah. (2004) Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education 88:3, pages 465-492.
Crossref
Crossref
Dilek Ardac & Sevil Akaygun. (2004) Effectiveness of multimedia‐based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41:4, pages 317-337.
Crossref
Crossref
Dirk Höltkemeier & Marco Oetken. (2003) Didaktische Überlegungen zur Implementierung diffusionsgesteuerter Wachstumsphänomene in den Chemieunterricht. CHEMKON 10:4, pages 187-193.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith S. Taber. (2003) Mediating mental models of metals: Acknowledging the priority of the learner's prior learning. Science Education 87:5, pages 732-758.
Crossref
Crossref
Jonathan E. Singer, Revital Tali Tal & Hsin-Kai Wu. (2003) Students' Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter. School Science and Mathematics 103:1, pages 28-44.
Crossref
Crossref
Allan G Harrison & David F Treagust. 2003. Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice. Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice
189
212
.
Jazlin V. Ebenezer & Duncan M. Fraser. (2001) First year chemical engineering students' conceptions of energy in solution processes: Phenomenographic categories for common knowledge construction. Science Education 85:5, pages 509-535.
Crossref
Crossref
Martina Nieswandt. (2001) Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective. Science Education 85:2, pages 158-179.
Crossref
Crossref
Peter Buck, Philip Johnson, Helmut Fischler, Jochen Peuckert & Silke Seifert. 2001. Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future. Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future
225
234
.
Nicholas J. Selley. (2000) Students' spontaneous use of a particulate model for dissolution. Research in Science Education 30:4, pages 389-402.
Crossref
Crossref