Figures & data
Figure 1. Timeline of the pot experiment. The watering system is marked with a blue X in the centre of each pot. Round seeds are lupin and long oval seeds are barley. Four pots are shown: LP, LB(1:1), LB(1:2) and LB(1:3). Day 1: Daily irrigation of all pots is initiated. Day 6: Inoculation of lupin seeds. Day 7: Sowing of 8 lupin seeds. Day 17: Reduction to 6 lupin seeds and sowing of 8, 16 and 22 barley seeds, respectively. Day 31: Reduction to 6, 12 and 18 barley seeds, respectively. Day 53: Harvest of both lupin and barley plants.
![Figure 1. Timeline of the pot experiment. The watering system is marked with a blue X in the centre of each pot. Round seeds are lupin and long oval seeds are barley. Four pots are shown: LP, LB(1:1), LB(1:2) and LB(1:3). Day 1: Daily irrigation of all pots is initiated. Day 6: Inoculation of lupin seeds. Day 7: Sowing of 8 lupin seeds. Day 17: Reduction to 6 lupin seeds and sowing of 8, 16 and 22 barley seeds, respectively. Day 31: Reduction to 6, 12 and 18 barley seeds, respectively. Day 53: Harvest of both lupin and barley plants.](/cms/asset/0beb7e25-51b6-4287-b84e-b086eaf45ec7/tjpi_a_2255039_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. PCA score plot of the features detected in lupin roots in positive (A) and negative (B) ionisation mode, respectively, in LC-QTOF MS analysis.
![Figure 2. PCA score plot of the features detected in lupin roots in positive (A) and negative (B) ionisation mode, respectively, in LC-QTOF MS analysis.](/cms/asset/31d94bf9-a35e-4ec4-9c3a-71ee282e6879/tjpi_a_2255039_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Overview of annotated metabolites in lupin roots and shoots affected by intercropping with barley (LP compared to LB(1:3)).
Figure 3. Example of the structural elucidation following MS/MS fragmentation of metabolite 1 with spectral peaks in MS1 (top) and MS2 (bottom) (A) representing the three structural fragments, (m/z 165.018, 365.102 and 347.092) and the precursor ion (m/z 421.165) (B).
![Figure 3. Example of the structural elucidation following MS/MS fragmentation of metabolite 1 with spectral peaks in MS1 (top) and MS2 (bottom) (A) representing the three structural fragments, (m/z 165.018, 365.102 and 347.092) and the precursor ion (m/z 421.165) (B).](/cms/asset/ceab108b-8677-4078-b639-d0e6df046150/tjpi_a_2255039_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Proposed chemical structure of the six metabolites altered by the presence of barley in a lupin cropping system. Metabolite 1: a branched flavonoid – here kaempferol as backbone (1), metabolite 2: a flavonoid with a hexose – here luteolin as backbone with glucoside (2), metabolite 3: a branched flavonoid – here apigenin as backbone (3), metabolite 4: tryptophan (4), metabolite 5: a branched flavonoid – here kaempferol as backbone (5) and metabolite 6: a flavonoid with two hexoses and a malonyl – here apigenin as backbone with a diglucoside, one of which with a malonic acid ester (6).
![Figure 4. Proposed chemical structure of the six metabolites altered by the presence of barley in a lupin cropping system. Metabolite 1: a branched flavonoid – here kaempferol as backbone (1), metabolite 2: a flavonoid with a hexose – here luteolin as backbone with glucoside (2), metabolite 3: a branched flavonoid – here apigenin as backbone (3), metabolite 4: tryptophan (4), metabolite 5: a branched flavonoid – here kaempferol as backbone (5) and metabolite 6: a flavonoid with two hexoses and a malonyl – here apigenin as backbone with a diglucoside, one of which with a malonic acid ester (6).](/cms/asset/05aefbbc-e6c9-465b-be71-841062cf2940/tjpi_a_2255039_f0004_ob.jpg)