735
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Scientific and Technological Aspects of Fish Product Development. Part I: Handshaking Instrumental Texture with Consumer Preference in Burgers

, , , &
Pages 449-462 | Published online: 06 Feb 2007

Figures & data

Table 1 Formulations of fish burgers standardized at hundred parts of fish fillet

Figure 1. Force-deformation data of cooked fish burger formulations indicated by the individual traces and detailed in Table . Products were compressed at ambient temperature (23°C) with a rate of 0.1 mm/s. An example of the derivation of the ratio of inflectional stress to yield stress (S i /S y ) is given by the trace of formulation B.

Figure 1. Force-deformation data of cooked fish burger formulations indicated by the individual traces and detailed in Table 1. Products were compressed at ambient temperature (23°C) with a rate of 0.1 mm/s. An example of the derivation of the ratio of inflectional stress to yield stress (S i /S y ) is given by the trace of formulation B.

Figure 2. Handshaking hardness from compression testing with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of Table (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

Figure 2. Handshaking hardness from compression testing with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of Table 1 (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

Figure 3. Handshaking firmness from compression testing with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of Table (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

Figure 3. Handshaking firmness from compression testing with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of Table 1 (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

Figure 4. Handshaking adhesiveness from compression testing with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of Table (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

Figure 4. Handshaking adhesiveness from compression testing with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of Table 1 (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

Figure 5. Handshaking the ratio of inflexion stress to maximum stress obtained from compression testing with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of Table (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

Figure 5. Handshaking the ratio of inflexion stress to maximum stress obtained from compression testing with overall sensory desirability for the burger formulations of Table 1 (error bars indicate one standard deviation).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.