2,284
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Oxidative and microbiological stability of raw ground pork during chilled storage as affected by Plant extracts

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 111-129 | Received 17 Sep 2018, Accepted 31 Jan 2019, Published online: 21 Feb 2019

Figures & data

Table 1. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compound content of ethanol in water (1/1v/v/) extracts

Table 2. Effect of various treatments on peroxide values (POVs) and conjugated dienes (CDs) in raw ground pork during refrigerated storage (4°C) for 12 days

Figure 1. Oxidation induction period (IP) of fat from raw ground pork samples treated with spice extracts determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals, and means with the same letter in superscript are not different (p > 0.05). Asterisk in superscript refers to a paired comparison (control compared with other natural additives is significant at the p < 0.05 level using Dunnett’s T-test, null hypothesis: treatment > Control)

Figure 1. Oxidation induction period (IP) of fat from raw ground pork samples treated with spice extracts determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals, and means with the same letter in superscript are not different (p > 0.05). Asterisk in superscript refers to a paired comparison (control compared with other natural additives is significant at the p < 0.05 level using Dunnett’s T-test, null hypothesis: treatment > Control)

Figure 2. Changes in TBARS of raw ground pork with different treatments during 12 days of chilled storage at 4°C. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals, and means with the same superscript within the same day are not different (p > 0.05)

Figure 2. Changes in TBARS of raw ground pork with different treatments during 12 days of chilled storage at 4°C. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals, and means with the same superscript within the same day are not different (p > 0.05)

Table 3. Effect of various treatments on hexanal content (mg/100 g meat) in raw ground pork during refrigerated storage (4°C) for 12 days

Figure 3. Changes in thiol group content of raw ground pork with different treatments during 12 days of chilled storage at 4°C. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals, and means with the same superscript within the same day are not different (p > 0.05)

Figure 3. Changes in thiol group content of raw ground pork with different treatments during 12 days of chilled storage at 4°C. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals, and means with the same superscript within the same day are not different (p > 0.05)

Table 4. Effect of various treatments on microbiological quality of raw ground pork during refrigerated storage (4°C) for 12 days

Table 5. Effect of various treatments on pH value in raw ground pork during refrigerated storage (4°C) for 12 days

Table 6. Effect of various treatments on color parameters in raw ground pork during refrigerated storage (4°C) for 12 days

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available (privately) in Mendeley dataset at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/p496hmyy44/draft?a=e6ba017a-11fc-4af6-9d40-41724b04aafa