399
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Vertical Airflow Resistance of Chickpea (C. Arietinum) Cultivars as Affected by Bulk Density and Moisture Content

&
Pages 481-494 | Received 14 Mar 2004, Accepted 07 Jun 2004, Published online: 01 Aug 2008

Figures & data

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of apparatus for measuring the airflow resistance of seeds.

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of apparatus for measuring the airflow resistance of seeds.

Table 1 Physical attributes of three chickpea cultivars measured at initial moisture content

Table 2 Experimental data of airflow resistance (Pa/m) of three chickpea cultivars as affected by moisture content, bulk density and airflow rate.Footnote

Figure 2 Effect of bed depth on airflow resistance of large kabuli chickpea at moisture content of 9.32% (wet basis), bulk density of 770 kg/m3 and four airflow rates: (Δ) 0.3; (×) 0.2; (s) 0.1; and (u) 0.08 m3s−1m−2.

Figure 2 Effect of bed depth on airflow resistance of large kabuli chickpea at moisture content of 9.32% (wet basis), bulk density of 770 kg/m3 and four airflow rates: (Δ) 0.3; (×) 0.2; (s) 0.1; and (u) 0.08 m3s−1m−2.

Table 3 Estimated parameters of three airflow resistance models at different combinations of moisture content and bulk density for large kabuli chickpea

Table 4 Estimated parameters of three airflow resistance models at different combinations of moisture content and bulk density for small kabuli (chico) chickpea

Table 5 Estimated parameters of three airflow resistance models at different combinations of moisture content and bulk density for desi chickpea

Figure 3 Percentage error in the prediction of pressure drop as a function of airflow rate of large kabuli at moisture content of 9.32% wet basis, bulk density of 770 kg/m3. (Δ) Shedd model, (♦) Hukill and Ives model, and (□) Ergun model.

Figure 3 Percentage error in the prediction of pressure drop as a function of airflow rate of large kabuli at moisture content of 9.32% wet basis, bulk density of 770 kg/m3. (Δ) Shedd model, (♦) Hukill and Ives model, and (□) Ergun model.

Table 6 Estimated model coefficients and standard error obtained by stepwise regression procedure

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.