Figures & data
Figure 1. The side and rear view of the RF heating system (a) and the interior view of the RF heating system (b) showing I: reflex signal conditioner; II: temperature controller; III: data acquisition device; IV: data acquisition software; V: electrodes; VI: canola seeds; VII: fibre optic temperature sensors.[Citation20]
![Figure 1. The side and rear view of the RF heating system (a) and the interior view of the RF heating system (b) showing I: reflex signal conditioner; II: temperature controller; III: data acquisition device; IV: data acquisition software; V: electrodes; VI: canola seeds; VII: fibre optic temperature sensors.[Citation20]](/cms/asset/0d1306ae-719b-40cd-b11e-8afdcb661940/ljfp_a_1272609_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. The location of the hottest spot of the small -volume samples (a), and the large-volume samples at MCs of 5% and 7% (b), and 9% and 11% (c).[Citation20]
![Figure 2. The location of the hottest spot of the small -volume samples (a), and the large-volume samples at MCs of 5% and 7% (b), and 9% and 11% (c).[Citation20]](/cms/asset/42203d3d-58bf-471a-8ce2-62d4e35eea54/ljfp_a_1272609_f0002_b.gif)
Table 1. The regression models for the temperature of the canola seeds as a function of the RF exposure time (s) at different seed MCs and volumes during the RF heating.
Figure 3. The temperature histories of the small- (a) and large- (b) volume samples at the indicated MCs of the seeds during RF heating. (Note: The experimental data points are connected with simple straight lines for visual presentation.)
![Figure 3. The temperature histories of the small- (a) and large- (b) volume samples at the indicated MCs of the seeds during RF heating. (Note: The experimental data points are connected with simple straight lines for visual presentation.)](/cms/asset/072bc974-0d92-4850-b5c9-0275f0194227/ljfp_a_1272609_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. The survival rates (%) of the adult T. castaneum infesting (a) the small- and (b) large-volume samples at different seed MCs during the RF heating. (Note: The experimental data points are connected with simple straight lines for visual presentation.)
![Figure 4. The survival rates (%) of the adult T. castaneum infesting (a) the small- and (b) large-volume samples at different seed MCs during the RF heating. (Note: The experimental data points are connected with simple straight lines for visual presentation.)](/cms/asset/17e7cbd8-bff2-4cea-bd7b-3b5095e24f6e/ljfp_a_1272609_f0004_oc.jpg)
Table 2. The performance of the kinetic model (Eq. 5) in predicting the mortalities of the adult T. castaneum during the RF heating.
Figure 5. The survival rates (%) of the adult T. castaneum infesting the small (A) and the large (B) volume samples at 5% (a), 7% (b), 9% (c), and 11% (d) seed MCs during the RF heating.
![Figure 5. The survival rates (%) of the adult T. castaneum infesting the small (A) and the large (B) volume samples at 5% (a), 7% (b), 9% (c), and 11% (d) seed MCs during the RF heating.](/cms/asset/00495a81-adb4-426d-8c0c-42aefc7e728d/ljfp_a_1272609_f0005b_oc.jpg)
Table 3. The RF exposure times (s) to achieve 100% mortality and the LTs (s) determined from the experimental and simulated data for the adult T. castaneum at the indicated seed MCs and volumes.