836
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What’s in a word? On the use of metaphors to describe the careers of women academics

ORCID Icon
Pages 862-872 | Received 14 Mar 2018, Accepted 23 Sep 2018, Published online: 18 Oct 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Various metaphors are used in the literature and media to refer to the careers and experiences of women academics. In the wake of the fascinating debate in the literature surrounding the adequacy of these expressions, considerable effort has been devoted to the pursuit of ‘the ideal metaphor’: one that is comprehensible, inclusive, intersectional, empowering; acknowledges the agency of women and all social actors within the organisation; and meets a number of other high standards. Drawing on classic arguments in the communication sciences, I argue that metaphors can hinder access to the conceptual content of one’s research and reasoning. I regard that as a potential problem, as one of the primary goals of such research is inclusion. I also contend that the use of figurative language, usually opaque and indirect, may reveal that the topic of women’s careers in academia is emotionally charged, bordering on the taboo. Finally, I problematise the assumption that underlies much of the literature: that the use of particular metaphors can influence behaviour and power relations.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes on contributor

Sofia Moratti is currently affiliated with the ‘Balanse’ program, a nationwide project on gender balance in Norwegian academia. She received her doctorate from the University of Groningen, the Netherlands (2009). She worked at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy, as a ‘Max Weber’ postdoctoral fellow and later as a senior researcher (2011–2015). She published extensively in various international journals on a variety of topics, including women’s access to birth control.

Notes

1 ‘Slaying’ here may be descriptive (a synthetic account of current historical processes) or prescriptive.

2 Oxford Dictionary.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Council of Norway under grant no. 70430400.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 712.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.