Figures & data
Figure 1. Peracetic acid oxidation change molecular structure of natural SPI to improve surface hydrophobicity and surface activity
![Figure 1. Peracetic acid oxidation change molecular structure of natural SPI to improve surface hydrophobicity and surface activity](/cms/asset/6c1431a9-0271-4926-9c08-2cf1534b43a2/ljfp_a_1602540_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Percentage of disulfide bond cleavage of SPI. The ratios of peracetic acid to SPI are 0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, and 1.8% (v/v), respectively. Different letters on top of a symbol of the line indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among samples treated under different conditions
![Figure 2. Percentage of disulfide bond cleavage of SPI. The ratios of peracetic acid to SPI are 0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, and 1.8% (v/v), respectively. Different letters on top of a symbol of the line indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among samples treated under different conditions](/cms/asset/604bf665-6d39-4f97-a5bc-b7f3f5a21edc/ljfp_a_1602540_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Changes of the surface hydrophobicity of SPI (0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, 1.8% of peracetic acid, v/v). Different letters on top of a symbol of the line indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among samples treated under different conditions
![Figure 3. Changes of the surface hydrophobicity of SPI (0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, 1.8% of peracetic acid, v/v). Different letters on top of a symbol of the line indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among samples treated under different conditions](/cms/asset/612ed550-1170-49ea-97ab-f9a6009b9fe5/ljfp_a_1602540_f0003_b.gif)
Table 1. γCMC and CMC values for each group of samples
Figure 4. Relationships between surface tension and mass concentration of samples (0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, 1.8% of peracetic acid, v/v)
![Figure 4. Relationships between surface tension and mass concentration of samples (0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, 1.8% of peracetic acid, v/v)](/cms/asset/ffd4e1e9-3cc3-4300-99f1-26b65efb7e07/ljfp_a_1602540_f0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. Foaming capacity and stability of the SPI with different concentrations of peracetic acid (0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, 1.8%, v/v). Different letters on top of a column indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among samples treated under different conditions
![Figure 5. Foaming capacity and stability of the SPI with different concentrations of peracetic acid (0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, 1.8%, v/v). Different letters on top of a column indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among samples treated under different conditions](/cms/asset/4db4d66d-e769-44f3-8b27-ff7f2102acd0/ljfp_a_1602540_f0005_b.gif)
Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients among surface properties and the surface hydrophobicity of oxidized-SPI
Figure 6. Emulsification capacity and stability of the SPI with different concentrations of peracetic acid (0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, 1.8%, v/v). Different letters on top of a column indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among samples treated under different conditions
![Figure 6. Emulsification capacity and stability of the SPI with different concentrations of peracetic acid (0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, 1.8%, v/v). Different letters on top of a column indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among samples treated under different conditions](/cms/asset/6a0e13fb-50b0-4edb-8c29-5f53a5b99edb/ljfp_a_1602540_f0006_b.gif)
Figure 7. Fluorescence spectra of the oxidized SPI with different concentrations of peracetic acid. The ratios of peracetic acid to SPI are 0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, and 1.8% (v/v), respectively
![Figure 7. Fluorescence spectra of the oxidized SPI with different concentrations of peracetic acid. The ratios of peracetic acid to SPI are 0, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1%, 1.4%, and 1.8% (v/v), respectively](/cms/asset/4497c016-1ea2-4552-aa49-b8b053bab67b/ljfp_a_1602540_f0007_b.gif)
Table 3. The content of secondary structural conformation of modified SPI with different peracetic acid percent. The results were expressed as mean ±SD of at least three independent observations