Citations (69)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (27)
Mo Li, Shulin Yu, Pauline Mak & Chunhong Liu. (2023) Exploring the efficacy of peer assessment in university translation classrooms. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:4, pages 585-609.
Read now
Read now
Xiuyan Guo, Jin Liu, Hengtao Tang, Ruiqin Gao, Qu Chen, Terry Wolfer & Aisha Haynes. (2023) Development and validation of the peer assessment motivation scale (PAMS) in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 48:8, pages 1243-1257.
Read now
Read now
Eva-Lena Forslind, Stefan Hrastinski & Ingrid Forsler. (2023) Digital peer feedback on visual ideas: a study of eighth-grade students in visual art. Interactive Learning Environments 0:0, pages 1-18.
Read now
Read now
C. Hannigan, D. Alonzo & C. Z. Oo. (2022) Student assessment literacy: indicators and domains from the literature. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 29:4, pages 482-504.
Read now
Read now
Reza Ahmadi. (2022) Students’ perceptions of student voice in assessment within the context of Iran: the dynamics of culture, power relations, and student knowledge. Higher Education Research & Development 41:2, pages 211-225.
Read now
Read now
Marlies Schillings, Herma Roebertsen, Hans Savelberg, Anne van Dijk & Diana Dolmans. (2021) Improving the understanding of written peer feedback through face-to-face peer dialogue: students’ perspective. Higher Education Research & Development 40:5, pages 1100-1116.
Read now
Read now
Krishneel Reddy, Tony Harland, Rob Wass & Nave Wald. (2021) Student peer review as a process of knowledge creation through dialogue. Higher Education Research & Development 40:4, pages 825-837.
Read now
Read now
Marlies Schillings, H. Roebertsen, H. Savelberg, J. Whittingham & D. Dolmans. (2020) Peer-to-peer dialogue about teachers’ written feedback enhances students’ understanding on how to improve writing skills. Educational Studies 46:6, pages 693-707.
Read now
Read now
Frank J. Dirrigl$suffix/text()$suffix/text() & Mark Noe. (2019) The teacher writing toolkit: enhancing undergraduate teaching of scientific writing in the biological sciences. Journal of Biological Education 53:5, pages 524-540.
Read now
Read now
Bart Huisman, Nadira Saab, Jan van Driel & Paul van den Broek. (2018) Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:6, pages 955-968.
Read now
Read now
Xiongyi Liu, Lan Li & Zhihong Zhang. (2018) Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:2, pages 207-222.
Read now
Read now
Bart Huisman, Nadira Saab, Jan van Driel & Paul van den Broek. (2017) Peer feedback on college students’ writing: exploring the relation between students’ ability match, feedback quality and essay performance. Higher Education Research & Development 36:7, pages 1433-1447.
Read now
Read now
Giulia Ortoleva & Mireille Bétrancourt. (2016) Supporting productive collaboration in a computer-supported instructional activity: peer-feedback on critical incidents in health care education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training 68:2, pages 178-197.
Read now
Read now
Emma Medland. (2016) Assessment in higher education: drivers, barriers and directions for change in the UK. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:1, pages 81-96.
Read now
Read now
Scott Ashton & Randall S. Davies. (2015) Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing course. Distance Education 36:3, pages 312-334.
Read now
Read now
Yu-Fen Yang. (2014) Preparing language teachers for blended teaching of summary writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 27:3, pages 185-206.
Read now
Read now
Ana Carvalho. (2013) Students' perceptions of fairness in peer assessment: evidence from a problem-based learning course. Teaching in Higher Education 18:5, pages 491-505.
Read now
Read now
Oxana Poverjuc, Val Brooks & David Wray. (2012) Using peer feedback in a Master's programme: a multiple case study. Teaching in Higher Education 17:4, pages 465-477.
Read now
Read now
Michael
T. Buchanan & Julian Stern. (2012) Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the benefits of peer review. Journal of Education for Teaching 38:1, pages 37-49.
Read now
Read now
MichaelT. Buchanan. (2011) Peer Reviewing Preservice Teachers of Christian Higher Education. Christian Higher Education 10:5, pages 464-481.
Read now
Read now
Sarah Gielen, Filip Dochy & Patrick Onghena. (2011) An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36:2, pages 137-155.
Read now
Read now
Lúcia Pombo, Maria
João Loureiro & António Moreira. (2010) Assessing collaborative work in a higher education blended learning context: strategies and students’ perceptions. Educational Media International 47:3, pages 217-229.
Read now
Read now
Patricia Cartney. (2010) Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35:5, pages 551-564.
Read now
Read now
D. Royce Sadler. (2010) Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35:5, pages 535-550.
Read now
Read now
Tim McMahon. (2010) Peer feedback in an undergraduate programme: using action research to overcome students' reluctance to criticise. Educational Action Research 18:2, pages 273-287.
Read now
Read now
Gary Cheng & Juliana Chau. (2009) Digital video for fostering self‐reflection in an ePortfolio environment. Learning, Media and Technology 34:4, pages 337-350.
Read now
Read now
Ali Al-Barakat & Omayya Al-Hassan. (2009) Peer assessment as a learning tool for enhancing student teachers' preparation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 37:4, pages 399-413.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (42)
Hichem Souissi, Mohamed Abdelkader Souissi, Omar Trabelsi, Anis Ben Chikha, Adnene Gharbi & Nizar Souissi. (2022) Peer-to-peer online video feedback with pedagogical activity improves the snatch learning during the COVID-19-induced confinement in young weightlifting athletes. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 18:6, pages 2151-2159.
Crossref
Crossref
Marlies Schillings, Herma Roebertsen, Hans Savelberg & Diana Dolmans. (2018) A review of educational dialogue strategies to improve academic writing skills. Active Learning in Higher Education 24:2, pages 95-108.
Crossref
Crossref
Zach Thompson, Hyunsun Yoon & Paul Booth. (2023) Dispersed assessment: A novel approach to enhancing student engagement during and beyond Covid-19. The International Journal of Management Education 21:2, pages 100811.
Crossref
Crossref
Evrim Erbilgin, Jennifer M. Robinson, Adeeb M. Jarrah, Jason D. Johnson & Serigne M. Gningue. (2023) Exploring the Type and Quality of Peer Feedback in a Graduate-Level Blended Course. Education Sciences 13:6, pages 548.
Crossref
Crossref
Sophie Cuocci, Padideh Fattahi Marnani, Iram Khan & Shayla Roberts. (2023) A Meta-Synthesis of Technology-Supported Peer Feedback in ESL/EFL Writing Classes Research: A Replication of Chen’s Study. Languages 8:2, pages 114.
Crossref
Crossref
Gunilla Öberg, Alice Campbell, Joanne Fox, Marcia Graves, Tara Ivanochko, Linda Matsuchi, Isobel Mouat & Ashley Welsh. (2021) Teaching Science as a Process, Not a Set of Facts. Science & Education 31:3, pages 787-817.
Crossref
Crossref
Han Zhang, Ashleigh Southam, Mik Fanguy & Jamie Costley. (2021) Understanding how embedded peer comments affect student quiz scores, academic writing and lecture note-taking accuracy. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 19:2, pages 222-235.
Crossref
Crossref
Junfei Li, Jinyan Huang & Shuang Cheng. (2022) The reliability, effectiveness, and benefits of peer assessment in college EFL speaking classrooms: Student and teacher perspectives. Studies in Educational Evaluation 72, pages 101120.
Crossref
Crossref
Tamilla MammadovaTamilla Mammadova. 2022. Academic Writing and Information Literacy Instruction in Digital Environments. Academic Writing and Information Literacy Instruction in Digital Environments
143
171
.
Floris M. van Blankenstein, John F. O’Sullivan, Nadira Saab & Paul Steendijk. (2021) The effect of peer modelling and discussing modelled feedback principles on medical students’ feedback skills: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Education 21:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Catherine Nguoi Chui Lam & Hadina Habil. (2021) Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Peer Feedback in Teaching and Learning. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 29:3.
Crossref
Crossref
Qi Lu, Xinhua Zhu & Choo Mui Cheong. (2021) Understanding the Difference Between Self-Feedback and Peer Feedback: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Undergraduate Students' Writing Improvement. Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Crossref
Crossref
Sonja BJELOBABA. (2021) Deterring cheating using a complex assessment design: A case study. The Literacy Trek 7:1, pages 55-77.
Crossref
Crossref
Anton A Kiss & Colin Webb. (2021) The Manchester perspective on using the Design Project to enhance the education of chemical engineering students. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 96:6, pages 1453-1464.
Crossref
Crossref
Işıl Günseli Kaçar. 2021. Design Solutions for Adaptive Hypermedia Listening Software. Design Solutions for Adaptive Hypermedia Listening Software
124
163
.
Kathryn Haughney, Shawnee Wakeman & Laura Hart. (2020) Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature. Education Sciences 10:3, pages 60.
Crossref
Crossref
Li Hongxia, Zhao Chengling, Jiang Zhihui, Zhao Gang & Zhu Wenjuan. (2020) Improving Online Peer Assessment Engagement. Improving Online Peer Assessment Engagement.
Pierpaolo Limone & Giusi Antonia Toto. 2020. Examining the Roles of Teachers and Students in Mastering New Technologies. Examining the Roles of Teachers and Students in Mastering New Technologies
1
26
.
Xiongyi Liu, Lan Li & Patrick Wachira. 2020. Handbook of Research on Literacy and Digital Technology Integration in Teacher Education. Handbook of Research on Literacy and Digital Technology Integration in Teacher Education
245
260
.
Chin Fei Goh, Owee Kowang Tan, Amran Rasli & Sang Long Choi. (2019) Engagement in peer review, learner-content interaction and learning outcomes. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 36:5, pages 423-433.
Crossref
Crossref
Nagihan BOZTUNÇ ÖZTÜRK, Melek Gülşah ŞAHİN & Mustafa İLHAN. (2019) An analysis of scoring via analytic rubric and general impression in peer assessmentAkran değerlendirmede analitik rubrikle ve genel izlenimle yapılan puanlamaların incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Education 8:4, pages 258-275.
Crossref
Crossref
Floris M. van Blankenstein, Gabriela-Olivia Truțescu, Roeland M. van der Rijst & Nadira Saab. (2019) Immediate and delayed effects of a modeling example on the application of principles of good feedback practice: a quasi-experimental study. Instructional Science 47:3, pages 299-318.
Crossref
Crossref
Shanna R. Daly, Erika A. Mosyjowski & Colleen M. Seifert. (2016) Teaching Creative Process across Disciplines. The Journal of Creative Behavior 53:1, pages 5-17.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra Bonney & Sharon Pettit. (2019) Which types of feedback do CBT students in training value most?. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist 12.
Crossref
Crossref
Andrea N. Giordano, Michael Walzak & Kristina M. Lantzky. 2018. Engaging Students in Physical Chemistry. Engaging Students in Physical Chemistry
73
81
.
Julia Boser, Sonja Scherer, Kathrin Kuchta, S. Franziska C. Wenzel & Holger Horz. (2016) Empirically Founded Teaching in Psychology – An Example for the Combination of Evidence-based Teaching and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Psychology Learning & Teaching 16:2, pages 261-275.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Martos-Garcia, Oidui Usabiaga & Alexandra Valencia-Peris. (2017) Students’ Perception on Formative and Shared Assessment: Connecting two Universities through the Blogosphere. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 6:1, pages 64-70.
Crossref
Crossref
Diego Fernando Ubaque Casallas & Freddy Samir Pinilla Castellanos. (2016) Argumentation Skills: A Peer Assessment Approach to Discussions in the EFL Classroom. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development 18:2, pages 111.
Crossref
Crossref
Caroline Moraes, Nina Michaelidou & Louise Canning. (2016) Students' Attitudes toward a Group Coursework Protocol and Peer Assessment System. Industry and Higher Education 30:2, pages 117-128.
Crossref
Crossref
Yasemin Demiraslan Çevik, Tülin Haşlaman & Serkan Çelik. (2015) The effect of peer assessment on problem solving skills of prospective teachers supported by online learning activities. Studies in Educational Evaluation 44, pages 23-35.
Crossref
Crossref
Trinh Quoc Lap & Cao Hoang Yen. (2013) Vietnamese Learners' Ability To Write English Argumentative Paragraphs: The Role Of Peer Feedback Giving. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 3:4, pages 12-20.
Crossref
Crossref
Olliver McGarr & Amanda Marie Clifford. (2012) ‘Just enough to make you take it seriously’: exploring students’ attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher Education 65:6, pages 677-693.
Crossref
Crossref
Alasdair Blair, Steven Curtis & Sam Mcginty. (2012) Is Peer Feedback an Effective Approach for Creating Dialogue in Politics?. European Political Science 12:1, pages 102-115.
Crossref
Crossref
Swapna Kumar, Johanna Kenney & Vasa Buraphadeja. 2013. Cases on Online Learning Communities and Beyond. Cases on Online Learning Communities and Beyond
345
360
.
Gloria Yi‐Ming Kao. (2012) Enhancing the quality of peer review by reducing student “free riding”: Peer assessment with positive interdependence. British Journal of Educational Technology 44:1, pages 112-124.
Crossref
Crossref
CAROLYN THOMPSON MARTIN. (2012) Promoting Pedagogical Experimentation. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 30:12, pages 655-660.
Crossref
Crossref
Sue Timmis. (2012) Constant companions: Instant messaging conversations as sustainable supportive study structures amongst undergraduate peers. Computers & Education 59:1, pages 3-18.
Crossref
Crossref
Pierpaolo Limone. (2012) Peer Learning and Peer Assessment to Enhance Participation in Online Courses. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence 3:3, pages 27-47.
Crossref
Crossref
Lúcia Pombo & Mário Talaia. (2012) EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE TEACHING AND LEARNING STRATEGIES IN SCIENCE EDUCATION: COLLABORATIVE WORK AND PEER ASSESSMENT. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 43:1, pages 86-94.
Crossref
Crossref
Carole Chen, Kat Leung & Gordon Maxwell. 2011. Enhancing Learning Through Technology. Education Unplugged: Mobile Technologies and Web 2.0. Enhancing Learning Through Technology. Education Unplugged: Mobile Technologies and Web 2.0
177
185
.
Kat Leung, Manhoe Chan, Gordon Maxwell & Teresa Poon. 2010. Hybrid Learning. Hybrid Learning
149
159
.
J. van der Pol, B.A.M. van den Berg, W.F. Admiraal & P.R.J. Simons. (2008) The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education 51:4, pages 1804-1817.
Crossref
Crossref