556
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Testing the impact of culturally-relevant communication style on engagement with Hispanic and Latinx adults

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 355-368 | Received 07 Dec 2021, Accepted 31 Aug 2022, Published online: 26 Sep 2022
 

Abstract

Effective science communication for a multilingual population requires more than language translation, it also requires being mindful of cultural communication styles. This study tested the impact that communication style has on feelings of inclusion, learning, and engagement in the Earth sciences for Hispanic and Latinx adults. An online survey with open and closed questions was used to evaluate two science videos (in both Spanish and English) with different communication styles: 1) a traditional, interview-based style, where experts present a science concept, and 2) an informal conversational style, where a scientific message is shared through a casual conversation. Seventy-four participants self-identified as Hispanic and Latinx and were the focus of the data analysis. Both video styles were positively received, with participant feedback emphasizing feelings of inclusion in seeing Latina scientists, easy to understand science concepts, and accessible language. Hispanic and Latinx adults preferred the traditional video, but the conversational video ranked higher in other aspects, which varied based on participants’ primary spoken language at home. For example, the conversational video had a positive impact on the ability to relate information to their own life and increase awareness of Earth science careers for Spanish-language speakers. Findings suggest the use of both video styles could improve feelings of inclusion and engagement for Hispanic and Latinx adults. Additional aspects of culture and demographics may explain some of the language-based results. Future science videos are encouraged to be co-designed by, for, and with Hispanic and Latinx communities to emphasize cultural values while avoiding stereotyping and cultural appropriation.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank and acknowledge contributions from Christopher A. Davis, David Russi, and Rosimar Ríos Berríos, who helped with video and survey development and translation. Thank you to Rebecca Haacker for an internal review of this manuscript and general support for this project. Thank you to the two anonymous reviewers and editor-in-chief, Dr. Kimberly A. Hannula, for their excellent critique and suggestions.

Disclosure statement

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement 1852977. A. Morales was supported in part by the NOAA Cooperative Agreement with CIRES, NA17OAR4320101.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 102.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.