553
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Differential prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) by gender and substance used in individuals with cannabis, cocaine, opioid, and tobacco use disorders

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 190-198 | Received 23 Aug 2022, Accepted 18 Jan 2023, Published online: 07 Mar 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) show a graded association with the development of substance use disorders (SUDs) and engagement in risky substance use behaviors. Women are overrepresented among individuals with more severe childhood adversity (≥4 types of ACEs) and may be at particular risk for aberrant substance use.

Objectives: To assess the prevalence of ACEs among men and women with cannabis, opioid, cocaine, and tobacco use disorders.

Methods: Non-treatment-seeking individuals participating in clinical addiction research at a single site completed the ACE questionnaire and provided a detailed substance use history. Data were analyzed using proportional odds models and logistic regression.

Results: Most participants (424/565; 75%) reported at least one ACE, and more than one-quarter (156/565; 27%) reported severe childhood adversity. Relative to men (n = 283), women (n = 282) reported more ACEs (OR = 1.49; p = .01) and more experiences of emotional/physical abuse (OR = 1.52; p = .02), sexual abuse (OR = 4.08; p = .04), and neglect (OR = 2.30; p < .01). Participants in the cocaine (OR = 1.87; n = .01) and opioid (OR = 2.21; p = .01) use disorder, but not cannabis use disorder (OR = 1.46; p = .08), studies reported more severe adversity relative to the tobacco group. Relative to tobacco users, emotional/physical abuse (OR = 1.92; p = .02) and neglect (OR = 2.46; p = .01) scores were higher in cocaine users and household dysfunction scores were higher in opioid users (OR = 2.67; p = .01).

Conclusion: The prevalence of ACEs differs with respect to both participant gender and primary substance used. Novel SUD treatment strategies that incorporate ACEs may be uniquely beneficial in specific subpopulations of people with SUDs.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank laboratory staff and study participants for their involvement in this research.

Disclosure statement

KMG has provided consultation to Jazz Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors report no relevant disclosures.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse grants P50-DA016511 and U54-DA016511 (McRae-Clark, Brady, Neelon, Baker, and Ramakrishnan), K24-DA038240 (McRae-Clark), and F31-DA057051 (Martin).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 987.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.