314
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Inquiry-based learning in immunology: analysis of scientific argument construction by undergraduate students in biological science and health care classes

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 68-82 | Received 03 Mar 2020, Accepted 03 Dec 2020, Published online: 12 Feb 2021
 

ABSTRACT

This study is a follow-up to the analysis of an inquiry-based learning activity applied to students in a public university in Brazil. We advocate that an effective education in immunology must incorporate elements that are essential to research in the area, such as generating and analysing data. These elements would empower students to apply science reasoning to face professional challenges. Our protocol included two of these elements: experimentation and abstraction. The utmost aim was to examine the production of argument by groups engaged in three different activities: 1) performing experiments and analysing the data generated; 2) reading papers on the subject (activation of complement) prior to the activities in (1), and 3) reading papers on the subject and analysing data generated by others. Our analysis reveals that guided scientific paper presentation was more influential than performing an experiment in terms of production of complex arguments. Additionally, we found that some groups merely described the data rather than relating the obtained data to the original question that led to the experiments. The findings described herein show the importance of engaging students in procedures that actually generate knowledge and thus incorporate scientific reasoning and discourse in higher immunology education.

Acknowledgments

P.S.M. thanks the Graduate Program in Biochemistry and Immunology (ICB/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais), and all the professors who supported this research. P.S.M also acknowledges her doctoral fellowship (CAPES/PROEX), and the sandwich doctorate fellowship (CAPES/PDSE). L.Q.V. is a CNPq fellow. The authors thank Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Ensino de Biologia (GEPEB/Universidade de São Paulo), and METAH group (Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble/France).

Grants

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001, and CNPq grant number 304,588/2013-0.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. The disclosure statement has been inserted. Please correct if this is inaccurate.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [304588/2013-0]; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior [Finance Code 001].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 135.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.