546
Views
50
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Is the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) a reliable screening tool in early pregnancy?

&
Pages 787-800 | Received 07 Nov 2003, Accepted 08 Jul 2004, Published online: 01 Feb 2007
 

Abstract

The factor structure and internal reliability of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was investigated to determine the suitability of the instrument for screening during early pregnancy. The study used a cross-sectional design with all observations taken at the antenatal booking clinic. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the HADS revealed that a three-factor solution offered the most parsimonious account of the data. However, the CFA further revealed that none of the factor models tested provided a consistent and good fit to the data. It was concluded that the HADS does not reliably assess distinct domains of anxiety and depression in early pregnancy. These findings suggest that the HADS is not a suitable screening tool for symptoms of anxiety and depression in this clinical group.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful for the valuable and insightful comments by two anonymous reviewers on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 458.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.