Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 26, 2019 - Issue 7
422
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Enriching our understanding of vulnerability through the experiences and perspectives of individuals living with mental illness

, &
Pages 439-459 | Published online: 18 Oct 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Vulnerability is a central concept in research ethics and typically serves to identify individuals or groups whose participation in research prompts specific concerns or warrants special consideration. While theoretical discussions on vulnerability have contributed valuable insights to discussions of mental health research and care, they have not been enriched thus far by stakeholder perspectives. This oversight has important consequences for the ways in which we frame vulnerability. It misses the far-reaching insights and experiential knowledge of mental health research participants whose experiences this ethics concept ultimately seeks to capture. In view of this gap, our study combines a pragmatist ethics framework and interpretive phenomenological analysis of qualitative interviews to explore user perspectives on the notion of vulnerability through the lived experiences of mental health research participants and patient-advocates. Importantly, these perspectives offer essential clues to address the difficulties of operationalizing concerns for vulnerability in concrete and practical ways. They help refine our understanding of this key ethics concept.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the members of the Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit for their feedback in the development of this work, as well as all of our research participants for their openness and generosity in sharing their experiences with us.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. As we mention later in the methodology section, findings directly related to this research question will be reported in a separate paper.

2. We explain our use of the first-person singular in the methods section above.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [grant number 97982], and the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQ-S) [grant number 30998].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 461.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.