Systematic phonics instruction belongs in evidence-based reading programs: A response to Bowers

References

• Adesope, O.O. , Lavin, T. , Thompson, T. , & Ungerleider, C. (2011). Pedagogical strategies for teaching literacy to ESL immigrant students: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 629–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. , Cai, J. , English, L. , Kaiser, G. , Mesa, V. , & Van Dooren, W. (2019). Beyond small, medium, or large: Points of consideration when interpreting effect sizes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J.S. (2020). Reconsidering the evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than alternative methods of reading instruction. Educational Psychology Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09515-y
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, S. , & Bowers, P. (2008). Understanding SWI: ‘Structured word inquiry’ or ‘scientific word investigation’. http://www.wordworkskingston.com/WordWorks/Structured_Word_Inquiry.html
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J.S. , & Bowers, P.N. (2017). Beyond phonics: The case for teaching children the logic of the English spelling system. Educational Psychologist, 52, 124–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J.S. , & Bowers, A.N. (2018). Progress in reading instruction requires a better understanding of the English spelling system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418773749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, P.N. , & Kirby, J.R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 515–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, G. (2015). Dictionary of the British English Spelling System. Open Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J. (2016). Focus on phonics: Why Australia should adopt the Year 1 Phonics Screening Check [Research Report 22]. Centre for Independent Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Camilli, G. , Vargan, S. , & Yurecko, M. (2003). Teaching children to read: The fragile link between science and federal education policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11, 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Camilli, G. , Wolfe, M. , & Smith, M.L. (2006). Meta-analysis and reading policy: Perspectives on teaching children to read. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, A. , Rastle, K. , & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 5–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C.A. , & Bowey J.A. (2005). The efficacy of orthographic rime, grapheme-phoneme correspondence, and implicit phonics approaches to teaching decoding skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 327–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colenbrander, D. , Parsons, L. , Murphy, S. , Hon, Q. , Bowers, J. , & Davis, C. (2018). Morphological intervention for children with reading and spelling difficulties. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Davis204217920-20Colenbrander20SSSR202018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2011). A third of children reach expected level in pilot of the phonics check. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/a-third-of-children-reach-expected-level-in-pilot-of-phonics-check
   Google Scholar
• Devonshire, V. , & Fluck, M. (2010). Spelling development: Fine-tuning strategy use and capitalising on the connections between words. Learning and Instruction, 20, 361–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devonshire, V. , Morris, P. , & Fluck, M. (2013). Spelling and reading development: The effect of teaching children multiple levels of representation in their orthography. Learning and Instruction, 25, 85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Double, K.S. , McGrane, J.A. , Stiff, J.C. , & Hopfenbeck, T. (2019). The importance of early phonics improvements for predicting later reading comprehension. British Educational Research Journal, 45, 1220–1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning, Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L.C. , Nunes, S.R. , Stahl, S.A. , & Willows, D.M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel-s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galuschka, K. , Ise, E. , Krick, K. , & Schulte-K-rne, G. (2014). Effectiveness of treatment approaches for children and adolescents with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 9, e89900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J.G. , & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which readers and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84, 74–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P.B. , & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hammill, D.D. , & Swanson, H.L. (2006). The National Reading Panel-s meta-analysis of phonics instruction: Another point of view. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, I . (2010). Evidence-based reading instruction for English language learners in preschool through sixth grades: A meta-analysis of group design studies [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Minnesota. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/54192
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, P.J. , Hulme, C. , & Snowling, M.J. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 338–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, M. (2006). Measuring standards in primary English: Issues of validity and accountability with respect to PIRLS and National Curriculum test scores. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 817–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjetland, H.N. , Lerv-g, A ., Lyster, S.-A.H. , Hagtvet, B.E. , Hulme, C. , & Melby-Lerv-g, M . (2019). Pathways to reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from 4 to 9 years of age. Journal of Educational Psychology. 11, 751–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. , McGeown, S. , & Watson, J. (2011). Long-term effects of synthetic versus analytic phonics teaching on the reading and spelling ability of 10 year old boys and girls. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1365–1384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, B. (2019). Overcoming the odds: A study of Australia-s top performing disadvantaged schools [Research Report 39]. The Centre for Independent Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, D. , & O-Brien, S. (2019). Effective prevention and intervention for word-level reading difficulties. In D. Kilpatrick , R.M. Joshi & R.K. Wagner (Eds.), Reading development and difficulties: Bridging the gap between research and practice (pp. 179–210). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, B. , & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Beginning word recognition: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole word methods. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 359–387.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, B. , Bourassa, D. , & Horn, C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: Benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 115–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louden, B. (2015). High performing schools: What do they have in common? Western Australia Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, S. , McNally, S. , & Viarengo, M. (2018). Changing how literacy is taught: Evidence on synthetic phonics. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10, 217–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, G. , Eve, P.M. , Jones, K. , Banales, E. , Kohnen, S. , Anandakumar, T. , … Castles, A. (2012). Phonics training for English speaking poor readers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub2
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, G. , Sheehan, Y. , Badcock, N.A. , Francis, D.A. , Wang, H.C. , Kohnen, S. , … Castles, A. (2018). Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3
   Google Scholar
• McGrane, J. , Stiff, J. , Baird, J ., Lenkiet, J ., & Hopfenbeck, T. (2017). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study: National report for England. UK Department for Education. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/664562/PIRLS_2016_National_Report_for_England-_BRANDED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I.V.S. , Martin, M.O. , Goh, S. , & Prendergast, C. (Eds.). (2017). PIRLS 2016 encyclopedia: Education Policy and Curriculum in Reading. Northern Ireland. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2016/international-results/encyclopedia/countries/northern-ireland/languagereading-curriculum-in-the-fourth-grade/
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K. , & Hulme, C. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 154–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Department of Education. (2011). Count, Read, Succeed. A strategy to improve outcomes in literacy and numeracy. https://www.education-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/de/count-read-succeed-a-strategy-to-improve-outcomes-in-literacy-and-numeracy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Office for Standards in Education, Children-s Services and Skills (OFSTED). (2010). Reading by six: How the best schools do it. UK Office for Standards in Education, Children-s Services and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Rastle, K. (2019). The place of morphology in learning to read in English. Cortex, 116, 45–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. (2017). Language at the speed of sight: How we read, why so many can-t, and what can be done about it. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, K.H . (2007). A meta-analysis of interventions for phonemic awareness and phonics instruction for delayed older readers (Publication No. 3285626) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Suggate, S.P. (2010). Why what we teach depends on when: Grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1556–1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suggate, S.P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 77–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K.E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C.J. , Brooks, G. , & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling [DfES Research Report 711]. Department for Education and Skills, University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C. , Brooks, G. , Gascoine, L. , & Higgins, S. (2018). Phonics: Reading policy and the evidence of effectiveness from a systematic ‘tertiary’ review. Research Papers in Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1420816.
   Google Scholar
• Vousden, J.I. , Ellefson, M.R. , Solity, J. , & Chater, N. (2011). Simplifying reading: Applying the simplicity principle to reading. Cognitive Science, 35, 34–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M. , Sainsbury, M. , Worth, J. , Bamforth, H. , & Betts, H. (2015). Phonics screening check evaluation: Final report. National Foundation for Educational Research, UK Department for Education. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/YOPC03/YOPC03.pdf
   Google Scholar