Advanced search
Publication Cover
Australasian Philosophical Review Volume 3, 2019 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
176
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

First Chop Your Logos … : Socrates and the Sophists on Language, Logic and Development

Mary Margaret McCabeKing’s College LondonCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 131-150 | Received 15 Aug 2015, Published online: 22 Jan 2021

Citations (11)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (9)

Mary Margaret McCabe. (2019) Who’s Who and What’s What? A Response to Commentators on ‘First Chop Your Logos … ’. Australasian Philosophical Review 3:2, pages 214-238.
Read now
Tony Leyh. (2019) Isocrates’ Pragmatic Reflective Life at Euthydemus 304d–306e. Australasian Philosophical Review 3:2, pages 206-213.
Read now
Matthew Duncombe. (2019) Fine-grained and Coarse-grained Knowledge in Euthydemus 293b7–d1. Australasian Philosophical Review 3:2, pages 198-205.
Read now
Christine J. Thomas. (2019) ‘Learning’ and Learning at Euthydemus 275d–278d. Australasian Philosophical Review 3:2, pages 191-197.
Read now
Saloni de Souza & Daniel Vázquez. (2019) Teleology and Sophistic Endeavour in the Euthydemus. Australasian Philosophical Review 3:2, pages 183-190.
Read now
Russell E. Jones & Ravi Sharma. (2019) Eristic Combat at Euthydemus 285e–286b. Australasian Philosophical Review 3:2, pages 167-175.
Read now
Nils Kürbis. (2019) The Importance of Being Erroneous. Australasian Philosophical Review 3:2, pages 155-166.
Read now
Nicholas Denyer. (2019) Some Aspects of Aspect: Reflections on M.M. McCabe’s ‘First Chop Your Logos: Socrates and the Sophists on Language, Logic and Development’. Australasian Philosophical Review 3:2, pages 151-154.
Read now
Fiona Leigh. (2019) Says Who? Modes of Speaking in the Euthydemus. Australasian Philosophical Review 3:2, pages 123-130.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (2)

Nils Kürbis. (2019) An Argument for Minimal Logic. Dialectica 73:1-2, pages 31-63.
Crossref
Nils Kürbis. (2019) Is incompatibilism compatible with Fregeanism?. European journal of analytic philosophy 14:2, pages 27-46.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.