2,389
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Structural and functional modifications of kudzu starch modified by branching enzyme

, , &
Pages 952-966 | Received 21 Jan 2019, Accepted 10 May 2019, Published online: 24 May 2019

Figures & data

Figure 2. HPAEC diagram of amylopectins from natural (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Figure 2. HPAEC diagram of amylopectins from natural (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Figure 1. The morphology of natural (a) and enzyme-treated kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Figure 1. The morphology of natural (a) and enzyme-treated kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Table 1. Molecular structure and hygroscopic characteristics of natural and enzyme-modified starches

Table 2. Gelatinization properties of natural and enzyme-modified starch granules

Figure 3. 1HNMR diagram of natural (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

The right numbers refer as α-1, 6 glycosidic linkage.
Figure 3. 1HNMR diagram of natural (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Figure 4. XRD diagram of natural (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

The right numbers represent relative crystallinity.
Figure 4. XRD diagram of natural (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Figure 5. Apparent viscosity versus shear rate of native (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Figure 5. Apparent viscosity versus shear rate of native (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Figure 6. The elastic modulus (G′) and the viscous modulus (G″) as a function of angular frequency (ω) of native (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Figure 6. The elastic modulus (G′) and the viscous modulus (G″) as a function of angular frequency (ω) of native (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Figure 7. The loss tangent (Tan δ) and complex viscosity (η*) as a function of angular frequency (ω) of native (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h

Figure 7. The loss tangent (Tan δ) and complex viscosity (η*) as a function of angular frequency (ω) of native (a) and enzyme-modified kudzu starches of (b) BE; MA→BE (different BE time): (c) 1 h; (d) 3 h; (e) 6 h; (f) 9 h; (g) 12 h