Advanced search
Publication Cover
Expert Review of Medical Devices Volume 10, 2013 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
222
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Public preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests: a review of conjoint analysis studies

Alex Ghanouni Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
,
Samuel G Smith Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
,
Steve Halligan Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
,
Andrew Plumb Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
,
Darren Boone Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
,
Guiqing Lily Yao Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
,
Shihua Zhu Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
,
Richard Lilford Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
,
Jane Wardle Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
&
Christian von Wagner Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. [email protected]; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. [email protected]
 show all
Pages 489-499 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

Citations (28)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (3)

Samuel J Lee, Meghan C O’Leary, Karl E Umble & Stephanie B Wheeler. (2018) Eliciting vulnerable patients’ preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Patient Preference and Adherence 12, pages 2267-2282.
Read now
Lauren Brown, Ting-hsuan Lee, Manuela De Allegri, Krishna Rao & John FP. Bridges. (2017) Applying stated-preference methods to improve health systems in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 17:5, pages 441-458.
Read now
Susan H Boklage, Allen W Mangel, Varun Ramamohan, Deirdre Mladsi & Tao Wang. (2016) Impact of patient adherence on the cost-effectiveness of noninvasive tests for the initial diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in the United States. Patient Preference and Adherence 10, pages 45-55.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (25)

Michelle J Allen, Rachael Doran, David Brain, Elizabeth E Powell, James O’Beirne, Patricia C Valery, Adrian Barnett, Ruvini Hettiarachchi, Ingrid J Hickman & Sanjeewa Kularatna. (2023) A discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for a liver screening programme in Queensland, Australia: a mixed methods study to select attributes and levels. BMC Health Services Research 23:1.
Crossref
Leonie Diedrich, Melanie Brinkmann, Maren Dreier, Siegbert Rossol, Wendelin Schramm & Christian Krauth. (2023) Is there a place for sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening? A systematic review and critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness models. PLOS ONE 18:8, pages e0290353.
Crossref
Melanie Brinkmann, Leonie Diedrich, Melissa Hemmerling, Christian Krauth, Bernt-Peter Robra, Jona T. Stahmeyer & Maren Dreier. (2023) Heterogeneous Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Germany: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment. Value in Health 26:1, pages 104-114.
Crossref
Melanie Brinkmann, Lara Marleen Fricke, Leonie Diedrich, Bernt-Peter Robra, Christian Krauth & Maren Dreier. (2022) Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review. Health Economics Review 12:1.
Crossref
David Brain, Amarzaya Jadambaa & Sanjeewa Kularatna. (2022) Methodology to derive preference for health screening programmes using discrete choice experiments: a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research 22:1.
Crossref
Rebekah Hall, Antonieta Medina-Lara, Willie Hamilton & Anne E. Spencer. (2021) Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 15:3, pages 269-285.
Crossref
Soudabeh Fazeli, Yesenia Covarrubias, Shirin Bassirian, Jordan Cuevas, Kathryn Fowler, Irine Vodkin, Yuko Kono, Robert Marks, Rohit Loomba, Bachir Taouli, Claude Sirlin & Ruth Carlos. (2022) Eliciting Patient Preferences for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis. Journal of the American College of Radiology 19:4, pages 502-512.
Crossref
Basem Al-Omari, Joviana Farhat & Mai Ershaid. (2022) Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients’ Preferences and Personalize Care. Journal of Personalized Medicine 12:2, pages 274.
Crossref
Leonie Diedrich, Melanie Brinkmann, Maren Dreier, Wendelin Schramm & Christian Krauth. (2022) Additional offer of sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening in Germany: rationale and protocol of the decision-analytic modelling approach in the SIGMO study. BMJ Open 12:1, pages e050698.
Crossref
Zixuan Zhao, Lingbin Du, Le Wang, Youqing Wang, Yi Yang & Hengjin Dong. (2021) Preferred Lung Cancer Screening Modalities in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Cancers 13:23, pages 6110.
Crossref
Travis Hyams, Bruce Golden, John Sammarco, Shahnaz Sultan, Evelyn King-Marshall, Min Qi Wang & Barbara Curbow. (2021) Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. BMC Health Services Research 21:1.
Crossref
Thuy Ngan Tran, Allegra Ferrari, Sarah Hoeck, Marc Peeters & Guido Van Hal. (2021) Colorectal Cancer Screening: Have We Addressed Concerns and Needs of the Target Population?. Gastrointestinal Disorders 3:4, pages 173-203.
Crossref
Bernt-Peter Robra. 2021. Ethical Challenges in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. Ethical Challenges in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy 85 104 .
Ethna McFerran, Marco Boeri & Frank Kee. (2020) Patient Preferences in Surveillance: Findings From a Discrete Choice Experiment in the “My Follow-Up” Study. Value in Health 23:10, pages 1373-1383.
Crossref
George Dimas, Federico Bianchi, Dimitris K Iakovidis, Alexandros Karargyris, Gastone Ciuti & Anastasios Koulaouzidis. (2020) Endoscopic single-image size measurements. Measurement Science and Technology 31:7, pages 074010.
Crossref
Christian von Wagner, Wouter Verstraete, Yasemin Hirst, Brian D Nicholson, Sandro T Stoffel & Helga Laszlo. (2020) Public preferences for using quantitative faecal immunochemical test versus colonoscopy as diagnostic test for colorectal cancer: evidence from an online survey. BJGP Open 4:1, pages bjgpopen20X101007.
Crossref
Carol Mansfield, Donatus U. Ekwueme, Florence K. L. Tangka, Derek S. Brown, Judith Lee Smith, Gery P. Guy, Chunyu Li & Brett Hauber. (2018) Colorectal Cancer Screening: Preferences, Past Behavior, and Future Intentions. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 11:6, pages 599-611.
Crossref
Henk Broekhuizen, Catharina G.M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Harry J.M. Groen & Maarten J. IJzerman. (2018) Assessing Lung Cancer Screening Programs under Uncertainty in a Heterogeneous Population. Value in Health 21:11, pages 1269-1277.
Crossref
Valérie L. Almli & Tormod Næs. 2018. Methods in Consumer Research, Volume 1. Methods in Consumer Research, Volume 1 485 529 .
Kaisa Fritzell, Kerstin Stake Nilsson, Anna Jervaeus, Rolf Hultcrantz & Yvonne Wengström. (2017) The importance of people's values and preferences for colorectal cancer screening participation. European Journal of Public Health 27:6, pages 1079-1084.
Crossref
Henk Broekhuizen, Catharina G.M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Harry Groen & Maarten J. IJzerman. (2017) Public Preferences for Lung Cancer Screening Policies. Value in Health 20:7, pages 961-968.
Crossref
Carol Mansfield, Florence K. L. Tangka, Donatus U. Ekwueme, Judith Lee Smith, Gery P. GuyJrJr, Chunyu Li & A. Brett Hauber. (2016) Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990?2013. Preventing Chronic Disease 13.
Crossref
Sally Wortley, Kathy Flitcroft & Kirsten Howard. (2015) WHAT IS THE ROLE OF COMMUNITY PREFERENCE INFORMATION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT DECISION MAKING? A CASE STUDY OF COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 31:4, pages 241-248.
Crossref
S. Wortley, G. Wong, A. Kieu & K. Howard. (2014) Assessing Stated Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Critical Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 7:3, pages 271-282.
Crossref
Miwako Tsunematsu, Hiromi Kawasaki, Yuko Masuoka & Masayuki Kakehashi. (2013) Factors Affecting Breast Cancer Screening Behavior in Japan - Assessment using the Health Belief Model and Conjoint Analysis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 14:10, pages 6041-6048.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.