This article counters the contention that international private security companies (PSCs)1 are not subject to accountability mechanisms. It identifies four mechanisms — political, administrative, market and judicial — and instead asserts that the key issues are the effectiveness and appropriateness of these mechanisms. Using cases of US‐based PSCs operating in South America, the article reveals the attributes of PSC accountability mechanisms, but also suggests that change is needed for the sake of uniformity and proper applicability. In particular, the article focuses upon improvements in political accountability as a potential first step.
Accountable to whom? An assessment of international private security companies in South America
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.