Inquiry-based learning in immunology: analysis of scientific argument construction by undergraduate students in biological science and health care classes

References

• Almudi, J. M., and M. Ceberio. 2015. “Analysis of Arguments Constructed by First-Year Engineering Students Addressing Electromagnetic Induction Problems.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 (1): 215–236. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9528-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. M., W. M. Roth, and M. K. McGinn. 1999. “Interpretations of Graphs by University Biology Students and Practicing Scientists: Toward a Social Practice View of Scientific Representation Practices.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (9): 1020–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., and J. Steenhoek. 2014. “Arguing like a Scientist: Engaging Students in Core Scientific Practices.” American Biology Teacher 76 (4): 231–237. doi:10.1525/abt.2014.76.4.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicuto, C., M. Pazinato, and B. B. Torres. 2019. “Teaching Metabolism with Scientific Articles: A New Approach.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 47 (1): 85–92. doi:10.1002/bmb.21187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crujeiras-Pérez, B., and M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre. 2017. „Students’ Progression in Monitoring Anomalous Results Obtained in Inquiry-Based Laboratory Tasks„. Research in Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., S. Simon, and J. W. Osborne. 2004. “TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse.” Science Education 88 (6): 915–933. doi:10.1002/sce.20012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. 2014. “Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science: Different Goals Demand Different Learning Methods.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (15): 2534–2553. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.899722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Mortimer, E. F., Silva, A. C. T., Diaz, J. 2008. “Epistemic Practices: An Analytical Framework for Science Classrooms”. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting. New York City.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. 2012. “Determinism and Underdetermination in Genetics: Implications for Students’ Engagement in Argumentation and Epistemic Practices.” Science & Education 23 (2): 465–484. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9561-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., A. Bugallo-Rodríguez, and R. A. Duschl. 2000. ““Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: Argument in High School Genetics.” Science Education 84 (6): 757–792. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., and J. D. Bustamante. 2003. “Discurso de Aula y Argumentación en la Clase de Ciencias: Cuestiones Teóricas y Metodológicas.” Enseñanza De Las Ciencias: Revista De Investigación Y Experiencias Didácticas 21 (3): 359–370.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., S. McDonald, and P. O. Wickman. 2012. “Science Learning and Epistemology.” In Springer International Handbooks of Education, edited by B. Fraser, K. Tobin, and C. McRobbie, 281–291. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., and P. Licona. 2018. “Epistemic Practices and Science Education.” In History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Science: Philosophy, History and Education, edited by M. Matthews, 139–165. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., and A. Takao. 2002. “Epistemic Levels in Argument: An Analysis of University Oceanography Students’ Use of Evidence in Writing.” Science Education 86 (3): 314–342. doi:10.1002/sce.10024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., and R. A. Duschl. 2002. “Toward a Research Agenda for Epistemological Studies in Science Education.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1993). Subjects, power, and knowledge: Description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. Feminist Epistemologies, edited by L. Alcoff and E. Potter, 101–120. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manzoni-de-Almeida, D. 2016. “O Desenvolvimento Da Escrita Argumentativa Nas Aulas De Imunologia Do Ensino Superior Por Metodologias Ativas.” Compartilhe Docência 1 (2): 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Manzoni-de-Almeida, D., P. Marzin-Janvier, and S. L. F. Trivelato. 2016. “Analysis of Epistemic Practices in Reports of Higher Education Students Groups in Carrying Out the Inquiry-based Activity of Immunology.” Investigações Em Ensino De Ciências 21 (2): 105–120. doi:10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2016v21n2p105.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. M. “Complement and Complement Fixation.” In Experimental Immunochemistry, edited by E. A. Kabat, M. M. Mayer, and R. T. Springfield, 1967, Springfield, Ill: Experimental Immunochemistry,2nd Ed, 133–240.
   Google Scholar
• Mello, P. S. Natale, C. C., Trivelato, S. L. F. Marzin-Janvier, P., Vieira, L. Q. Manzoni-de-Almeida, D., 2019a. “Exploring the Inquiry-based Learning Structure to Promote Scientific Culture in the Classrooms of Higher Education Sciences.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 47 (6): 672–680. DOI:10.1002/bmb.21301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, P. S., Natale, C. C., Vieira, L. Q. Manzoni-de-Almeida, D. 2019b. “Elaboração De Uma Atividade Investigativa Experimental Em Imunologia Sobre O Sistema Do Complemento Para Ensino Superior: Relato Da Construção Da Sequência Didática.” Paper presented at the IV Congresso De Inovação E Metodologias Do Ensino Superior, Belo Horizonte: M.G.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, B. P. 2000. “Measurement of Complement Hemolytic Activity, Generation of Complement-Depleted Sera, and Production of Hemolytic Intermediates.” In Complement Methods and Protocols, edited by B. P. Morgan, 61–71. Totowa: Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrı́guez de Córdoba, S., Esparza-Gordillo, J., Goicoechea de Jorge, E., Lopez-Trascasa, M., Sánchez-Corral, P. 2004. “The Human Complement Factor H: Functional Roles, Genetic Variations and Disease Associations.” Molecular Immunology 41 (4): 355–367. DOI:10.1016/j.molimm.2004.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. 2013. “Undoing Decontextualization or How Scientists Come to Understand Their Own Data/graphs.” Science Education 97 (1): 80–112. doi:10.1002/sce.21044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhard, G. 1990. “Le Concept de Système Immunitaire.” Aster 2 (10): 8–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sá, L. P., A. C. Kasseboehmer, and S. L. Queiroz. 2014. “Esquema De Argumento De Toulmin Como Instrumento De Ensino: Explorando Possibilidades.” Ensaio Pesquisa Em Educação Em Ciências (Belo Horizonte) 16 (3): 147–170. doi:10.1590/1983-21172014160307.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and D. Clark. 2009. “The Impact of Collaboration on the Outcomes of Scientific Argumentation.” Science Education 93 (3): 448–484. doi:10.1002/sce.20306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siqueira-Batista, R., Gomes, A. P., Albuquerque, V. S., Madalon-FragaI, R., Aleksandrowicz, A. M. C., Geller, M., 2009. “Ensino De Imunologia Na Educação Médica: Lições De Akira Kurosawa.” Revista Brasileira De Educação Médica 33 (2): 186–190. DOI:10.1590/S0100-55022009000200004.
   Google Scholar
• Tauber, A. I. 2000. “Moving beyond the Immune Self?” Seminars in Immunology 12 (3): 241–248. doi:10.1006/smim.2000.0237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar