4,156
Views
49
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods study

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (17)

Michael Loncar, Wayne Schams & Jong-Shing Liang. (2023) Multiple technologies, multiple sources: trends and analyses of the literature on technology-mediated feedback for L2 English writing published from 2015-2019. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:4, pages 722-784.
Read now
Chen-Chen Liu, Yu Guo, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Yun-Fang Tu & Zhiqiang Wang. (2023) Effects of an article-structure strategy-based spherical video-based virtual reality approach on EFL learners’ English reading comprehension and learning conceptions. Interactive Learning Environments 0:0, pages 1-18.
Read now
Ha Thi Phuong Pham. (2022) Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: student feedback and revision in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 35:9, pages 2112-2147.
Read now
Jalil Fathi & Masoud Rahimi. (2022) Examining the impact of flipped classroom on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: a case of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning 35:7, pages 1668-1706.
Read now
Jalil Fathi & Masoud Rahimi. (2022) Electronic writing portfolio in a collaborative writing environment: its impact on EFL students’ writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning 0:0, pages 1-39.
Read now
Shu-Chiao Tsai. (2022) Chinese students’ perceptions of using Google Translate as a translingual CALL tool in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 35:5-6, pages 1250-1272.
Read now
Diem Thi Ngoc Hoang & Thinh Hoang. (2022) Enhancing EFL students’ academic writing skills in online learning via Google Docs-based collaboration: a mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning 0:0, pages 1-23.
Read now
Murad Abdu Saeed & Huda Suleiman Al Qunayeer. (2022) Exploring teacher interactive e-feedback on students’ writing through Google Docs: factors promoting interactivity and potential for learning. The Language Learning Journal 50:3, pages 360-377.
Read now
Akbar Bahari & Leila Gholami. (2022) Challenges and affordances of reading and writing development in technology-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments 0:0, pages 1-25.
Read now
Alexandra Zakharova, Katerina Evers & Sufen Chen. (2022) Optimal scaffolding method for resume writing in the supplementary online writing course. Interactive Learning Environments 0:0, pages 1-15.
Read now
Mohammed Abdullah Alharbi. (2020) Exploring the potential of Google Doc in facilitating innovative teaching and learning practices in an EFL writing course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 14:3, pages 227-242.
Read now
You Su, Yanyan Li, Jyh-Chong Liang & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2019) Moving literature circles into wiki-based environment: the role of online self-regulation in EFL learners’ attitude toward collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 32:5-6, pages 556-586.
Read now
Saman Ebadi & Masoud Rahimi. (2019) Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning 32:5-6, pages 527-555.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (32)

Muneera Muftah, Fatima Abdullah Yahya Al-Inbari, Baleigh Qassim Al-Wasy & Hassan Saleh Mahdi. (2023) The Role of Automated Corrective Feedback in Improving EFL Learners' Mastery of the Writing Aspects. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS 34:2, pages 82-109.
Crossref
Kuok Wa Chao Chao, Maria-Lourdes Lira-Gonzales & Joanie David. (2023) Technologies in English as a Second/Foreign Language Writing Classes. Folios:58.
Crossref
Yan Li. (2023) The effect of online collaborative writing instruction on enhancing writing performance, writing motivation, and writing self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology 14.
Crossref
Fatima Abdullah Yahya Al-Inbari & Baleigh Qassim Mohammed Al-Wasy. (2022) The impact of automated writing evaluation (AWE) on EFL learners’ peer and self-editing. Education and Information Technologies 28:6, pages 6645-6665.
Crossref
Chen-Chen Liu, Shi-Jie Liu, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Yun-Fang Tu, Youmei Wang & Naini Wang. (2023) Engaging EFL students’ critical thinking tendency and in-depth reflection in technology-based writing contexts: A peer assessment-incorporated automatic evaluation approach. Education and Information Technologies.
Crossref
Helaluddin*, Nurhayati & Nurhayati Nyayu. (2023) The Use of Collaborative Strategies to Improve Students' Writing Ability and Self-Efficacy: A Mixed Method Study. European Journal of Educational Research 12:1, pages 265-280.
Crossref
Jia Li, Lillian Mak, Bill Hunter & Todd Cunningham. (2022) Structured instructional design for integrated language skill development: College students’ perspectives on collaborative reading-to-write activities using a cloud-based tool. Language Teaching Research, pages 136216882211422.
Crossref
Gi‐Zen Liu, Masoud Rahimi & Jalil Fathi. (2022) Flipping writing metacognitive strategies and writing skills in an English as a foreign language collaborative writing context: a mixed‐methods study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38:6, pages 1730-1751.
Crossref
Siyi Cao, Siruo Zhou, Yong Luo, Tao Wang, Tongquan Zhou & Yizhong Xu. (2022) A review of the ESL/EFL learners’ gains from online peer feedback on English writing. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Azlin Zaiti Zainal & Ma Fei Fan. (2022) ESL Learners' Processes and Perceptions of Using Google Docs in Collaborative Academic Writing. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 12:4, pages 1-23.
Crossref
Pooneh Kazemi, Natasha Pourdana, Gholamhassan Famil Khalili & Payam Nour. (2022) Microgenetic analysis of written languaging attributes on form-focused and content-focused e-collaborative writing tasks in Google Docs. Education and Information Technologies 27:8, pages 10681-10704.
Crossref
Irham*, Ismail, Ismail Tolla & Baso Baso. (2022) Development of the 4C Teaching Model to Improve Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Educational Methodology 8:3, pages 493-504.
Crossref
Aasia Nusrat, Sardaraz Khan, Farah Kashif & Rakhshanda Fawad. (2022) Effect of teachers’ asynchronous e-feedback and synchronous oral feedback on English language learners’ writing accuracy. Frontiers in Education 7.
Crossref
Han Zhang, Galina Shulgina, Mik Fanguy & Jamie Costley. (2022) Online peer editing: effects of comments and edits on academic writing skills. Heliyon 8:7, pages e09822.
Crossref
Xiao Lei, Jalil Fathi, Shabnam Noorbakhsh & Masoud Rahimi. (2022) The Impact of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning on English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Vocabulary Learning Attitudes and Self-Regulatory Capacity. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Mohammadreza VALİZADEH. (2022) Language teachers’ perceptions of using Google keyboard in L2 writing. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning 5:2, pages 411-421.
Crossref
Sharon Jia Chian Lee & Siti Nazleen Abdul Rabu. (2021) Google docs for higher education: Evaluating online interaction and reflective writing using content analysis approach. Education and Information Technologies 27:3, pages 3651-3681.
Crossref
Judit García-Martín, Carmen Álvarez-Álvarez & Sheila García-Martín. (2022) Una revisión sistemática de intervenciones en línea sobre escritura. Campus Virtuales 11:1, pages 9.
Crossref
Fatemeh Samiei & Saman Ebadi. (2021) Exploring EFL learners’ inferential reading comprehension skills through a flipped classroom. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 16:1.
Crossref
Murad Abdu Saeed Mohammed & Musheer Abdulwahid AL-Jaberi. (2021) Google Docs or Microsoft Word? Master's students' engagement with instructor written feedback on academic writing in a cross-cultural setting. Computers and Composition 62, pages 102672.
Crossref
Kam Leung Yeung, Shana K. Carpenter & Daniel Corral. (2021) A Comprehensive Review of Educational Technology on Objective Learning Outcomes in Academic Contexts. Educational Psychology Review 33:4, pages 1583-1630.
Crossref
Wu-Yuin Hwang, Rio Nurtantyana & Juli Hildayati. (2021) Investigation of students' understanding of speech with smart mechanisms and scaffolding in flipped classrooms. Investigation of students' understanding of speech with smart mechanisms and scaffolding in flipped classrooms.
Jaemyong Chang & Mik Fanguy. (2021) Collab_doc_maker: An Automatic Google-Doc-making Tool. Collab_doc_maker: An Automatic Google-Doc-making Tool.
I Komang Janu Prianda Putra, Ni Nyoman Padma Dewi & Ni Kadek Sintya Dewi. (2021) Self-Editing Activities Improve Recount Text Writing Skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru 4:1, pages 138-143.
Crossref
Eunjeong PARK, Youngjoo Yİ & Jinsil JANG. (2021) Mixed methods research in second language writing: A systematic research synthesis. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 17:1, pages 570-579.
Crossref
Saman Ebadi & Saba Bashir. (2020) An exploration into EFL learners’ writing skills via mobile-based dynamic assessment. Education and Information Technologies 26:2, pages 1995-2016.
Crossref
Alice Shu-Ju Lee & Wing Yee Jenifer Ho. 2021. Language Learning with Technology. Language Learning with Technology 123 132 .
Daniela Popa, Angela Repanovici, Daciana Lupu, Mariana Norel & Claudiu Coman. (2020) Using Mixed Methods to Understand Teaching and Learning in COVID 19 Times. Sustainability 12:20, pages 8726.
Crossref
Mogens Olesen. (2020) Cooperative Collaboration in the Hybrid Space of Google Docs Based Group Work. Education Sciences 10:10, pages 269.
Crossref
Rustam Shadiev & Mengke Yang. (2020) Review of Studies on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning and Teaching. Sustainability 12:2, pages 524.
Crossref
Adrian Ting. 2020. Enhancing Learning Design for Innovative Teaching in Higher Education. Enhancing Learning Design for Innovative Teaching in Higher Education 237 265 .
Hatime Çiftçi & Erhan Aslan. (2019) Computer-Mediated Communication in the L2 Writing Process. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 9:2, pages 19-36.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.