Elementary Teachers’ Use of Graphical Representations in Science Teaching

References

• AinsworthSEThe function of multiple representationsComputers and Education1999332/313115210.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for Advancement of Science, P. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• AndersonSEGansnederBMUsing electronic mail surveys and computer-monitored data for studying computer-mediated communication systemsSocial Science Computer Review1995131334610.1177/089443939501300103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnningADrawing out ideas: Graphicacy and young childrenInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education1997721923910.1023/A:1008824921210
   Google Scholar
• BaumannJFHoffmanJVDuffy-HestorARoJMThe First R yesterday and today: U.S. elementary reading instruction practices reported by teachers and administratorsReading Research Quarterly200035333837710.1598/RRQ.35.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BestRMRoweMOzuruYMcNamaraDDeep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the textTopics in Language Disorders2005251658310.1097/00011363-200501000-00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownALCampioneJCDayJDLearning to learn: On training students to learn from textEducational Researcher19811021421
   Google Scholar
• ChapmanLHStatus of elementary art education: 1997–2004Studies in Art Education2005462118137
   Google Scholar
• CobanogluCWardeBMoreoPJA comparison of mail, fax, and web survey methodsInternational Journal of Market Research200143441552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CommeyrasMGroffLLiteracy professionals’ perspectives on professional development and pedagogy: A United states surveyReading Research Quarterly199833443447210.1598/RRQ.33.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CooneyTCumminsJFootsBFloodJGoldstonMJGholston-KeySet al.See learning in a whole new light: Volume 1 (Grade K Teacher’s Edition)2006IllinoisPearson Education
   Google Scholar
• CooneyTFootsBFloodJGoldstonMJGholston-KeySLappDet al.See learning in a whole new light: Volume 1 (Grade 3 Teacher’s Edition)2006IllinoisPearson Education
   Google Scholar
• CouperMPTraugottMWLamiasMJWeb survey design and administrationPublic Opinion Quarterly20016446449410.1086/318641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DillmanDMail and internet surveys: The tailored design method20002New YorkWiley
   Google Scholar
• DoblinJKolersPWrolstadMBoumaHA structure for nontextual communicationThe processing of visible language1980New YorkPlenum Press89111
   Google Scholar
• DukeNMaletteMLiteracy research methodologies2004New YorkGuilford Press
   Google Scholar
• FreitasCATalked images: Examining the contextualised nature of image usePedagogies20072151164
   Google Scholar
• GoodmanNThe languages of art1968IndianapolisHackett Publishing Company
   Google Scholar
• HandBPrainVMoving from border crossing to convergences of perspectives in language and science literacy research and practicesInternational Journal of Science Education2006282–310110710.1080/09500690500336528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HannusMHyonaJUtilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability childrenContemporary Educational Psychology1999249512310.1006/ceps.1998.0987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HendersonGLearning with diagramsAustralian Science Teachers’ Journal19994521725
   Google Scholar
• HubiszJLReport on a study of middle school physical science textsThe Physics Teacher20003930430910.1119/1.1375471
   Google Scholar
• HunterBCrismoreAPearsonPDWillowsDHoughtonHAVisual displays in basal readers and social science textbooksThe psychology of illustration: Vol. 2. Instructional issues1987New YorkSpringer-Verlag116135
   Google Scholar
• KesidouSRosemanJEHow well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from project 2061’s curriculum reviewJournal of Research in Science Teaching20023952254910.1002/tea.10035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KressGLeeuwenTReading images: The grammar of visual design1996LondonRoutledge
   Google Scholar
• KurkjianCLivingstonNLearning to read and reading to learn: Informational series booksReading Teacher20055859260010.1598/RT.58.6.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LemkeJTalking science: Language, learning, and values1990Norwood, NJAblex
   Google Scholar
• LeuDJOur children’s future: Changing the focus of literacy and literacy instructionThe Reading Teacher200053424430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LynchMWoolgarSRepresentation in scientific practice1990Cambridge, MAMIT Press
   Google Scholar
• MartinsIOteroJLeonJAGraesserACVisual imagery in school science textsThe psychology of science text comprehension2002Mahwah, N.J.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates7390
   Google Scholar
• McTigueEMDoes multimedia theory extend to middle school students?Contemporary Educational Psychology20093414315310.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MishraPThe role of abstraction in scientific illustrations: Implications for pedagogyJournal of Visual Literacy1999192139158
   Google Scholar
• MolineSI see what you mean1995York, MEStenhouse Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Moline, S. (2006). I see what you mean. Retrieved June 26, 2008, from http://k-8visual.info/.
   Google Scholar
• MossGTo work or play? Junior age nonfiction as objects of designReading20013510611010.1111/1467-9345.00171
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics (2001). Fast response survey system, survey of classes that serve children prior to kindergarten inPUBLIC schools: 2000–2001. U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Education Association, The (2006). National teacher day spotlights key issues facing profession: NEA addresses top five teaching trends and outlines ‘portrait of american teacher’. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www.nea.org/app/search/performSearch.do.
   Google Scholar
• National science education standards1996Washington, D.CNational Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-82007Washington, D.C.National Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• NewtonLDNewtonDPBlakeABrownKDo primary school science books for children show a concern for explanatory understanding?Research in Science and Technological Education20022022724010.1080/0263514022000030471
   Google Scholar
• PeeckJIncreasing picture effects in learning from illustrated textLearning and Instruction1993322723810.1016/0959-4752(93)90006-L
   Google Scholar
• PettersonRInformation design: An introduction2002PhiladelphiaJohn Benjamin
   Google Scholar
• Pozzer-ArdenghiLLRothW MMaking sense of photographsScience Education20058921924110.1002/sce.20045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RosemanJKesidouSSternLCaldwellAHeavy books light on learning: AAAS project 2061 evaluates middle grades science textbooksScience Books and Films199935243247
   Google Scholar
• RothW-MMcKinnMKInscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practiceReview of Educational Research1998683559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchnotzWPicardEHronAHow do successful and unsuccessful learners use text and graphics?Learning and Instruction1993318119910.1016/0959-4752(93)90003-I
   Google Scholar
• SmolkinLBDonovanCASaulEWImproving science instruction with information books: Understanding mulitmodal presentationsCrossing borders in literacy and science instruction2004Arlington, VANational Science Teachers Association190208
   Google Scholar
• SternEApreaCEbnerHGImproving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representationLearning and Instruction200313219120310.1016/S0959-4752(02)00020-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StoneTLAdamsSMoriokaNColor design workbook: A real-world guide to using color in graphic design2006Gloucester, MARockport
   Google Scholar
• StylianidouFOrmerodFOgbornJAnalysis of science textbook pictures about energy and pupils’ readings of themInternational Journal of Science Education200224325728310.1080/09500690110078905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SzechterLELibenLSParental guidance in preschoolers’ understanding of spatial-graphic representationsChild Development20047586988510.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00711.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrumboJVisual literacy and science communicationScience Communication19992040942510.1177/1075547099020004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TufteEREnvisioning information1990Cheshire, CTGraphics Press
   Google Scholar
• VekeriIWhat is the value of graphical displays?Educational Psychology200214326131210.1023/A:1016064429161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalkerRSchratzMFinding a silent voice for the researcher: Using photographs in evaluation and researchQualitative voices in educational researcher1993LondonFalmer Press
   Google Scholar
• WalpoleS.Changing texts, changing thinking: Comprehension demands of new science textbooksThe Reading Teacher199852358369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeissIRBanilowerERMcMahonKCSmithPSReport of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education2001Chapel Hill, NCHorizon Research, Inc
   Google Scholar
• WheelerAEHillDDiagram-ease. Why children misinterpret diagramsThe Science Teacher1990575863
   Google Scholar
• WinnWWillowsDMHoughtonHACharts, graphs, and diagrams in educational materialsThe psychology of illustration1987Harrisonburg, VAR. R. Donnelley & Sons152198
   Google Scholar
• WinnWSchnotzWKulhavyRWContributions of perceptual and congnitive processes to the comprehension of graphicsComprehension of graphics1994New YorkNorth-Holland127
   Google Scholar
• YehYMcTigueEThe frequency, variation, and function of graphical representations within standardized state science testsSchool Science and Mathematics200910543545010.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb18291.x
   Google Scholar
• YunGWTrumboCWComparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail and web formJournal of Computer Mediated Communication200061115
   Google Scholar