Figures & data
Figure 1 Experimental duct [a]: (1) sample, (2) electronic scale, (3) airflow homogenization grid, (4) vanes, (5) fan, (6) dumper. Test chamber [b]: (1) homogenization grid, (2) electronic scale, (3) sample, (4) insulation, (5) cylinders holding the sample, (6) anemometer.
![Figure 1 Experimental duct [a]: (1) sample, (2) electronic scale, (3) airflow homogenization grid, (4) vanes, (5) fan, (6) dumper. Test chamber [b]: (1) homogenization grid, (2) electronic scale, (3) sample, (4) insulation, (5) cylinders holding the sample, (6) anemometer.](/cms/asset/2a0195e2-b039-4261-ad91-03a56d35149e/ljfp_a_478322_o_f0001g.gif)
Table 1 Characteristics of the tested cucumber samples used in the fifteen examined experimental cases
Table 2 The values of a, b, and c of EquationEq. (2) with the related statistical parameters
Figure 3 Water vapour pressure deficit change with the surface temperature of the freezing produce (solid lines are estimated by EquationEq. 2).
![Figure 3 Water vapour pressure deficit change with the surface temperature of the freezing produce (solid lines are estimated by EquationEq. 2).](/cms/asset/ae9cbfd2-dbcc-4ccb-9373-b3ac32822976/ljfp_a_478322_o_f0003g.gif)
Figure 2 The surface temperature during the freezing process for the tested air temperatures (−10, −18, −25°C) and velocities (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 5.0 m.s−1).
![Figure 2 The surface temperature during the freezing process for the tested air temperatures (−10, −18, −25°C) and velocities (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 5.0 m.s−1).](/cms/asset/aebc8750-8f46-4c88-a284-e7f23d09c63f/ljfp_a_478322_o_f0002g.gif)
Table 3 The estimated
,
, and
values for air-freezing of unpeeled cucumber (present experiment) compared to
values from Dincer and Genceli[
16
] and Dincer[2] conducted experiments
Figure 4 Estimated values based on Hilpert correlation from the present experiment (points) compared to Dincer[2] and Dincer and Genceli[
16
] experiments for air-cooling of unpeeled cucumber.
![Figure 4 Estimated values based on Hilpert correlation from the present experiment (points) compared to Dincer[2] and Dincer and Genceli[ 16 ] experiments for air-cooling of unpeeled cucumber.](/cms/asset/3f29c95c-3251-4d57-bef1-6f893e1d2759/ljfp_a_478322_o_f0004g.gif)
Figure 5 Sherwood number variation with Re for air-freezing of unpeeled cucumber (present experiment).
![Figure 5 Sherwood number variation with Re for air-freezing of unpeeled cucumber (present experiment).](/cms/asset/a4df4356-e51d-4cd8-a1b3-c727216d642f/ljfp_a_478322_o_f0005g.gif)
Table 4 The estimated values of
, δθ ± std, δd ± std, and the experimental measured values of i
m
± std for air-freezing of unpeeled cucumber
Figure 6 The reduced mass loss (%) during the freezing process for the tested air temperatures (−10, −18, −25°C) and velocities (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 5.0 m.s−1).
![Figure 6 The reduced mass loss (%) during the freezing process for the tested air temperatures (−10, −18, −25°C) and velocities (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 5.0 m.s−1).](/cms/asset/d189f39f-cb43-4073-8fde-0f7390dd5348/ljfp_a_478322_o_f0006g.gif)